Group wants Crown to disclose its definition of polyamory

[Shana A]

Group wants Crown to disclose its definition of polyamory
FREEDOMS / But BC Supreme Court reserves ruling in leadup to polygamy case in November
Jeremy Hainsworth / Vancouver / Wednesday, September 08, 2010

http://www.xtra.ca/public/Vancouver/Group_wants_Crown_to_disclose_its_definition_of_polyamory-9147.aspx

BC's Supreme Court Chief Justice has reserved his decision on a request by a Canadian polyamory group for the Crown to disclose its definition of polyamory.

The Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Association (CPAA) wants to know if the provincial and federal governments think polyamory falls under the current legal definition of polygamy.

---------

Polyamorists want court to declare group love legal

By Daphne Bramham, Vancouver Sun September 9, 2010

http://www.vancouversun.com/life/Polyamorists+want+court+declare+group+love+legal/3499029/story.html

Is polyamory the new gay? That's what John Ince and the Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Association would have us believe.

They define polyamory as a post-modern, secular, non-patriarchal, conjugal relationship that involves a panoply of sexual groupings and gender variations. Ince even suggests that it's non-sexual and is based in love (amore), not sex.