News and Events => People news => Topic started by: Natasha on June 28, 2011, 05:05:22 PM Return to Full Version
Title: Nikki Araguz Accused of Violating Bond
Post by: Natasha on June 28, 2011, 05:05:22 PM
Post by: Natasha on June 28, 2011, 05:05:22 PM
Nikki Araguz Accused of Violating Bond
http://www.myfoxhouston.com/dpp/news/local/110628-nikki-araguz-court-appearance (http://www.myfoxhouston.com/dpp/news/local/110628-nikki-araguz-court-appearance)
6/28/11
By JOHN DONNELLY
HOUSTON - Transgender widow Nikki Araguz cannot seem to stay out of trouble. During a court appearance Tuesday morning, Araguz was spoken to sternly by the judge.
Araguz was summoned to court because of an apparent violation of the conditions of her bond.
http://www.myfoxhouston.com/dpp/news/local/110628-nikki-araguz-court-appearance (http://www.myfoxhouston.com/dpp/news/local/110628-nikki-araguz-court-appearance)
6/28/11
By JOHN DONNELLY
HOUSTON - Transgender widow Nikki Araguz cannot seem to stay out of trouble. During a court appearance Tuesday morning, Araguz was spoken to sternly by the judge.
Araguz was summoned to court because of an apparent violation of the conditions of her bond.
Title: Re: Nikki Araguz Accused of Violating Bond
Post by: Ann Onymous on June 28, 2011, 05:25:12 PM
Post by: Ann Onymous on June 28, 2011, 05:25:12 PM
Just once I wish the media could write a story and get the facts right...
The Fox article had eight paragraphs and no fewer than seven glaring errors.
Today's appearance was NOT because of claimed bond violations. It was a previously scheduled hearing that was calendared during the initial appearance on June 2nd. Today was to have been the arraignment on the still-unindicted charge...
Oh, and there was no prohibition on the consumption of alcohol until TODAY'S hearing. The original condition was not to enter establishments where the PRIMARY business was the service of alcohol. Given that I know not only WHEN but WHERE the picture Fox is using was taken, I can safely say that the original condition WAS NOT violated. Had the judge believed violations had, in fact, occurred, then an alcohol monitor known as SCRAM would have been added as a requirement.
The Fox article had eight paragraphs and no fewer than seven glaring errors.
Today's appearance was NOT because of claimed bond violations. It was a previously scheduled hearing that was calendared during the initial appearance on June 2nd. Today was to have been the arraignment on the still-unindicted charge...
Oh, and there was no prohibition on the consumption of alcohol until TODAY'S hearing. The original condition was not to enter establishments where the PRIMARY business was the service of alcohol. Given that I know not only WHEN but WHERE the picture Fox is using was taken, I can safely say that the original condition WAS NOT violated. Had the judge believed violations had, in fact, occurred, then an alcohol monitor known as SCRAM would have been added as a requirement.
Title: Re: Nikki Araguz Accused of Violating Bond
Post by: tekla on June 28, 2011, 06:41:51 PM
Post by: tekla on June 28, 2011, 06:41:51 PM
Just once I wish the media could write a story and get the facts right...
Yeah, and this is little stuff, a watch theft. Think of how far off they are on really big important things like war and the economy.
Yeah, and this is little stuff, a watch theft. Think of how far off they are on really big important things like war and the economy.
Title: Re: Nikki Araguz Accused of Violating Bond
Post by: Muffins on June 28, 2011, 11:29:15 PM
Post by: Muffins on June 28, 2011, 11:29:15 PM
it's amazing how much nikki's opposing party (terminology?) can get away with... not to mention fox news. Yet nikki doesn't even have to do anything and BOOM. what's up with that?