QuoteSince she doesn't look stereotypically female, has short cropped hair and a deep, raspy voice, that's enough 'evidence' for the IAAF gender police to haul her in for gender testing
I wonder what criteria the author feels
would be sufficient 'evidence' to justify inquiry? Short of a genetic test, what else aside from superficial features is there? I don't disagree with the general sentiment but the meme in question doesn't normally lead to IAAF testing - it's the marked increase in her performance which probably triggered this, rather than the gossip alone (although yeah, the meme is stupid - the article could have cited Fatima Whitbread as a non-black athlete who also had the same cruel remarks...but was never tested).
Further, here's what IAAF "gender police" [sic] spokesman Nick Davies is
quoted as saying:
QuoteDavies said this was not a mandatory or compulsory test and the athlete was in no way suspected of cheating.
"This is a medical condition. It is nothing that she has done. There is a need to make sure rules are followed," Davies said, adding discretion and the protection of the athlete was paramount.
Presumably the "medical condition" relates to conditions that could explain the elevated testosterone levels (allegedly 3 times the normal female range). The comment about discretion and protection is somewhat ironic given the humiliation of having this very story so prominently in the press, etc..