Susan's Place Logo

News:

Based on internal web log processing I show 3,417,511 Users made 5,324,115 Visits Accounting for 199,729,420 pageviews and 8.954.49 TB of data transfer for 2017, all on a little over $2,000 per month.

Help support this website by Donating or Subscribing! (Updated)

Main Menu

How Real Is Our Commitment to "History"?

Started by Natasha, October 02, 2008, 01:18:01 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Natasha

How Real Is Our Commitment to "History"?

http://www.bilerico.com/2008/10/how_real_is_our_commitment_to_history.php
Patricia Nell Warren
October 2, 2008 10:00 AM

For starters, the feminists got it wrong. In the word "history," "his-" does not refer to men. The American Heritage Dictionary index of root words shows us that "his-" probably comes from hyster, the Greek word for womb. Why womb? In times gone by, according to my native American aunties, women were the keepers of histories. Civilization starts with family history -- keeping track of the generations. Men often didn't know who the fathers of children were -- but the mothers were sure to know. No generation was ever skipped. Oral traditions rode on elaborate memory-aid systems that made sure no child was left out. The "no child left out" part is the problem today, for many who create what they call "LGBT history."

  •