Susan's Place Logo

News:

Since its founding in 1995 Susan's Place forums have blossomed into a truly global lifeline. To date we've delivered roughly 1.4 billion page views to hundreds of millions of unique visitors, guided more than 41,000 registered members through 1,985,081 posts and 188,474 topics across 193 boards, and—most importantly—helped save tens of thousands of lives by connecting people to vital information and support at their most vulnerable moments.

Main Menu

‘Passing’ vs ‘being read’

Started by Natasha, January 01, 2011, 05:51:20 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Natasha

'Passing' vs 'being read'

http://angerisjustified.wordpress.com/2011/01/01/passing-vs-being-read/
1/1/11

'Passing'. Oh how horrible the term is. It is used to describe a binary trans person being accepted as a cis member of their true gender. For example; 'He passed in the shop; the checkout clerk called him 'sir'.'

It's a word with connotations of deception, of the person hiding themselves in order to be taken for something they're not. Which is self-evidently false, in the case of trans people; it is possible that it could be used in combination with the person's assigned gender, but it's not a word that I would ever bother with. Used in the context of the person's true gender, it's merely yet one more brick in the stereotype wall of the deceiver, the 'trap', the 'not-real' stereotype that many trans people get on the wrong side of every day. Let's be clear here; a trans woman is a woman, a trans man is a man. Non-binary people tend to be left out of the equation as far as 'passing' is concerned; since society doesn't recognise us, we can hardly 'pass' as our true genders/non-genders.
  •  

Miniar




"Everyone who has ever built anywhere a new heaven first found the power thereto in his own hell" - Nietzsche
  •