Susan's Place Logo

News:

Based on internal web log processing I show 3,417,511 Users made 5,324,115 Visits Accounting for 199,729,420 pageviews and 8.954.49 TB of data transfer for 2017, all on a little over $2,000 per month.

Help support this website by Donating or Subscribing! (Updated)

Main Menu

archetypal ->-bleeped-<-

Started by lady amarant, November 04, 2008, 12:04:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Nicky

Quote from: CC on November 05, 2008, 12:33:44 PM
Here's a thought. What if ->-bleeped-<- is an evolutionary process for homo sapiens in the early stages? Maybe the start of a future gender neutral society?  ;D

I don't think there is any selection preasure to become gender neutral (assuming gender is biological and inheritable). You would still need some mechanism by which gender neutral people are more successful at breeding. I also think most transgendered people are not gender neutral. Even myself as an androgyne am not gender neutral.

But perhaps the environment has changed allowing a greater blurring of gendered behaviour so that more transgendered behaviour is expressed.

  •  

Fox

Hmm have never given to much thought to the spiritual nature of being transgendered in the belief setting of other cultures. Perhaps that evolved as a means that TG individuals after warring with themselves so much are very accustomed to conflict and solutions, so maybe they where often called upon in ancient times to be mediators and wise individuals, or maybe the mental warring brings about more a state of enlightenment and undertanding. As for th tarot my personal experineces lead me to believe its accuracy is very much dependant on the individual. Personally though I hold more faith with Astrology there is just to much hardline math behind it to not have some strong scientific basis plus the accuracy of reading an individuals sun and moon signs then comparing to there personality is often very high and accurate.
  •  

RebeccaFog

Quote from: Nicky on November 04, 2008, 01:18:51 PM
As an androgyne I don't attach mystical significance to being androgyne, but I do attach mystical significance to being me.

I think some people are significant, the rest are just scenery - perhaps collectively important but not particulalry so on their own.

Not particularly humble am I?  :D
Shut up! Those are my feelings.  Go get your own.

::)
  •  

Lisa Harney

Quote from: CC on November 05, 2008, 12:33:44 PM
Here's a thought. What if ->-bleeped-<- is an evolutionary process for homo sapiens in the early stages? Maybe the start of a future gender neutral society?  ;D



I think it's been with us for a long time, plus evidence exists that animals may experience it too (although who knows if they have any dysphoria).
  •