Quote from: darklady on June 08, 2011, 08:56:37 AM
This says clearly that Virginia houses inmates by birthsex rather than the current genital anatomy. Their leader says it in the artickle.
The article makes it very clear that male genitalia are present. The suit is to try and basically force the State to do what self-mutilation has not done. The same actions in the community would generally result in no letters of approval being issued that the client was appropriate for surgery...
Further, this is NOT a case where someone committed their felony post-transition or entered a custodial status already on hormonal therapy (or even in therapy at all).
Quite frankly, when one is engaging in self-mutilation of ANY type, it calls into question mental fitness for ANY surgical process, no matter WHAT the location of someone might be. One should not be able to try and force ANY entity to perform an action under what amounts to an action of extortional duress, yet that is precisely what this particular convicted felon is seeking to do.
As a clue, if one wants to pursue a surgical track, it is wise NOT to commit felonious acts that carry with it the likelihood of incarceration for the term of 70 years such as was imposed in this case for what appears to be bank robbery...