Susan's Place Logo

News:

Based on internal web log processing I show 3,417,511 Users made 5,324,115 Visits Accounting for 199,729,420 pageviews and 8.954.49 TB of data transfer for 2017, all on a little over $2,000 per month.

Help support this website by Donating or Subscribing! (Updated)

Main Menu

Six Short Takes on Why Obama Came out Ahead in the Debate

Started by NicholeW., September 27, 2008, 12:20:38 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

NicholeW.

Six Short Takes on Why Obama Came out Ahead in the Debate
AlterNet. Posted September 27, 2008.

AlterNet's Don Hazen and Joshua Holland weigh in, along with Taylor Marsh, Jane Hamsher, John Nichols and Sheryl Crow.

http://www.alternet.org/election08/100565/

Joshua Holland:
What followed was a microcosm of the 2008 race: Barack Obama dominated John McCain when the focus of the debate was on the domestic sphere and a fast-deteriorating financial sector, but ceded an enormous amount of political space to McCain on national security, accepting much of the Arizona senator's overarching neoconservative narrative that the United States is surrounded by mortal danger and evildoers and has a moral duty to maintain our forces in Iraq and elsewhere in order to defend the homeland.

McCain appeared twitchy and out of touch as the debate began with the banking meltdown and the Bush-Paulson plan to reverse it. He blinked rapidly and avoided eye contact with Obama, Lehrer and the audience as Obama came out swinging against McCain for enabling the "root causes" of the crisis to develop during decades in the Congress, including a long stint on the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation.

  •  

tekla

Well one is kinda old, looks like the picture on an iodine bottle and the other is vaguely exciting and almost has charisma, so that's not a good match up.
FIGHT APATHY!, or don't...
  •  

lisagurl

Quotebut ceded an enormous amount of political space to McCain on national security

Remember this was a public show to gain votes. Radical statements that the average public can not understand would only lose votes no matter how brilliant the strategy.
  •  

NicholeW.

Quote from: lisagurl on September 27, 2008, 02:33:03 PM
Quotebut ceded an enormous amount of political space to McCain on national security

Remember this was a public show to gain votes. Radical statements that the average public can not understand would only lose votes no matter how brilliant the strategy.

Shhh, Lisa, you'll ruin the pundit's fantasy!! :)

N~
  •