Susan's Place Logo

News:

Based on internal web log processing I show 3,417,511 Users made 5,324,115 Visits Accounting for 199,729,420 pageviews and 8.954.49 TB of data transfer for 2017, all on a little over $2,000 per month.

Help support this website by Donating or Subscribing! (Updated)

Main Menu

WHEN SHE BECOMES HE (ON WHY IT WAS GRANTED)

Started by Natasha, May 31, 2009, 12:28:07 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Natasha

WHEN SHE BECOMES HE (ON WHY IT WAS GRANTED)

http://www.theboholstandard.com/opinion.php?issue=122&s1=2049&s2=2050&s3=2055&s4=&s5=2059&s6=&s7=672&s8=673&s9=&s10=&s11=&s12=671&s13=&s14=
5/31/09

Several months ago we printed an article concerning the failed attempt of a male petitioner to change the entry of his name and sex from male to female in order to reflect the result of a sex reassignment surgery. The Supreme Court in the case Rommel Jacinto Dantes Silverio vs. Republic, G.R. No. 174689, October 22, 2007, held that there is no such special law in the Philippines governing sex reassignment and its effects. It was emphasized that under the Civil Register Law, a birth certificate is a historical record of the facts as they existed at the time of birth. Thus, the sex of a person is determined at birth, visually done by the birth attendant (the physician or midwife) by examining the genitals of the infant. Considering that there is no law legally recognizing sex reassignment, the determination of a person's sex made at the time of his or her birth, if not attended by error, is immutable.

  •