Susan's Place Logo

News:

Based on internal web log processing I show 3,417,511 Users made 5,324,115 Visits Accounting for 199,729,420 pageviews and 8.954.49 TB of data transfer for 2017, all on a little over $2,000 per month.

Help support this website by Donating or Subscribing! (Updated)

Main Menu

What the DC Agenda Story on ENDA Really Means

Started by Shana A, January 29, 2010, 09:56:12 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Shana A

What the DC Agenda Story on ENDA Really Means
Filed by: Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
January 29, 2010 11:00 AM

http://www.bilerico.com/2010/01/what_the_dc_agenda_story_on_enda_really_means.php

The word is out on the street in DC that ENDA is dead, according to Lou Chibbaro, the famed veteran gay reporter at the DC Agenda. The story quotes four anonymous sources from "mainline" LGBT political advocacy groups who say that there are not enough votes in the Senate.

Duh. That was obvious from Day 1. You don't need anonymous sources to say something as obvious as that. We also knew that if the House let ENDA languish into 2010 that the battle was going to be more uphill.

What these sources are really saying, if you read between the lines, is that the DC powers-that-be are abandoning ENDA. Only a few more votes are needed in the Senate. The people who want to kill a bill always lay the blame on the Senate. But it is true that getting those 5 votes would require some serious work by Senator Harry Reid and, gasp, the President. I thought it telling that the President mentioned DADT but not ENDA in his State of the Union Address.
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken." Oscar Wilde


  •