how is wisdom the product of selective manipulation of data? Please respond to my point. You are obfuscating; you are using pretzel logic. I am being didactic here, I am trying to give you a lesson in logic. (Per our hierarchy:) you are insisting that information NOT ONLY adds up to knowledge, PER SE, it even is equal to wisdom. If you can sift it through the filter of your bias.
A wise person looks at the information*; might add some EXPERIENCE to that information, and might get to actually learn or even know something. Wisdom may or may not be right around the corner. OR: a person might simply wish to endlessly prop up her assumptions with reams of data. (Which may be corrupt. we *do *not *know.) OR: a person may be SO unwilling to examine anything outside of her assumption and have enough emotion invested in it, that all logic will be ignored. Information is not knowledge; knowledge is not wisdom. I can see that we may never get to "wisdom is not truth".
(*figures are ONE kind of information; now I have made the point that not all information is good information. That a person with a bone to pick, and there are both sides of this issue going at it (and you know what? I bet you have assumed that you KNOW which side I am on. You don't even have enough information for that: Remember that I started this thread based on a real-life situation where I may have needed more protection than I had available to protect house home and loved ones. I am not pro-gun. I am the sort of soft, mooshy person that has always eschewed violence or any atmo of it), will tend to bias the information they present in the first place. Alexandra has been able to summon a lot of information for her case. Quite a lot of it tends to obfuscate other's points when they are too distasteful to her premise, which appears to be simply "guns are too dangerous to be in the hands of the average person (outside of Authority)."
Now with that summation in mind, I THINK I may have got some information from this thread. I THINK I may understand, this is CLOSE to knowledge about, what EG Alexandra is doing. I am not necessarily, EVEN, claiming any wisdom.
Posted at: April 28, 2006, 02:05:49 AM
Ultimate trust in the Authority of the Information, IF IT CAN SUIT YOUR PURPOSE. IF not, let's look for another more suitable Authority and work from there to make our point. Ad nauseum...
is that how it works?
>No, it doesn't. A wise person looks at the figures and makes her own personal decision -- no third party interfererence.
Interference? This statement tends to show my point for me about relying on your own filter being the arbiter of your "Wisdom". if you are going to know something about a complex subject, it may be WISE to consult more than 1,2,3,4... parties. A wise person understands that figures do not necessarily allow her to know one single thing.
>Of course you're free to disagree and we can just move on.
To what? more reams of studies and information slanted towards a premise that seems more and more to have been etched in the stone of your mind? Namely that 'guns are to dangerous to be in the hands of an average person outside of Authority, period'.
Posted at: April 28, 2006, 02:00:04 AM
>There might be conditions there atypical of everywhere else. I'm not saying there is one, but I wouldn't close my mind to an explaination.
(You definitely wouldn't close your mind to an explanation that suits you, now would you?)
NOTO BENE: Washington DC, as might be appropriate to the capitol of our land, is absolutely 100% typical of life on the streets, IE: AT STREET LEVEL of every city in America. Street level; it is not the ivory tower; some of us do not get to be perched way above street level looking down at the unwashed masses (that are starting to feel like, some of us, that we may just need a gun), and saying "they need to just let us Authorities handle it".