Thank you Slanan, that's precisely what I was trying to (unsuccessfully) get across earlier.
There's a difference between a Cis Activist and a Cis Ally.
I love cis allies and I'm pretty sure we can never have enough of them.
However I find people who are cis and activists for the 'trans cause' to be very problematic.
Historically, our entire condition and the psychology behind it has been defined by cis people. That needs to stop. We need control of our activism, we need control of how our condition is expressed by the medical community.
Cis activists need to back the eff off and listen to US.
In fact, cis activists for the 'trans cause' need to stop being activists and become allies.
This is why the thread title "The Protector of Everything Transgender" is rank in my nostrils - not only does it reek of an activist bent, but it implies some kind of ownership over transgender people and also implies that we NEED cis knights in shining armour because we're too useless to protect ourselves.
Collectively, were not. I'm not.
I especially dislike cis people 'championing' my condition without giving a frack about whether I want them to or not. I'm damn sure I'd contact the local Iwi and okay everything with them before I tried championing the cause of Maori Sovereignty in New Zealand.
It's a shame that so many cis people don't give us that basic respect.