Susan's Place Logo

News:

Since its founding in 1995 Susan's Place forums have blossomed into a truly global lifeline. To date we've delivered roughly 1.4 billion page views to hundreds of millions of unique visitors, guided more than 41,000 registered members through 1,985,081 posts and 188,474 topics across 193 boards, and—most importantly—helped save tens of thousands of lives by connecting people to vital information and support at their most vulnerable moments.

Main Menu

ENDA Reintroduced, 92 Fewer Co-Sponsors: Who's Missing?

Started by Shana A, April 08, 2011, 09:42:06 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

Shana A

April 08, 2011, 09:42:06 AM
ENDA Reintroduced, 92 Fewer Co-Sponsors: Who's Missing?
Filed by: Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
April 7, 2011 5:00 PM

http://www.bilerico.com/2011/04/enda_reintroduced_92_fewer_co-sponsors.php

ENDA was reintroduced in the 112th Congress today as HR 1397, with 92 fewer co-sponsors than when the 111th Congress closed, according to the Washington Blade.

Why are there 92 fewer co-sponsors, and what does this mean?

There are many factors at play here, as usual in human affairs.

According to Harry Gural, Barney Frank's spokesperson, 111 is a great result, given the Democrats' losses in the last election.
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken." Oscar Wilde
  •  
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions