Community Conversation => Female to male transsexual talk (FTM) => Transsexual talk => FTM Gear => Topic started by: NXTransit on November 27, 2011, 12:21:51 AM Return to Full Version
Title: StP packer
Post by: NXTransit on November 27, 2011, 12:21:51 AM
Post by: NXTransit on November 27, 2011, 12:21:51 AM
I've decided not to get the Peecock. Considering I would be using my birthday money to purchase it, and the fact I can't guarantee it will work, plus the cost of shipping, I'm finding it not to be worth it. I never thought I would say that. I have wanted this thing for so long, but I'm trying to.. not want it.
Anyway, I've decided to get a new stp packer, because mine is an old homemade one.
I know of practically every stp out there. I've narrowed it down to;
One thing I'm curious about regarding the DjKnowsDicks stp packer is that it has latex tubing, and I've also never seen the type of packer Dj uses. I think...
Any thoughts on the tubing? I've been using an stp for a while with latex tubing, and it has misshapen, discolored, looks quite gross, and is probably harvesting tons of bacteria (more than an stp should, anyway.)
That's my random questionnaire/statement.
Thanks,
Nick
Anyway, I've decided to get a new stp packer, because mine is an old homemade one.
I know of practically every stp out there. I've narrowed it down to;
- DjKnowsDicks
- Urimate (spoon)
- Any other suggestions?
One thing I'm curious about regarding the DjKnowsDicks stp packer is that it has latex tubing, and I've also never seen the type of packer Dj uses. I think...
Any thoughts on the tubing? I've been using an stp for a while with latex tubing, and it has misshapen, discolored, looks quite gross, and is probably harvesting tons of bacteria (more than an stp should, anyway.)
That's my random questionnaire/statement.
Thanks,
Nick
Title: Re: StP packer
Post by: Nathan90 on November 27, 2011, 05:02:59 AM
Post by: Nathan90 on November 27, 2011, 05:02:59 AM
I've got nothing to say on the STP's but latex tubing should be alright I guess. Lots of guys using latex tubing in their stp.
Title: Re: StP packer
Post by: chakka on November 28, 2011, 08:24:26 AM
Post by: chakka on November 28, 2011, 08:24:26 AM
Hey dude. As far latex tubing goes that is what most use. I don't like that latex tubing does seem to grow and get grossly mishapened. I know that stand to urimate does not use latex in his stp's. The one that i have is some type of non latex medical tubing. I dont think whether you get the spoon or the whiz type it matters. He doesnt use latex at all for either one.
Title: Re: StP packer
Post by: NXTransit on November 28, 2011, 04:00:16 PM
Post by: NXTransit on November 28, 2011, 04:00:16 PM
Quote from: chakka on November 28, 2011, 08:24:26 AM
Hey dude. As far latex tubing goes that is what most use. I don't like that latex tubing does seem to grow and get grossly mishapened. I know that stand to urimate does not use latex in his stp's. The one that i have is some type of non latex medical tubing. I dont think whether you get the spoon or the whiz type it matters. He doesnt use latex at all for either one.
I like that idea, but I was looking forward to using the receptacle for DjKnowsDicks, and his packer colors seem to be more accurate regarding skin tones. Maybe I should just go with that one and hope for the best.
Is the tubing in yours flexible (like latex tubing)?
Sorry I'm so curious, I just want to make sure I spend my money right. I used to spend it on Lego Hero Factory models... I'm cool.
Title: Re: StP packer
Post by: chakka on December 02, 2011, 10:21:22 AM
Post by: chakka on December 02, 2011, 10:21:22 AM
In my opinion, latex is a bit stiffer than what whizpacker.com uses. I have both types and I like the much softer non-latex tubing. It lays a bit better in your pants than latex.