Quote from: Lisbeff's Ellie on July 28, 2008, 03:20:05 PM
Quote from: trapthavok on July 26, 2008, 08:24:45 PM
Well, I did a trial run with a couple of different socks today. I guess because it's that time..of the month...I'm going to take this trial with a grain of salt.
What ended up happening, since I don't want to put the socks on the inside of my underwear was I made two different lengths : One three and a half inches, and the other five and a half inches. Then I tied them around the outside of my underwear (only wore one at a time of course, during different times of the day) with some shoelace. I didn't really notice either of them most of the day, I got really comfortable with it.
The only thing was, I was kinda free ballin I guess and my shorts are mens small/boys 18, so whenever I sit down the packer kinda slides down one pants leg or the other. Is this how it's gonna be if I wear boxers? How do people keep these things under control?
i think both those lengths are a little large, especially if visible under the clothes.
most guys have a bit of a bulge, but unless they're getting an erection in their pants (which is a real no-no) you can't judge their length. i'm not including singers like Robert Plant or Tom Jones, who are just scary even in a relaxed state.
a little bit of bulge is most acceptable. even if the bulge is a little too large, it's extremely noticeable, and indicates an erection (which, again, is just not cool).
-Ell
I guess I saw it as big cause I'm not used to it yet. No one ever really notices, and I guess the bulge isn't HUGE enough to look like an erection. I just chose the sizes that the STP sites offer to do a trial run of which I'll be more comfortable with, so they should be fairly normal sizes.
Also when I sit down, the inseam of the shorts slides up a bit too, so that's probably why it's choosing a side.
At any rate, no one would be able to see it if you're wearing boxers and shorts, even if it chooses a side right? I'm paranoid about that, though I don't think anyone does...
