Quote from: Sandy on July 01, 2009, 02:23:01 PM
Yes, you're right! We'd be so much better off without a revolution.
Nope. I changed my mind. I discussed the matter privately with a friend. He convinced me that the American Revolution may have prevented a bloodier, more widespread revolution. The American Revolution helped drive home to the British that their power is not without limits, and it may very well have prevented them from suffering from a wholesale global political coronary heart attack
a la the Roman Empire. It reminded them that their resources were stretched far too thin, and it also reminded them that their exploitations would only be tolerated to a certain extent. He also suggested that the American Revolution may have inadvertantly served as a catalyst for the abolition of slavery; although he did not support this claim himself, I thought it through, and I decided that, if the British had maintained complete control over North America, the excesses of available land may have resulted in the abolition movement in Britain being put on hold. Wherever there is a surplus of land compared to the labor needed to claim and cultivate it, the importation of slave labor is likely to look attractive. As it was, the British ended up doing the entire world a service by
heavily promoting the abolition of slavery and the slave trade. I hardly call that a loss, even if it cannot absolutely or definitively be credited in part to the American Revolution.
Furthermore, he pointed out a multitude of similar events that history clearly tells us were very beneficial, all things considered.
Sorry, but I'm going to pull a partial 360 on this. I do not strongly advocate the American Revolution as a beneficial historical event, but I tentatively acknowledge its advantages.
QuoteOk, next.
Oh?