Susan's Place Logo

News:

Visit our Discord server  and Wiki

Main Menu

Sleaziest campaign abuse

Started by Natasha, September 17, 2008, 05:52:21 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Natasha

Sleaziest campaign abuse

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24361330-23375,00.html
9/18/2008

ACCUSATIONS of sexism are ricocheting round the American presidential
campaign like bullets in a bank safe.

There are so many shooters firing from so many ideological angles,
it's hard to work out who, if anyone, is landing a shot.

First, the Hillary Clinton campaign. While some claimed it was sexist
that Billary got a shot at the title in the first place (because she
was merely riding on her husband's stained, blue coat-tails yadda,
yadda, yadda), most of the complaints related to classic misogyny such
as:

* From Facebook: "Hillary can't handle one man; how can she handle 150
million of them?"

* From MSNBC host Tucker Carlson: "There's just something about her
that feels castrating."
  •  

NicholeW.

I couldn't agree more. The fact she is a woman will bring many "liberals" to their misogynistic selves very quickly, even other females.

Her degree of knowledge (lame and limited,) her political social stance (neanderthal, know-nothing,) her sense of others (non-existent, nincompoopish) and her economic savvy (moronic and mule-headed) are enough reasons to undermine her without any need to go after the "female-parts."

Whether it's from the left, right or center misogyny is just that and she and every other woman deserves much better than that crap.

Doesn't mean I'd cast a vote for any ticket she's on the ballot for, I won't; but, dammit, the fact that she's a woman doesn't make her all of the above, it simply makes her a woman. She ain't auditioning for any jerk's bedroom or svhool-boy fantasy -- she's running for the second highest executive office in the country.

Get it right, guys and girls, get it right.

Nichole


  •  

Kaitlyn

Yeah, it really pissed me off how people focused on her gender rather than her staggering ego and utter incompetence.  She's an arrogant, know-nothing carpetbagger of a senator who made good on her experience as "first lady", which is so far from being a real governmental position that it's not even funny.

And I get to be her constituent - yay.

Posted on: September 17, 2008, 10:52:05 PM
BTW, is anyone else offended by the idea of the "First Lady"?  It sounds like some sort of sick joke to me.  Not only is it inherently misogynistic and patronizing, but it feels like some kind of aristocratic pretension.
"The mind is not a vessel to be filled but a fire to be kindled."
— Plutarch
  •  

lisagurl

I find it fascinating that on transgender forums the selective use of gender. If people are to be treated equal then there is no gender difference. If there is a difference then they are not equal. You can not have it both ways. To divide people into groups then you have pros and cons of that group. Humans have said " All is fair in love and war" It is the observer that assigns value to the differences, not the words of the marketer. There is humor in everything, you have the vantage point.
  •  

tekla

Come on, watching these people defend her, and cry 'sexism' when she is questioned is pee in your pants funny.  You can't write comedy like that.

Earlier at the town hall meeting, a woman rose to speak and said was a Democrat who previously supported Hillary Clinton but now backed the Republican ticket.

"Give us some details and examples of your strategies and plan for economic empowerment for women," she said.

McCain signaled for Palin to answer the question.

"Well first let me take a shot at that, and I'll tell ya, I'm a product of Title IX in our schools, where equal education and equal opportunities in sports really helped propel me into the—I guess into the position that I'm in today where," Palin said.

McCain then interjected, "Could I mention she was a point guard on a state championship basketball team."


What?  A point guard?  You're kidding me right?  If people vote for this they are going to deserve everything that follows.
FIGHT APATHY!, or don't...
  •  

NicholeW.

O. Kat, don't you know that a "point-guard" is someone wearing a very firm, thick bra? :laugh:
  •  

tekla

Here I thought it was Oscar Robinson, or the Cooz, or Isiah Thomas - still, Magic Johnson not withstanding, basketball is all about the power forwards, not the point guards.

Do they think that we are that stupid (YES, we bought pet rocks after all) that we would elect her just because she is cute? 

And whats with THE HISTORICAL NOMINATION OF A WOMAN?  Its only historical for the 'Pubs to do it, seems to me the Dems did it long ago, like 1984?  Geraldine Ferraro anyone?

And it might be nice to reflect on what she said in accepting the nomination.

Tonight, the daughter of a woman whose highest goal was a future for her children talks to our nation's oldest party about a future for us all. Tonight, the daughter of working Americans tells all Americans that the future is within our reach, if we're willing to reach for it. Tonight, the daughter of an immigrant from Italy has been chosen to run for [Vice] President in the new land my father came to love.

Our faith that we can shape a better future is what the American dream is all about. The promise of our country is that the rules are fair. If you work hard and play by the rules, you can earn your share of America's blessings. Those are the beliefs I learned from my parents. And those are the values I taught my students as a teacher in the public schools of New York City.

At night, I went to law school. I became an assistant district attorney, and I put my share of criminals behind bars. I believe if you obey the law, you should be protected. But if you break the law, you must pay for your crime.

When I first ran for Congress, all the political experts said a Democrat could not win my home district in Queens. I put my faith in the people and the values that we shared. Together, we proved the political experts wrong. In this campaign, Fritz Mondale and I have put our faith in the people. And we are going to prove the experts wrong again. We are going to win. We are going to win because Americans across this country believe in the same basic dream.

Last week, I visited Elmore, Minnesota, the small town where Fritz Mondale was raised. And soon Fritz and Joan will visit our family in Queens. Nine hundred people live in Elmore. In Queens, there are 2,000 people on one block. You would think we'd be different, but we're not. Children walk to school in Elmore past grain elevators; in Queens, they pass by subway stops. But, no matter where they live, their future depends on education, and their parents are willing to do their part to make those schools as good as they can be. In Elmore, there are family farms; in Queens, small businesses. But the men and women who run them all take pride in supporting their families through hard work and initiative. On the 4th of July in Elmore, they hang flags out on Main Street; in Queens, they fly them over Grand Avenue. But all of us love our country, and stand ready to defend the freedom that it represents.

Americans want to live by the same set of rules. But under this administration, the rules are rigged against too many of our people. It isn't right that every year the share of taxes paid by individual citizens is going up, while the share paid by large corporations is getting smaller and smaller. The rules say: Everyone in our society should contribute their fair share. It isn't right that this year Ronald Reagan will hand the American people a bill for interest on the national debt larger than the entire cost of the federal government under John F. Kennedy. Our parents left us a growing economy. The rules say: We must not leave our kids a mountain of debt.

It isn't right that a woman should get paid 59 cents on the dollar for the same work as a man.

If you play by the rules, you deserve a fair day's pay for a fair day's work. It isn't right that, if trends continue, by the year 2000 nearly all of the poor people in America will be women and children. The rules of a decent society say: When you distribute sacrifice in times of austerity, you don't put women and children first. It isn't right that young people today fear they won't get the Social Security they paid for, and that older Americans fear that they will lose what they have already learned [earned]. Social Security is a contract between the last generation and the next, and the rules say: You don't break contracts.
. . .
It isn't right that young couples question whether to bring children into a world of 50,000 nuclear warheads. That isn't the vision for which Americans have struggled for more than two centuries. And our future doesn't have to be that way. Change is in the air, just as surely as when John Kennedy beckoned America to a new frontier; when Sally Ride rocketed into space; and when Reverend Jesse Jackson ran for the office of President of the United States.

By choosing a woman to run for our nation's second highest office, you send a powerful signal to all Americans: There are no doors we cannot unlock. We will place no limits on achievement. If we can do this, we can do anything.

Tonight, we reclaim our dream. We're going to make the rules of American life work fairly for all Americans again. To an Administration that would have us debate all over again whether the Voting Rights Act should be renewed and whether segregated schools should be tax exempt, we say, Mr. President: Those debates are over. On the issue of civil rights, voting rights, and affirmative action for minorities, we must not go backwards. We must -- and we will -- move forward to open the doors of opportunity.
FIGHT APATHY!, or don't...
  •  

NicholeW.

Well, opportunity's doors were certainly opened by John McCain and the deregulation of greediness and criminality!! And there you were, the opportunity to have your behind nailed to the wall by the biggest pozi-game going, credit/debt and payback!! Hoo-ray for opportunity.

And now Sarah is strolling through that door tossing passes like she was Diana Taurasi!!

Yep, opportunity, just what Gerri was talking about 24 years ago.

Nikki
  •  

tekla

I must object to you referring to our financial system as a Ponzi scheme.  Its much closer to 3 Card Monte.
FIGHT APATHY!, or don't...
  •  

NicholeW.

O, excuse me, good sir, the various designations for scams sometimes elude me! I don't have the intense personal interest in them that Mr. McSame and Ms. Paled-in have for them!!

Thanks for the correction, luv. This unknowledgable woman appreciates the distinction now!! :laugh:

Nikki
  •  

tekla

Well in the beginning the Ponzi deal did pay off.  Its a rather interesting story.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Ponzi

But in 3 Card Monte, its just outright theft, based on the ego of the player - or mark if you prefer.

So I think that's a lot closer.  Sara Palin isn't a scheme, its outright fraud.
FIGHT APATHY!, or don't...
  •