Susan's Place Logo

News:

Based on internal web log processing I show 3,417,511 Users made 5,324,115 Visits Accounting for 199,729,420 pageviews and 8.954.49 TB of data transfer for 2017, all on a little over $2,000 per month.

Help support this website by Donating or Subscribing! (Updated)

Main Menu

Ofcom investigates Moving Wallpaper 'transphobia' row

Started by Butterfly, April 01, 2009, 05:57:07 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Butterfly

Ofcom investigates Moving Wallpaper 'transphobia' row
Broadcast Now
Author: Robin Parker
April 1, 2009


http://www.broadcastnow.co.uk/news/terrestrial/2009/04/moving_wallpaper_in_transphobia_row.html


Ofcom is investigating more than 50 complaints alleging that ITV1 comedy Moving Wallpaper was offensive to transsexuals.
Viewers objected to the depiction of transsexual character Georgina, who was mocked by other characters in the episode that aired on 20 March.

Transsexual websites and blogs have also criticised the Kudos drama. A 424-member Facebook group has detailed 16 specific points of concern and is urging others to contact ITV and the regulator.
  •  

NicholeW.

There seem usually to be two sides to this sort of thing that seldom get thought about.

Of course transsexing individuals would like to be respected and accepted. Yet, the more often we are shown through the major medium (seemingly tv) in whatever aspect, maybe most importantly the comedic one, we become "normalized." People start to realize that people like us walk among them with lives and dreams.

It's a hard thing, I suppose, for some of us to put up with. But doncha take what's given and try to make a positive go of it?

I dunno. But one certainly doesn't want to alientate people of good will with what me termed shrewish protest if there are any depictions that strike any nerve with any of us. Just sayin'.
  •  

JENNIFER

If OFCOM are investigating this, they are guilty of sleeping on the job.  I think LITTLE BRITAIN and it's depiction of the ->-bleeped-<-s could be more damaging.  I get most of my problems from hostile natives because of that comedy programme.

Hayley Cropper ( Coronation Street ITV1/Granada TV ) also had to endure mocking by other characters within that soap opera but I cannot recall any publicity of complaints about that. 

If the media make us out for ridicule, the consumer is going to think it ok to laugh at us and find us a source of amusement and once they have it implanted in their tiny minds that we are funny, no amount of education will change their minds. 


  •  

Lokaeign

#3
I saw this episode.  It was really, really horrible from beginning to end.

For a start, this show is characterised by lumpen,  tedious scripting and wooden performances from all involved.  I would not trust the makers of the show to handle a sack of spuds, let alone sensitive issues like gender.

The trans character, Georgina, is played for laughs from the get-go, being introduced by a long, boring monologue from another character about how he needs "male energy" on his team, how he needs someone with b***s, etc, etc.  Her trans status is actually irrelevant to the storyline, it's just an afterthought bunged in by a creatively bankrupt scriptwriter who was evidently just bright enough to percive the vacuity of the storyline but not bright enough to address this by adding more depth or humour.  Instead, the response was to wheel in a member of a minority group and milk the stereotypes thereof for yucks.

The character is presented as a bad hire--she's been recruited over the heads of the other writers on the team, is getting preferential treatment including being paid 5 times as much money.  She's also portrayed as being an incompetent bully, with an overinflated sense of personal entitlement. 

The character is portrayed as being harassed by the other office workers.  She's continually referred to and addressed by the wrong name and subjected to derogatory comments about her "masculine" features.  Comments jokes about her genitalia are tossed around.  One of the other characters scribbles "vaginoplasty" on her planner.  The other characters do things like place bets on which loo she'll go in; they mangle her pronoun to the point of referring to her as "it."  Only one of the regular characters is shown being pleasant and compassionate to Georgina, and is then drawn as being rebuffed by the hostile trans character and joining in with the harassment.

Finally she is forced to leave.  We're told that her contract has been mishandled (with this being explicitly described as a result of her "masculine" features), so she can be booted out without consequence.  She's seen as completely expendable.

The important thing here is that all the indignity, humiliation and discrimination inflicted on the trans woman is presented as perfectly acceptable, as correct.  It's not as if this was a sub-plot, like the Corrie sub-plot, in which the harassment of trans people was being explored.  The message wasn't "these are the kinds of things which a transwoman might have to endure in the workplace so let's address that," it was "this is how you SHOULD treat a trans woman in the workplace, she deserves everything she gets and it's really funny."

This is a revolting, inexcusable piece of garbage.  The kinds of harassment faced by Georgina are a fact of life for many, many people, as is being unfairly dismissed or engineered out of employment.  Seeing these things played for laughs like that--I was literally almost weeping with rage by the end of the show.  I'd like to see everyone involved with putting this appalling piece of transphobia on the air dismissed from ITV with the same callous alacrity as Georgina.
  •  

tekla

For a start, this show is characterised by lumpen,  tedious scripting and wooden performances from all involved.

I smell HIT, hell, I SMELL EMMY!  I mean, ain't that most TV shows?

This is a revolting, inexcusable piece of garbage.

Oh, well, that's different then, sign me up, I love revolting garbage.  I mean, that's entertainment.  And that's all this is.  One show.  Or would you rather go back to Psycho and Dressed to Kill when we were all psychopaths.  Personally, I'd rather be funny then a psycho serial killer.  But that's just me.
FIGHT APATHY!, or don't...
  •  

Lokaeign

Quote from: tekla on April 06, 2009, 01:59:38 AMOr would you rather go back to Psycho and Dressed to Kill when we were all psychopaths.  Personally, I'd rather be funny then a psycho serial killer.

We've never left "back when we were all psychopaths."  Another UK series,  A Touch of Frost, ran a storyline as recently as last year which featured a trans woman who was murdering her partner's female lovers by walloping them on the back of the neck with a steel ball in a silk scarf.  If you imagine that the state of transsexual people's representation in the media is going to get any better unless people ask questions and complain every time somthing like this happens, you're kidding yourself.

It's nice for you that you enjoy sufficient social privilige that a character being harassed, insulted, given the wrong pronoun, and finally kicked out of her job doesn't hit any kind of a nerve.  There are plenty of people who haven't been so lucky, and who were less willing to things like this slide.

Post Merge: April 06, 2009, 05:56:42 AM

...have to say I am absolutely gobsmacked at the idea that the MW episode in question could possibly be seen as progress.  Oh well, guess not everyone could be bothered to watch it before talking about it. 
  •  

tekla

Oh well, guess not everyone could be bothered to watch it before talking about it.

Well duh.  As Nichole once said, "I have a sewer line running out of my house to take vile waste away, why would I want another one running back in."  But don't feel bad I don't know who the Friends people are either.  Hell I've never even watched more than that into to Dr. Who

And you don't have to watch the show to understand that 'comic relief' is a standard character or two in almost every show.  Was the Marx Brothers (movies however I'm kind of addicted to) constant use of Margaret Dumont (who also played that same character against W.C. Fields, and others) making fun of rich white overweight and slightly clueless women?  Sure.

    Dumont: I've sponsored your appointment because I feel you are the most able statesman in all Freedonia.
    Groucho: Well, that covers a lot of ground. Say, you cover a lot of ground yourself! You'd better beat it; I hear they're going to tear you down and put up an office building where you're standing!

In several accounts of the Marx Brothers career it was stated that in fact a lot of it wasn't even an act, she really didn't get it.  Oh, but I guess its OK to make fun of rich white women eh?  Matter of fact in most TV sitcoms everyone's the comic relief (its comedy after all) really, who on Gilligan's Island didn't deserve to be there?

And its not as much a matter of privilege as it is a sense of humor, slightly warped by overuse.  But I've been around comedy long enough to know that every joke is at someone's expense.  And, as I recall from some dim past, there are only two form of drama, Comedy and Tragedy, and I would rather be the first, and not the second.
FIGHT APATHY!, or don't...
  •  

Lokaeign

Comic relief?  Okay, so let me get this straight.  You actually think that a trans woman being called by the wrong (male) name name is funny.  You think calling a trans person "it" is a hoot.  Jokes about which bathroom a trans character will use--what a riot!  Other characters talking about how they're going to strangle a TS woman (with her Adam's apple, no less)--Nurse, the stitches, my sides are gonna split!  The whole staff going out on strike to get rid of the "->-bleeped-<-"--please, I can't take any more of this whacky fun!  Being sacked without consequence to your employers because you have "man hands"--zaaaaaaaanyyyyy! 

Just out of interest, what exactly would you have deemed offensive?  Maybe if they'd beaten the character to death with a fire extinguisher?

Of course, all of this is completely redundant because the only reason you're going to such lengths to defend a blatantly offensive show that you don't even watch is because you fancied taking a pot-shot at someone who's not a big name around here and won't get a lot of support.  Well, have fun with that.  I'm not really very interested in internet feuds myself; get enough aggro in real life...
  •