Maybe I can answer your question.
I had srs back in '84 and even I can have sex and an orgasm.
Last time I had a cystoscopy due to kidneystones and the urologist said they did a pretty good job, because from the outside
A different with cis girls can't be seen.
The recovery is different from person to person depending on your own medical condition.
You can't compare because everybody is different and the healing is from your body, the surgeon is putting the tissue to eachother and put stitches in it.
The recovery and healing is your job and one heals better than another.
For example, i was working in a hospital who only had the heavy cases of myocardial infarction, when someone was in a very bad shape the ambulance brought the patient to that hospital because there were the best possibilities.
Needles to say that if such a hospital only get the worst cases the mortality range was higher compare to hospitals with smaller injuries.
Is this hospital worse than the others, no of course not, I should say better, but the statistics say there is a higher mortality range.
That's an example why there is no compare possible based on statistics.
BTW, talking about sex and orgasms is slightly different than having it.
I think the techniques used by the today's experienced surgeons are all good, especially in the western world.
If you go for the lowest price there is a possibility that the assistant will do the op, and you only will have one chance, what is cut off will never grow on again.
In the US and Europe the costs are higher but the doctors have to take care or they can be sued, so for their own benefit, they have to work from the standards of quality.
You can ask each one of us about the difference of surgeons but we only had one surgeon, so we can't compare, we can only be happy with the results or not.
For the record, I'm happy, but it takes some time to get used to the new parts and to know every corner of it, to have experience with sex.
I hope this is a answer to your question