Never using religion, nor biology, to argue against same-sex marriage

[Shana A]

Never using religion, nor biology, to argue against same-sex marriage
Filed by: Alex Blaze
October 13, 2008 2:00 PM

http://www.bilerico.com/2008/10/never_using_religion_nor_biology_to_argu.php

If there was proof that people who actually follow LGBT issues should be writing about them for even traditional media sources, this article could be it.

An article about two activists who are working against same-sex marriage in Connecticut yesterday in the New York Times says that it's here to inform us that the activists use "biology, not religion" to make their arguments.

Their super-biological argument? A man and a woman are needed to make a baby, so marriage should be limited to heterosexual couples.

[mickie88]

love the last comment

you can't have kids, time for a divorce. it's hilarious and its not. 



Warrior Princess Mickie

[tekla]

Their super-biological argument? A man and a woman are needed to make a baby, so marriage should be limited to heterosexual couples.

If that were true (and its not) would it not be important to test people wanting to get married for fertility?

[RebeccaFog]

sometimes you need a man and 3 women, or a woman and 3 men.  Biology is a curious thing.