Quote from: CassandraR on April 29, 2008, 03:31:18 AM
Well I have no problem with this but I don't really think such people are suffering from the same medical condition we are. I mean people can choose to do anything they want with their body but its a more serious affliction for some people than others and they don't really have a choice.
Yeah but they called it "TRANSSEXUAL." What does TRANSSEXUAL mean?
If we get too many women* running around saying they're "transsexual" but don't want SRS, it impacts the ability of the rest of us to win the right to have it covered by insurance, everybody will say transsexuals can get by fine without it, because look at all those self-proclaimed "transsexuals" who say they don't want it.
*Making an allowance for the gents because their surgical outlook is so different from ours.
It's like when you're vegetarian, meaning you don't eat any dead animals at all, and you go somewhere and the hostess says "I cooked FISH
especially for you, because you're vegetarian!" How awkward. And they got that idea because of all the self-proclaimed "vegetarians" who say they eat fish (or even chicken). It screws up the definitions of the terms for those of us to whom the difference actually matters.