Susan's Place Logo

News:

Based on internal web log processing I show 3,417,511 Users made 5,324,115 Visits Accounting for 199,729,420 pageviews and 8.954.49 TB of data transfer for 2017, all on a little over $2,000 per month.

Help support this website by Donating or Subscribing! (Updated)

Main Menu

CRW: No, I Mean Yes, Unisex Bathrooms

Started by Shana A, August 17, 2009, 02:57:01 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Shana A

   
Monday, August 17, 2009
CRW: No, I Mean Yes, Unisex Bathrooms

http://www.teachthefacts.org/2009/08/crw-no-i-mean-yes-unisex-bathrooms.html

The City Paper had a little article last week that is generally forgettable but there is a twist down in the text. It's about the fact that people ignore the signs on public restrooms, and that in DC you aren't supposed to have signs anyway for single-stall restrooms. As any adult has noted, typically there is a line down the hallway for the ladies room even while the men's room is empty, and it is not unusual for a lady to use a stall in the men's room. Sometimes it's the other way, guys have a way of destroying the plumbing I guess, and you'll see the men's room out of order, so a man will use the ladies room. There is a certain traditional modesty involved in all this but it doesn't go very deep -- there are lots of places in Europe where men pee right along the sidewalk, there is actually nothing very lurid about it. We separate the sexes for eliminative functions out of modesty but if the situation is urgent most people don't get too freaked out if somebody uses the other room.
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken." Oscar Wilde


  •