Susan's Place Logo

News:

Based on internal web log processing I show 3,417,511 Users made 5,324,115 Visits Accounting for 199,729,420 pageviews and 8.954.49 TB of data transfer for 2017, all on a little over $2,000 per month.

Help support this website by Donating or Subscribing! (Updated)

Main Menu

Exclusive inclusiveness

Started by Shana A, January 31, 2008, 10:46:01 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Shana A

Exclusive inclusiveness

http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/natacha_kennedy/2008/01/by_natacha_kennedy_via_bw.html

Which is better: to be ignored because of inertia or deliberately excluded? This is what most transgendered people in the UK face
Natacha Kennedy

January 31, 2008 12:30 PM

Labour has a good record of passing laws supporting minority and disadvantaged groups. These include legislation prohibiting discrimination against people on the grounds of age, race and sexual orientation. So it comes as a surprise to find a Labour government deliberately intending to exclude one specific minority group from the provisions of the Single Equality Bill. That group is transgendered people who are not transsexual, ie the vast majority of transgendered people.
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken." Oscar Wilde


  •  

Lisbeth

Have they been talking to Barney Frank?
"Anyone who attempts to play the 'real transsexual' card should be summarily dismissed, as they are merely engaging in name calling rather than serious debate."
--Julia Serano

http://juliaserano.blogspot.com/2011/09/transsexual-versus-transgender.html
  •