Susan's Place Logo

News:

According to Google Analytics 25,259,719 users made visits accounting for 140,758,117 Pageviews since December 2006

Main Menu

Alberta GRS Funding Cut Activism

Started by gothique11, April 09, 2009, 09:00:44 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

gothique11

For those who are interested in fighting back against the Alberta government regarding the cut to GRS/SRS funding, there's a facebook group set up where the information is being posted called Reinstate Gender Reassignment Surgery Funding in Alberta

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=85048933488&ref=share

I'll try to post some of the information as soon as I can about a few of the campains going on. I believe there's a demostration being set up in Edmonton and possibly Calgary.

There's also the 19-cents campaign going on, where TS and Allies are sending 19 pennies to MLA's and members of government. The 19-cents is to signify how much is costs per Alberta per year to cover all GRS services to those who need it.

There are also pentions going on, emails, letters, etc.

Human rights lawyers have also become involved, as well as several civil cases against the Alberta Government.


Thank you,

--natalie


News links (there's tons, but here's a few about what's going on):

http://www.edmontonjournal.com/Health/Funding+matter+life+death/1480527/story.html
http://calsun.canoe.ca/News/Columnists/Platt_Michael/2009/04/09/9063411-sun.php
http://calgary.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20090409/CGY_Surgery_TransGender_090409/20090409/?hub=CalgaryHome
http://www.edmontonsun.com/News/Edmonton/2009/04/09/9072676.html


  •  

Michelle.

Hi Natalie,

I live in the US. South Florida to be exact...its the sofl following  Michelle.

I'm sorry to hear that funding for SRS has been taken away in Alberta, hope it comes back.

I have a few questions if you dont mind/know.

Under the old system could you choose any physician...even outside Alberta? Outside Canada?

And if you were limited to an approved list, how were the quality of results compared to the most modern techniques?

A free/ tax payer assisted SRS might be great, but not sure if the technique/approach is that used say 20-30 years plus ago.

Were probably looking at going down the road of socialized Health Care here in the US.
Theres usually costs associated with benefits.

Thanks...Michelle.


  •  

gothique11

#2
Most people went to Dr. Brassard in Montreal, whom most people would agree is a good SRS surgeon. In certain medical cases, like diabetes, people were sent to Dr. Meltzer in Arizona. If you objected to seeing Dr. Brassard or Dr. Meltzer, I have heard of an option to see another doctor if you have a reason. I have heard of someone going to Dr. Bowers, but I don't have that confirmed.

In the case of Dr. B or Dr. Z, flights were covered for, as well as the stay. If you requested another doctor, along with a reason for the request, then I'm not sure if the flights and extra costs would be covered.

The only cost that wasn't covered was the dilators, in which you could get your dilators from Montreal for $200 or from another source (like an online source). So, you had a choice if you wanted the ones Dr. B provided or not. Flights, and stay, and any other extras were included.

In order to get approved for funding, however, you'd need to see the psychiatrist in Edmonton for a year doing your RLT (real life test). Even if you are full-time before seeing the doc, the requirement by Alberta Health was to see him for a year full-time. If you saw him and weren't full-time, it would be the year from when you are full time. So, say you saw him but didn't go full time until 6 months later, you'd have to wait a year to get approval still.

He then would have another doc come in and do up the second letter at the end of your 1 year real life test. Both psychiatrists, and letters, are free of charge.

Now, there is a bit of a wait list to see the psychiatrist, especially because the demand has gotten pretty high in the last couple of years. A lot more people have felt more comfortable coming out, and a lot more people have moved to the province to obtain surgery. At one time it was only a couple months wait, but last year I believe the wait time was just hitting over the year mark.

Also, there used to be two doctors designated by the province to approve the funding for SRS. There was Dr. Warneke and Dr. Brooks. Dr. Brook retired 2 years ago, so that made only one Doctor for all of Alberta who was approved by the province to approve publicly-funded SRS.

So, if the system was still in place, it could take about two years to go the free route.

It took me a little less, about 1.5 years. My referal into the psych doctor was sent in Aug 2006, and I saw the doctor in May 2007, and my surgery (with Dr. Brassard) was in June 2008. I started full-time around June 2006.

Now, I know of a couple of people who did not want to wait, and got two letters via private practice and paid to go to Thailand. There's nothing in the laws here preventing someone from paying for the surgery themselves, the funding has always been an option.

Over all, the Alberta system wasn't bad. The Psychatrist (Dr. Warneke) was very nice, and seeing him wasn't difficult. I think the only criticism was that the wait time (which isn't his fault, but the lack of doctors and the province not allowing other doctors to approve the funding, plus the amount of people wanting surgery has trippled in the last few years).

The other criticism, due to the amount of patients, was the over load. So, instead of seeing the doctor every couple of months as in the past, most people would only see him 4 times a year and then get approved. So people criticized the system for being "too easy" because technically someone could try and BS themselves into getting surgery. The system was based on a system of trust. I am unaware of anyone trying to take advantage of the system and lying about being full-time, but it could be possible.

So, as a "gatekeeper" Dr. W wasn't harsh which appeased a lot of people, except a few who believed he should have been harsher and only selected a select few to get through the gates.

Ontario, on the other hand, is criticized for being "too strict" and having a very narrow view of what a woman or man should be. BC's wait time, I hear, is much longer than Alberta.

Over all, the system was good. The psych doc is nice, and isn't narrow minded. And you get to see Dr. Brassard for surgery -- which is nice.

--natalie

Post Merge: April 10, 2009, 03:15:00 AM

I should also note that it's just not about funding in Alberta, but it's making a case that SRS should be covered by health care insurance and that it's medically necessary and not an elective surgery. That actually impacts more than just Alberta, Canada, but can impact other parts in the world to strengthen the case that being transsexual is a medical condition -- and not a cosmetic condition.

Thus, the fight is being pushed as a human rights fight (like it was in Ontario). Ontario's case will, more than likely, help the case here in Alberta. And these two cases can help in other parts of the country as well as outside of the country.

Also, I should note, that although the province used to pay for SRS, it didn't pay for FFS, breast augmentation, laser hair removal, or hormones. Hormones can be covered by health insurance plans, however.

  •  

Michelle.

Thanks for your reply.

I forgot that Brassard is in Montreal when I wrote my reply, yes from my research he is good.

I guess stuff like dilators fall under the catagory of medical supplies. Those too can be a sticky issue here in the US.

I've heard of girls in the US often being able to have their therapy sesions covered by insurance. It would be relativly easy for the doc to write up anziexty, depression, etc for claims purposes.

Between the RLT, HRT, hair removal, saving $ etc... 2 yrs is probably a good target for SRS in the US at the quickest as well, in my case at least.

I can understand insurance companies being reluctant in regards to a BA, even FFS to an extant. But your right the desire for eventual SRS is well beyond cosmetic, neccasary as far as I'm concerned.

Progress on that regards in the States is slow, but in some instances is moving forward.

I'll look more into the links you posted re: the human rights nature of our mutual cause.

Also let me be the first to wish you an early Happy B-Day/Anniverary. June is not that far away.

BTW... you look stunning in your avatar photo. Women like you give me great hope for the future.

The "wait list" and "gate-keeper" were the next two biggest concerns I had, interesting that in the end those issues dont seem to slow the process down too much. I could handle an extra 6 months or so... just not six years.

Hugs...Michelle.

  •