Hi Keira,
I agree there's a fair bit of variation, so I tried a little experiment.
I took images of post op surgical results off the web from Anne Lawrence, one image from this site provided by Steph, Dr. Suporn's club, and anywhere I could find them. I combined those images in no particular order on a page with a natal female and a couple shots of my results.
Picked a few of my very close guy friends that I know have seen their fair share and paid attention to the female anatomy. I asked them to rate the images from most to least realistic and tell me why. I told them the images were all post op surgical results, even the natal one, they also didn't know I was represented in that group of images, nor did they know I wasn't totally thrilled with the cosmetic appearance of my results. I've never mentioned it.
I realize that the images on the web aren't necessarily the best representation of any particular surgeons work, however I wanted to know what they thought of my results and there's no way I would get honest feedback if I just showed them and asked.
The rating on my result from each guy: not realistic to marginal (too bad for me). So in the end is the result botched? Everything works fine and sex feels great, so not totally botched. Just not as good as I hoped for. The image provided by Steph on this site is a Dr. Brassard result and I don't look like that. To future boyfriends: No peeking, just get busy!!
In all fairness to Dr. Brassard, he told me a skin graft may be needed since I didn't have much to work with. I gave him the ok to do so, he didn't use one in the end. That's good in one way, however I suspect that impacted the cosmetic appearance of my result. I should have stressed depth, functionality and appearance. I'll bet he would have told me, not going to happen!
Options on how big the clitoris is, no options were given to me. The three that went through at the same time as me didn't mention anything like that, so I don't know.
Prior to surgery, I was lucky enough to see real results (not just images) of Dr. Brassard's work and was happy with what I saw, but even that's somewhat misleading when trying to make a decision of who to pick (as I found out). I know Dr. Suporn uses a different technique which I'm well aware get's huge raves and in my case he may have been a better choice for me, but no guarantee and also not an option at all during that point in my life or foreseeable future for that matter.
If you're lucky enough to speak with and possibly see in person surgical results (I know that's a bit weird) that may help narrow the field in surgeon choice.
Surgical results vary depending on the original donor material and surgeon.
If I were to do this over again, once I've narrowed my list of surgeons down I would ask the surgeon: Based on what I have to work with, can you show me an image or give me a very clear idea of a possible outcome?
I'm sure a surgeon has a pretty good idea of what the end result will be like based on the starting material.
Overall I'm still pretty happy and of course no one wants to go for revisions, I'm not the first or last regardless of surgeon. Thankfully these revisions are strictly cosmetic, and now I have money which means options.
Michelle