Susan's Place Transgender Resources

My mom is going to get me one of those Mr. Limpy packers and I want a small which is 5 inches (She says that's way too big) and she wants me to get the Extra small which is 3.5. Which one would be more realistic?

I have 2 packers of those sizes and I gotta say I think the 3.5 one makes a more realistic bulge.

I personally don't have one but I've read many reviews and it seems like a majority of guys prefer the 3.5 inch, they say it's more realistic looking as Osiris said. I've heard the 5 inch one can look like you're um, excited, all the time.

3.5 is typical for even big guys.  5 inches flaccid is HUGE.

I think a lot of people confuse packers for dildos, packers are flacid.

Extra small, in my opinion. Unless your pants are pretty baggy all the time.

I like the Good Vibes soft pack--that is, I like its color and texture--but the last time I looked, there wasn't an extra small. The combination of firmness and size made me start feeling self-conscious after a while. I mean, a larger gel packer is a lot, and a small-but-firm packer is a lot...the two together seem extra huge. So I went back to my extra small gel packer.

ETA: I don't know if my GV is the same size as what they have now--I keep thinking that it was 4.5 inches--but the latest version is four inches.

i'm about 5'10'' and i pack with the larger GV soft pack (sailor soft pack) and the bulge it creates is nowhere near huge, can't even tell in anything but skinny jeans. a five inch packer doesn't equal a 5 inch real penis! especially with the mr. limpy, the small mr. limpy has tiny flat balls, while the balls of the XS mr. limpy are almost round, which makes both packers look pretty much the same size in your pants (3.5 inches of dick resting on a decent sized sack or 5 inch dick with an half inch disk of "balls"). with the 3.5 inch one there can be erection issues, the five inch one will always lie flat because it's much limper.

But maybe you could talk your mom into getting you the goodvibes sailor soft pack instead? it's much more durable, and more realistic in color and feel. plus, it's phtalate-free.


@ Arch: there's a 4 inch and a 5 inch gv soft pack. if you don't like the silicone rod through the shaft you can remove it : http://youtu.be/N8unJSZOGgA (http://youtu.be/N8unJSZOGgA)

Quote from: emil on August 24, 2011, 11:56:04 AM
@ Arch: there's a 4 inch and a 5 inch gv soft pack. if you don't like the silicone rod through the shaft you can remove it

I think I covered this in my last post--I did say that they have a four-inch packer but that I'm not sure that's the same size they used to have. I don't know where to measure from, but I don't think it is the same size. I just measured my old GV packer at the longest point, and it's a healthy 4.5 inches. Too big, in my opinion. So maybe they finally got a clue and started making a smaller one. Anybody know if they did? Or are they just measuring differently? It's more like 3.5 at the shortest point, and I know that's not right.

Thanks for the link, but I would never take out the rod unless I wanted to convert the GV to an STP. When I said that I like the texture, I meant that I liked the GV because of the rod. It's the reason I ordered one in the first place.

Now that my pants are a little baggier on me, I might be able to start using the GV again. It looked better on me when I was around this weight.

Hope you don't mind a reply from an MTF CDer. I bought one for my wife to pack her tighty-whities or jockstrap for her FTM CD fun. I know that your's is a different situaution and reason and I'm not eqauting the two, but from my POV, I have to agree with Osiris' opinion that:

QuoteI think the 3.5 one makes a more realistic bulge.

It looks right at that size, it looks HOT at that size, it makes a nice profile, and I just go crazy seeing her with that nice looking male basket.

All I say is YUMMY!  :eusa_dance:


Toni-Lynn

Sorry Arch, i read your comment on the firmness of the gv softpack making you feel uncomfortable and was trying to help with that.
I never owned a 4 inch one but my 5 inch soft pack measures exactly five inches, so i'm guessing you're right and there used to be a 4.5 inch size that was discontinued.

Quote from: Caseyy on August 24, 2011, 03:34:52 PM
I've had two 5 inchers. I may go for the 3.5 inch in the future, I do find 5 inches to be a bit much at times. Like today it was just hanging halfway down my thigh, and that didn't feel realistic or pleasant.

wow this is interesting, mine doesn't hang down at all...maybe it depends very much on your height and whatnot? What kind of underwear do you wear? here's a picture of my bulge with the 5 inch packer (left) and a bio male friend's: http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6082/6078196310_b859baf380.jpg (http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6082/6078196310_b859baf380.jpg)

Dude I will tell you for a fact that the Mr. Limpy 3.5 inch will look like you have a constant erection. Because its small, it doesn't hang down from the weight of itself like the larger ones.  If you wear boxers, briefs, or even boxer briefs, your junk is gonna stick straight out.  Buy something bigger so it hangs flaccid in your pants. 

Quote from: chakka on August 24, 2011, 11:59:34 PM
Dude I will tell you for a fact that the Mr. Limpy 3.5 inch will look like you have a constant erection. Because its small, it doesn't hang down from the weight of itself like the larger ones.  If you wear boxers, briefs, or even boxer briefs, your junk is gonna stick straight out.  Buy something bigger so it hangs flaccid in your pants.

No disrespect, but I don't have this problem at all. I just have a nice, appropriate little bulge, just like the other men have in my group (except for a couple who have a considerably larger bulge). Maybe this size works because I wear TranZwear?

I had a five-inch gel packer once. The thing was so long that I felt like tying it in a knot! I hated the thing. I passed it along to a friend of mine who is six feet tall and bulky. But I don't know if he actually likes the way it packed.

Quote from: emil on August 24, 2011, 06:24:28 PM
Sorry Arch, i read your comment on the firmness of the gv softpack making you feel uncomfortable and was trying to help with that.

It's a good idea, actually, for anyone who wants to take a chance on a GV packer but still have an "escape clause" if the thing is too firm.

My mom said she was only going to buy me the cheapest she could find so I have to get the Mr. Limpy. I would have to make my own harness or wear briefs. I don't want to look like I have a constant erection but I don't want the bulge to be too big because I'm a little guy. So the 3.5 in one will make it look like I have an erection?

Kentrie, you might want to start a survey or something, with an explicit subject title so people know exactly what you're asking. Then you can find out how many guys use a 3.5" packer and how they feel about it.

I've never had a problem with my 3.5 gel packer looking too big. But if you're worried about that, ask around.

Okay. Thanks.

Sorry, late to the thread.  I forget to check here sometimes.

I pack with the 3.5" Mr. Limpy.  I've had two of them now and will probably buy my third if I can't afford a prosthetic.  I like it and I think the bulge is a realistic size.  For reference, I'm 5'3" (160 cm) and smaller build, slightly overweight. 

It does not appear as if I have an erection, even in boxers.  Yes, the shaft does stick straight out when you lie in flat on a table.  But any downward pressure (from underwear) causes it to go down.  It's a gel packer and doesn't have a firm inner core like the Sailor Soft (gv packer).  I use the home-made elastic harness.

QuoteSo the 3.5 in one will make it look like I have an erection?

It depends on how you pack it. If you wear it too high, it can look like that.

I have the 3.5" Mr Limpy and it doesn't make me look like I have an erection at all. I suppose it depends how you position it, though.

I don't think it's too small, either. It's actually a bit bigger than I was expecting — not the actual size, which is accurate, but it just looks bigger than I'd imagined somehow. Sometimes I do wish it made a more obvious bulge but I think I mainly have that problem when I'm wearing trousers that are a bit baggy anyway.

I have the 3.5in Mr. Limpy.  I have to pay attention to how it's positioned or it will look like I have an erection, which has caused some embarrassing situations.  As long as I remember to keep an eye on it when I'm moving around a lot, I generally don't have any problems.  I don't think I'm going to try the 5in though because the 3.5in already creates a sizable bulge, and I'm 5ft2.  Just for reference, my ex and I both wear skinny jeans, and when I'm packing my bulge is slightly bigger than his, and he's very well endowed. 

I feel it's just making sure that you don't wear it too high and it helps to hang the shaft on the left or right instead of right over the balls. But if your undies are very loose, then I can imagine it'll stand out a bit. As long as you wear normal fitting boxer briefs it'll be fine.

I'm also thinking of castrating mine (or half of the balls anyway) when it's a bit worn out (so I can buy a new one) to see what it does.


The bulge with the 3,5 or 5 might look more or less the same to some but I'd just feel awkward packing so much I suppose. What was the average flaccid size again? A bit over 3 inches?