To me, there needs to be a word for "both" sides. If there is only a word for the "weirdo", then that makes it into a "you're a freak, we're so normal we don't even need a word to express what we are, it's so blindingly obvious" kind of situation. Sorry if I'm explaining it oddly. That is why words like cis needs to exist, words like neurotypical. It's dangerous when there is only a word for the "weirdo". I don't think that cis or neurotypical are better than trans or autism-spectric, I just think that there needs to be a word for both sides.
A cis woman is not trans, a trans woman is not cis. By using the word cis, I make sure that the cis woman is not just woman, because if there were only trans women and women, then that would imply that trans women are a special kind of women. By using cis-, I make a cathegory for, well, cis people as well. Mostly I refer to people as men/women, only pointing out if they're trans or cis if it's relevant. It's the same with wether someone is NT or AS (autism spectric), it usually is irrevelant so I don't say it.
I'm sorry if this is incomprehensible, I'm in a pretty weird state of mind at the moment, I hope I haven't inconvenienced anyone.