According to Google Analytics 25,259,719 users made visits accounting for 140,758,117 Pageviews since December 2006
Started by Hazumu, April 22, 2008, 07:21:53 AM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
QuoteWe didn't make this up
QuoteSchools have the right and indeed the duty to protect students from unlawful harassment. The ACLU recognizes the unconscionable harassment suffered by many LGBT students and fights for their right to equal educational opportunity free from harassment. Indeed, we have filed an amicus brief in a case in which two high school students endured prolonged harassment and abuse and the authorities did nothing to stop it. But the schools may not prohibit the expression of an idea merely because it is offensive or repugnant to some or even many. An idea, by itself, is not harassment. Though a school may advocate its own position, it may not ban student speech merely because it disapproves of the student's viewpoint.To ban ideas from public schools simply because they are controversial strikes at the heart of the First Amendment and the spirit of open debate that a healthy democracy and public education require. ??If the reasoning of the vacated decision is fully adopted, the First Amendment would effectively cease to exist in public schools. A rule that allows school officials to ban any idea that they or others find offensive or repugnant would grant them unlimited license to ban almost any student speech on any topic of significance.