Yikes.
How many things are wrong with this article?
1. The headline, which uses the word "shock" even though no one shocked is quoted or cited.
2. The headline, which indicates that Ms. McCormick is still working as a counselor, when she hasn't done so for several months.
3. Describing her as "burly", a stereotypical masculine adjective. Her photo doesn't show a burly person.
4. A gratuitous mention of an ex-wife, who doesn't provide any actual information in the story.
5. No apparent purpose for the article, other than an opportunity to ambush Ms. McCormick during her visit to Northern Ireland (where she no longer lives.)