Susan's Place Logo

News:

According to Google Analytics 25,259,719 users made visits accounting for 140,758,117 Pageviews since December 2006

Main Menu

Kinsey's Heterosexual-Homosexual Rating Scale

Started by tinkerbell, September 06, 2008, 05:54:10 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

 Where do you fall on the Kinsey Scale?

0 - Exclusively heterosexual with no homosexual
5 (6.3%)
1- Predominantly heterosexual, only incidentally homosexual
13 (16.3%)
2- Predominantly heterosexual, but more than incidentally homosexual
15 (18.8%)
3- Equally heterosexual and homosexual
13 (16.3%)
4- Predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally heterosexual
7 (8.8%)
5- Predominantly homosexual, only incidentally heterosexual
10 (12.5%)
6- Exclusively homosexual
12 (15%)
X- Asexual
5 (6.3%)

Total Members Voted: 36

Voting closed: September 07, 2009, 04:07:34 PM

Nero

Nero was the Forum Admin here at Susan's Place for several years up to the time of his death.
  •  

Osiris

अगणित रूप अनुप अपारा | निर्गुण सांगुन स्वरप तुम्हारा || नहिं कछु भेद वेद अस भासत | भक्तन से नहिं अन्तर रखत
  •  

iFindMeHere

Quote from: Tink on September 08, 2008, 08:26:11 PM

iFindMeHere: You are more than welcome to create a new poll for the Klein Grid if you wish since I also think that it would give us all a more thorough account of sexual orientation :)

tink :icon_chick:

Done :D

Posted on: September 08, 2008, 11:41:15 PM
Quote from: Hypatia on September 08, 2008, 09:09:45 PM
Quote from: iFindMeHere on September 08, 2008, 06:28:56 PM
Are you a librarian?
Yes. Why do you ask?

Because the way you speak makes me think of Library Science.

It's a compliment. :)

  •  

Hypatia

LOL, thanks for the compliments, guys. :) You must be sapiosexual! (that's my real orientation if there ever was one)
Here's what I find about compromise--
don't do it if it hurts inside,
'cause either way you're screwed,
eventually you'll find
you may as well feel good;
you may as well have some pride

--Indigo Girls
  •  

iFindMeHere

Quote from: Hypatia on September 10, 2008, 12:22:36 AM
LOL, thanks for the compliments, guys. :) You must be sapiosexual! (that's my real orientation if there ever was one)

Specifically a sapiosexual Geekphile, thank you. :)
  •  

Hypatia

The number I'd assign myself is about 5.5. I indicated 5 on the poll rather than 6, mainly because I'm skeptical about 100% absolute positions. My number used to be down around 4, but I've brought it up lately.
Here's what I find about compromise--
don't do it if it hurts inside,
'cause either way you're screwed,
eventually you'll find
you may as well feel good;
you may as well have some pride

--Indigo Girls
  •  

Natasha

same thing with the other crappy test.  i'm bisexual.  i'm attracted to males and females equally!
  •  

iFindMeHere

  •  

Natasha

is that "your opinion", if it is is, good for you!
  •  

iFindMeHere

Quote from: Natasha on September 13, 2008, 01:22:18 AM
is that "your opinion", if it is is, good for you!

alllllllllllllllllrrrighty then.
  •  

cindybc

I have never felt right in my own skin since I was a little kid. I just wasted to many years in relationships that ended up being detrimental to my health, and for many years I lived by myself, not really wanting anyone else for a partner until I met my mate Wing Walker 6years ago. From then on I knew that I would not be looking for anyone else. This late in my life and the relationship I have with Wing Walker was and still is the better of any other I have ever had before in my life. Should anything happen to Wing Walker I don't believe I would want to continue to live by myself.

So I guess that qualifies me as homosexual since we are both female. #6 on the list.

Cindy
  •  

iFindMeHere

Quote from: cindybc on September 13, 2008, 03:12:41 AM
I have never felt right in my own skin since I was a little kid. I just wasted to many years in relationships that ended up being detrimental to my health, and for many years I lived by myself, not really wanting anyone else for a partner until I met my mate Wing Walker 6years ago. From then on I knew that I would not be looking for anyone else. This late in my life and the relationship I have with Wing Walker was and still is the better of any other I have ever had before in my life. Should anything happen to Wing Walker I don't believe I would want to continue to live by myself.

So I guess that qualifies me as homosexual since we are both female. #6 on the list.

Cindy


AWWWW! romantical!
  •  

tinkerbell

Quote from: Natasha on September 13, 2008, 01:17:59 AM
same thing with the other crappy test.  i'm bisexual.  i'm attracted to males and females equally!

What are you calling crappy? The HBSOC Klein's scale?  ;)  People will always buy their way around it, you know? Circumvent the system?   ;) >:D

*giggles devilishly*

tink :icon_chick:


  •  

Aiden

I picked 5 though really I'm not that strongly atracted to anyone in the physical means.  Might be asexual leaning towards other guys.
Every day we pass people, do we see them or the mask they wear?
If you live under a mask long enough, does it eventually break or wear down?  Does it become part you?  Maybe alone, they are truly themselves?  Or maybe they have forgotten or buried themselves so long, they forget they are not a mask?
  •  

Lutin

5, too.

QuoteSpecifically a sapiosexual Geekphile, thank you. 
Isn't it sad, they have an official term for people who derive pleasure from urine and urination (urophilia/urophile), but not for "Geekphiles"... *Obviously* pee is more attractive than intelligence. ::)
  •  

Butterfly

Quote from: Tink on September 06, 2008, 05:54:10 PM
I am a Zero = exclusively heterosexual with no homosexual experiences whatsoever! 

tink :icon_chick:

So am I. 
  •  

iFindMeHere

Quote from: Lutin on September 14, 2008, 04:12:13 AM
5, too.

QuoteSpecifically a sapiosexual Geekphile, thank you. 
Isn't it sad, they have an official term for people who derive pleasure from urine and urination (urophilia/urophile), but not for "Geekphiles"... *Obviously* pee is more attractive than intelligence. ::)

Like the lady said, "Sapiosexual" is attracted to intelligence. Geekphile means I have a further specification - for me, a person's not gonna be attractive unless they know about some combination of


  • computers
  • comic books
  • video or other games
  • science
  • math
  • history

might be more i cant think of, it's early.
  •  

Aiden

Every day we pass people, do we see them or the mask they wear?
If you live under a mask long enough, does it eventually break or wear down?  Does it become part you?  Maybe alone, they are truly themselves?  Or maybe they have forgotten or buried themselves so long, they forget they are not a mask?
  •  

Lutin

Ah, see I looked up "sapiosexual" in my printed dictionary and it didn't have anything, and completely forgot that *the Internet* might have a definition...

i can to haz sum intelijintses plz?

:icon_chuckel:
  •  

Khukuri

Trying to determine my own hetero-homo rating is proving to be quite difficult. I'm not exclusively hetero or homo, and I've been accross the scale and back again. Even though I am female, I really dislike my attraction to males. Because I am female, I really dislike my attraction to females too. In recent years I have spent more time with men because it was far more socially accepted than being with women. Such relations have left much to be desired and feel wrong or backwards somehow. Relations with women feel more right, but lacking. Essentially I feel that a male/female relationship is what I want, but somehow I'm not happy with my own circumstances.

I hope this makes sense, because it doesn't to me.
  •