News and Events => Political and Legal News => Topic started by: Tammy Hope on December 01, 2011, 01:12:53 AM Return to Full Version
Title: AFA's Fischer calls Lawrence King a "homosexual bully"
Post by: Tammy Hope on December 01, 2011, 01:12:53 AM
Post by: Tammy Hope on December 01, 2011, 01:12:53 AM
Tammy Rainey, Mississippi GLBTQ Examiner
December 2, 2011
In a blog post on Tuesday, the American Family Association's Bryan Fischer wrote that the E.O. Green Middle School in Oxnard, CA bore responsibility in the shooting death of Lawrence King, and implied that King himself was the bully in the situation. Fischer is the Director of Issue Analysis for Government and Public Policy for AFA, based in Tupelo MS, which the Southern Poverty Law Center lists as a hate group because of their anti-LGB/T rhetoric. He qualified his remarks by saying that the shooter, Brandon McInerney justly deserved his sentence which was handed down Monday, but then went on to say that the school ought to have "contained" King's displays of gender non-conformity which he suggests provoked McInerney to act.
Continue reading on Examiner.com AFA's Fischer calls Lawrence King a "homosexual bully" - Mississippi GLBTQ | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/glbtq-in-tupelo/afa-s-fischer-calls-lawrence-king-a-homosexual-bully#ixzz1fGTYuiHF (http://www.examiner.com/glbtq-in-tupelo/afa-s-fischer-calls-lawrence-king-a-homosexual-bully#ixzz1fGTYuiHF)
December 2, 2011
In a blog post on Tuesday, the American Family Association's Bryan Fischer wrote that the E.O. Green Middle School in Oxnard, CA bore responsibility in the shooting death of Lawrence King, and implied that King himself was the bully in the situation. Fischer is the Director of Issue Analysis for Government and Public Policy for AFA, based in Tupelo MS, which the Southern Poverty Law Center lists as a hate group because of their anti-LGB/T rhetoric. He qualified his remarks by saying that the shooter, Brandon McInerney justly deserved his sentence which was handed down Monday, but then went on to say that the school ought to have "contained" King's displays of gender non-conformity which he suggests provoked McInerney to act.
Continue reading on Examiner.com AFA's Fischer calls Lawrence King a "homosexual bully" - Mississippi GLBTQ | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/glbtq-in-tupelo/afa-s-fischer-calls-lawrence-king-a-homosexual-bully#ixzz1fGTYuiHF (http://www.examiner.com/glbtq-in-tupelo/afa-s-fischer-calls-lawrence-king-a-homosexual-bully#ixzz1fGTYuiHF)
Title: Re: AFA's Fischer calls Lawrence King a "homosexual bully"
Post by: Sailor_Saturn on December 01, 2011, 11:44:48 PM
Post by: Sailor_Saturn on December 01, 2011, 11:44:48 PM
Where have I seen the kind of logic that the AFA and Limbaugh are employing before? Hmmm....
"Officer, if she wasn't looking for sex she shouldn't have worn such a tight shirt and short skirt. Besides, she winked at me. That's as good as consent."
Seriously? Last I checked, schoolboys flirt with girls who don't want to be flirted with every damn day. Should little Suzy bring a Glock to school and gun one down to make sure that the next little Johnny gets the picture when she says no? And then, should the defense argue that the boy little Suzy gunned down had it coming because the school didn't stop him from flirting with her?
Why does the situation change when Suzy becomes Brandon McInerney and the person gunned down becomes Lawrence King, homosexual male/possible transgirl?
Also, did you see the part of Limbaugh's article where he stated this:
"Can you imagine if the kid were a conservative and wanted his civil right to indulge and inform himself about conservatism, whether the school would have said, "Hey, there's nothing we can do. The kid wants to learn about conservatism and there's nothing we can do to stop it." I hardly think so."
Last I checked children in America weren't being gunned down for being Republicans, ->-bleeped-<-.
"Officer, if she wasn't looking for sex she shouldn't have worn such a tight shirt and short skirt. Besides, she winked at me. That's as good as consent."
Seriously? Last I checked, schoolboys flirt with girls who don't want to be flirted with every damn day. Should little Suzy bring a Glock to school and gun one down to make sure that the next little Johnny gets the picture when she says no? And then, should the defense argue that the boy little Suzy gunned down had it coming because the school didn't stop him from flirting with her?
Why does the situation change when Suzy becomes Brandon McInerney and the person gunned down becomes Lawrence King, homosexual male/possible transgirl?
Also, did you see the part of Limbaugh's article where he stated this:
"Can you imagine if the kid were a conservative and wanted his civil right to indulge and inform himself about conservatism, whether the school would have said, "Hey, there's nothing we can do. The kid wants to learn about conservatism and there's nothing we can do to stop it." I hardly think so."
Last I checked children in America weren't being gunned down for being Republicans, ->-bleeped-<-.