Susan's Place Logo

News:

Since its founding in 1995 Susan's Place forums have blossomed into a truly global lifeline. To date we've delivered roughly 1.4 billion page views to hundreds of millions of unique visitors, guided more than 41,000 registered members through 1,985,081 posts and 188,474 topics across 193 boards, and—most importantly—helped save tens of thousands of lives by connecting people to vital information and support at their most vulnerable moments.

Main Menu

Should the U.S. Census Let Trans Americans Mark Something Besides 'Male' Or 'Fem

Started by Shana A, March 29, 2010, 10:40:52 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Shana A

Should the U.S. Census Let Trans Americans Mark Something Besides 'Male' Or 'Female'?

http://www.queerty.com/should-the-u-s-census-let-trans-americans-mark-something-besides-male-or-female-20100328/

We've already seen how the 2010 Census missed a huge opportunity to count America's gays. But what about America's transgender population?

With checkboxes only for "male" and "female on the census, respondents falling somewhere in the middle — whether biologically through their chromosomal make-up, or they know themselves to be women born into a man's body — don't have such an obvious choice.

"In 2000, the census form was finally altered to allow participants to identify with all their racial and ethnic groups rather than being forced to choose only one," writes the Progressive Media Project's Kalil Cohen. "This gave the government much more complex and accurate data regarding U.S. residents. Similarly, there needs to be a way to self identify one's sex beyond 'male' or 'female' on the census forms. Sex, like race, is a complex category. A person's sex includes hormones, chromosomes, and physical features, which may not neatly align as either male or female.
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken." Oscar Wilde


  •