Community Conversation => Transsexual talk => Topic started by: noneatall on July 28, 2012, 06:39:51 AM Return to Full Version
Title: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: noneatall on July 28, 2012, 06:39:51 AM
Post by: noneatall on July 28, 2012, 06:39:51 AM
I am pre-op/non-op FT on hormones for over 5 years. I am struggling a lot now, even wondering if I really have gender dysphoria anymore.
I transitioned after my mid 20s. I started on estrogen under medical supervision following all protocols. At first, estrogen felt no different - no better and no worse. Simultaneously, I got facial hair removed. Soon, I began to look childlike, like I used to when I was 5 or 6 years old, but more girly. That change in my appearance made me feel good. I started living FT.
That good feeling encouraged me to increase estrogen dose. I even felt the urge to get SRS and feel complete. My doctor had already said that my dose was lower than needed for the female level. My doctor agreed to up the dose. I was very excited. I was so happy!
However, my sexual function began to die. My penis lost all sexual sensitivity, inside and out. I could tell if it was touched, but nothing more. The ejaculate completely disappeared. Orgasm never happened. I sometimes got close to orgasm, but it was frustratingly absent in the end.
Over months, I did everything that's been suggested to cis and trans women to reach orgasm. I even got medical assistance. My doctor reached the conclusion that I need more testosterone in my body for my sexual function to return. Under supervision, I gradually reduced estrogen dose to almost zero. My sexual function returned.
Return of my sexual function only encouraged me to get back on higher estrogen dosages and contemplate surgery. My second therapist along with a psychologist wrote letters for my SRS. I was very excited about finally being able to live as a woman and never having to tuck. That is, until my sexual function was dead again.
I went through a few more cycles of this routine of losing sexual function on high estrogen doses and feeling the need to transition with SRS while on lower doses. Eventually, I lost trust in myself. I cannot trust myself anymore around my need for SRS.
In the meantime, I was living FT. I was well accepted and well adjusted as a woman. My dysphoria had begun to disappear, except my cyclical need to increase dose and get SRS.
Now my old doubts about whether I'm trans at all have returned due to this turmoil in decision making. Given that my inner self is fickle, how do I know if I was trans at all?
I've been contemplating experimenting living as a man again. I recognize that I will look very different as a man now. However, I fear that my old gender dysphoria may return if I do.
Has anyone else gone through anything similar?
I transitioned after my mid 20s. I started on estrogen under medical supervision following all protocols. At first, estrogen felt no different - no better and no worse. Simultaneously, I got facial hair removed. Soon, I began to look childlike, like I used to when I was 5 or 6 years old, but more girly. That change in my appearance made me feel good. I started living FT.
That good feeling encouraged me to increase estrogen dose. I even felt the urge to get SRS and feel complete. My doctor had already said that my dose was lower than needed for the female level. My doctor agreed to up the dose. I was very excited. I was so happy!
However, my sexual function began to die. My penis lost all sexual sensitivity, inside and out. I could tell if it was touched, but nothing more. The ejaculate completely disappeared. Orgasm never happened. I sometimes got close to orgasm, but it was frustratingly absent in the end.
Over months, I did everything that's been suggested to cis and trans women to reach orgasm. I even got medical assistance. My doctor reached the conclusion that I need more testosterone in my body for my sexual function to return. Under supervision, I gradually reduced estrogen dose to almost zero. My sexual function returned.
Return of my sexual function only encouraged me to get back on higher estrogen dosages and contemplate surgery. My second therapist along with a psychologist wrote letters for my SRS. I was very excited about finally being able to live as a woman and never having to tuck. That is, until my sexual function was dead again.
I went through a few more cycles of this routine of losing sexual function on high estrogen doses and feeling the need to transition with SRS while on lower doses. Eventually, I lost trust in myself. I cannot trust myself anymore around my need for SRS.
In the meantime, I was living FT. I was well accepted and well adjusted as a woman. My dysphoria had begun to disappear, except my cyclical need to increase dose and get SRS.
Now my old doubts about whether I'm trans at all have returned due to this turmoil in decision making. Given that my inner self is fickle, how do I know if I was trans at all?
I've been contemplating experimenting living as a man again. I recognize that I will look very different as a man now. However, I fear that my old gender dysphoria may return if I do.
Has anyone else gone through anything similar?
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: JoanneB on July 28, 2012, 04:24:56 PM
Post by: JoanneB on July 28, 2012, 04:24:56 PM
In my early 20's I test drove transitioning twice. Went on E and tried part time. After several months when lost sexual function the reality of it all hit me. What got to me the most was the big conflict inside of being trans vs just trying to be normal... again. Being only sexualy attracted towards women, ED certainly got in the way of normal big time.
The feeling that I am truely trans never abated. I never had the overwhelming desire for SRS. To me it is not what is in my panties that counts. Passing and being accepted generally as a woman is what does. I have been achieving that part time now. Sometimes the dysphoria does not seem all that intense as it was. WHen I examine why it often comes down to my old favorites which I call the 3Ds, Distractions, Diversions, or Denials, as to why.
The feeling that I am truely trans never abated. I never had the overwhelming desire for SRS. To me it is not what is in my panties that counts. Passing and being accepted generally as a woman is what does. I have been achieving that part time now. Sometimes the dysphoria does not seem all that intense as it was. WHen I examine why it often comes down to my old favorites which I call the 3Ds, Distractions, Diversions, or Denials, as to why.
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: DawnL on July 29, 2012, 12:21:53 AM
Post by: DawnL on July 29, 2012, 12:21:53 AM
I am reasonably certain you are trans. No one would go through all the steps you have if they weren't. It seems your dysphoria must have been quite strong. You've lived full time and followed transition protocol to the letter with a therapist and a psychologist. You shouldn't doubt that you're trans but you are also absolutely right to question the extent or course that your transition should follow. Your sexual function seems very important to you and that is a reasonable concern. We are sexual beings and it sounds like you are still quite young. Sexual function does exist on the other side of transition (for most of us) but it will be quite different from what you know now.
If you are questioning the need for SRS or fearful of the consequences, you should postpone any decision until you are more certain of what you want. While the experiences of others may be helpful, they shouldn't have too much influence on your decision. This is a highly personal, IRREVERSIBLE procedure. If you are uncertain, doing nothing might be the most prudent course for now.
If you are questioning the need for SRS or fearful of the consequences, you should postpone any decision until you are more certain of what you want. While the experiences of others may be helpful, they shouldn't have too much influence on your decision. This is a highly personal, IRREVERSIBLE procedure. If you are uncertain, doing nothing might be the most prudent course for now.
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: justmeinoz on July 29, 2012, 06:50:28 AM
Post by: justmeinoz on July 29, 2012, 06:50:28 AM
It sounds like the non-op route might be worth a try for a while at least. I have spent quite a while debating whether to have SRS or possibly just an Orchi.
Karen.
Karen.
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: Ms. OBrien CVT on July 29, 2012, 07:17:58 AM
Post by: Ms. OBrien CVT on July 29, 2012, 07:17:58 AM
I battled for years, off and on. I never really had an interest in sex. So that was no big deal. But I was sucidial when I tried to be a male. I just never was. But now 4 years HRT, orchidectomy, and livinf full time for most 4 years, I am happy. Except I am still trying to get SRS. I don't wish to live with tucking.
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: noneatall on July 30, 2012, 04:35:43 AM
Post by: noneatall on July 30, 2012, 04:35:43 AM
Thank you all for your responses!
> I never had the overwhelming desire for SRS. To me it is not what is in my panties that counts. Passing and being accepted generally as a woman is what does.
This is very useful!
I guess I was stuck up on the label woman. For perhaps thousands of reasons, I was unwilling to see myself as a woman as long as I still have a penis. It was my mental block. However, recognizing that all tissue which forms female organs are bio-identical to the tissue that forms the male ones, I see that it was merely hormones in the womb that resulted in one set of organs or the other. It's a bit comforting to think about it this way.
In addition, I cannot appear more feminine, which I want to, without increasing my estrogen dose. Specifically I'm talking about hair growing on my head. Whenever I've been on the doses of estrogen that brought my blood estrogen to female ovulation levels, I had luscious hair. However, those levels depress my sexuality. I could not see myself as a woman without being as feminine as I biologically can with higher estrogen levels.
And finally, I was previously unwilling to accept that my gender identity was predominantly a social matter with a social root cause. If passing and being accepted as a woman were sufficient for me, I felt that I would be denying my biological need to be female. This has been very difficult for me to admit that I was wrong. However, I am coming to the realization that I may not be trans in the biological sense, in terms of needing my entire body to be female. I only need others to believe I'm female and treat me accordingly and allow me to exercise all my rights as female. This is still hard to accept for me, but I'm getting better to being more open to it.
I'm probably not trans at all. I don't know. However, I'm worrying less about which label applies to me.
Meeting a new therapist who has no experience with gender for a lot of sessions in the last few days has really helped! His fresh perspective and logical reasoning has been fantastic! I guess I'm also more open to the idea that I may not be trans in the traditional sense, which helped too.
> Your sexual function seems very important to you and that is a reasonable concern.
Yes, this has been the stumbling block for me. I was caught between my sexuality and my need to be feminine. To your point, I probably cannot give up on either and I will need to balance out the two to feel right.
This has been a very valuable exploration for me. I don't entirely know where I go from here. I already live as a woman and I pass well too. I'm very happy with the social aspect of my life, except with dating but that's another issue. I will continue where I'm at staying steady with the estrogen dose which maintains my balance, until I feel I need to make any huge changes. And I'll ignore the feeling which estrogen gives me to up my dose and get SRS because I know that's a dead end for my sexuality as I know it.
> I never had the overwhelming desire for SRS. To me it is not what is in my panties that counts. Passing and being accepted generally as a woman is what does.
This is very useful!
I guess I was stuck up on the label woman. For perhaps thousands of reasons, I was unwilling to see myself as a woman as long as I still have a penis. It was my mental block. However, recognizing that all tissue which forms female organs are bio-identical to the tissue that forms the male ones, I see that it was merely hormones in the womb that resulted in one set of organs or the other. It's a bit comforting to think about it this way.
In addition, I cannot appear more feminine, which I want to, without increasing my estrogen dose. Specifically I'm talking about hair growing on my head. Whenever I've been on the doses of estrogen that brought my blood estrogen to female ovulation levels, I had luscious hair. However, those levels depress my sexuality. I could not see myself as a woman without being as feminine as I biologically can with higher estrogen levels.
And finally, I was previously unwilling to accept that my gender identity was predominantly a social matter with a social root cause. If passing and being accepted as a woman were sufficient for me, I felt that I would be denying my biological need to be female. This has been very difficult for me to admit that I was wrong. However, I am coming to the realization that I may not be trans in the biological sense, in terms of needing my entire body to be female. I only need others to believe I'm female and treat me accordingly and allow me to exercise all my rights as female. This is still hard to accept for me, but I'm getting better to being more open to it.
I'm probably not trans at all. I don't know. However, I'm worrying less about which label applies to me.
Meeting a new therapist who has no experience with gender for a lot of sessions in the last few days has really helped! His fresh perspective and logical reasoning has been fantastic! I guess I'm also more open to the idea that I may not be trans in the traditional sense, which helped too.
> Your sexual function seems very important to you and that is a reasonable concern.
Yes, this has been the stumbling block for me. I was caught between my sexuality and my need to be feminine. To your point, I probably cannot give up on either and I will need to balance out the two to feel right.
This has been a very valuable exploration for me. I don't entirely know where I go from here. I already live as a woman and I pass well too. I'm very happy with the social aspect of my life, except with dating but that's another issue. I will continue where I'm at staying steady with the estrogen dose which maintains my balance, until I feel I need to make any huge changes. And I'll ignore the feeling which estrogen gives me to up my dose and get SRS because I know that's a dead end for my sexuality as I know it.
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: Randi on July 30, 2012, 04:13:59 PM
Post by: Randi on July 30, 2012, 04:13:59 PM
Psychologist Anne Vitale has written of this cycling phenomenon.
When you have high testosterone your dysphoria increases. As testosterone decreases and estrogen increases, the dysphoria goes away. You reverse course and as testosterone increases dysphoria comes back.
I've observed this myself for several cycles. When I have high estrogen/low testosterone I wonder what all the fuss was about, my head is clear and I don't see what the problem was with being male. If I ramp up the testosterone and cut back on the estrogen the dysphoria returns.
Randi
http://www.avitale.com/TNote15Testosterone.htm (http://www.avitale.com/TNote15Testosterone.htm)
"It is also known that the administration of cross sex hormones MUST be maintained to sustain the anxiolytic effect. It is not unusual for some patients, feeling better after starting hormones, to believe they are cured and no longer need to continue the medication. Unfortunately what they experience is a quick return of their gender dysphoria. If there is any physical test to determine who should seriously consider partial or full transition, taking cross sex hormones is it."
When you have high testosterone your dysphoria increases. As testosterone decreases and estrogen increases, the dysphoria goes away. You reverse course and as testosterone increases dysphoria comes back.
I've observed this myself for several cycles. When I have high estrogen/low testosterone I wonder what all the fuss was about, my head is clear and I don't see what the problem was with being male. If I ramp up the testosterone and cut back on the estrogen the dysphoria returns.
Randi
http://www.avitale.com/TNote15Testosterone.htm (http://www.avitale.com/TNote15Testosterone.htm)
"It is also known that the administration of cross sex hormones MUST be maintained to sustain the anxiolytic effect. It is not unusual for some patients, feeling better after starting hormones, to believe they are cured and no longer need to continue the medication. Unfortunately what they experience is a quick return of their gender dysphoria. If there is any physical test to determine who should seriously consider partial or full transition, taking cross sex hormones is it."
Quote from: noneatall on July 28, 2012, 06:39:51 AM
Return of my sexual function only encouraged me to get back on higher estrogen dosages and contemplate surgery. My second therapist along with a psychologist wrote letters for my SRS. I was very excited about finally being able to live as a woman and never having to tuck. That is, until my sexual function was dead again.
I went through a few more cycles of this routine of losing sexual function on high estrogen doses and feeling the need to transition with SRS while on lower doses. Eventually, I lost trust in myself. I cannot trust myself anymore around my need for SRS.
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: noneatall on July 31, 2012, 03:40:43 AM
Post by: noneatall on July 31, 2012, 03:40:43 AM
Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!
This is the first time I've read any literature from a researcher describing my situation. Anne Vitale's conclusion is definitely plausible and it actually matches a previous hypothesis I had about data correlating with my own dysphoria.
My testosterone level pre-transition was close to the upper end of the male normal range and my estrogen level was also close to the upper end of the male normal range. That was my base reading. That alone should highlight some significant conversion of testosterone to estrogen via aromatase.
About 6 months before I eventually decided to transition, I began to take a DHT blocker, finasteride, which pushed my testosterone level up further. This is normal. The testosterone that did not get converted to DHT remains as testosterone, thereby increasing the total testosterone in the body. I felt more dysphoria. So, I had my doctor prescribe a stronger DHT blocker, dutasteride, which made my tesosterone level about 1/5th higher than the base level. My dysphoria got much worse.
This was the reason I started on HRT. I stopped the androgen blocker within 3 months because I had very bad health reactions to it. Estrogen alone has been sufficient since then to temper down my dysphoria. On small doses, I feel the need to increase doses and get SRS, but on higher doses I feel sexually suffocated and need to go down on the doses. This cycle is a trap.
It's good to hear that there are others who feel the same way.
Thank you again!
This is the first time I've read any literature from a researcher describing my situation. Anne Vitale's conclusion is definitely plausible and it actually matches a previous hypothesis I had about data correlating with my own dysphoria.
My testosterone level pre-transition was close to the upper end of the male normal range and my estrogen level was also close to the upper end of the male normal range. That was my base reading. That alone should highlight some significant conversion of testosterone to estrogen via aromatase.
About 6 months before I eventually decided to transition, I began to take a DHT blocker, finasteride, which pushed my testosterone level up further. This is normal. The testosterone that did not get converted to DHT remains as testosterone, thereby increasing the total testosterone in the body. I felt more dysphoria. So, I had my doctor prescribe a stronger DHT blocker, dutasteride, which made my tesosterone level about 1/5th higher than the base level. My dysphoria got much worse.
This was the reason I started on HRT. I stopped the androgen blocker within 3 months because I had very bad health reactions to it. Estrogen alone has been sufficient since then to temper down my dysphoria. On small doses, I feel the need to increase doses and get SRS, but on higher doses I feel sexually suffocated and need to go down on the doses. This cycle is a trap.
It's good to hear that there are others who feel the same way.
Thank you again!
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: Vanora on July 31, 2012, 01:19:12 PM
Post by: Vanora on July 31, 2012, 01:19:12 PM
Vitale has an interesting theory. I think her theory is on the right track but slightly incorrect for many people. I don't believe that the dysphoria is caused by high estrogen caused by high testosterone. I believe it is the testosterone itself that causes the problem. There is no way she could know precisely which hormone is causing the problem without doing significant research along with blood tests.
Her theory is correct in that testosterone via aromatase is converted to estradiol. That is a medical fact.
The way to test it would be to take some gender dysphoric people and keep their testosterone high while giving them an aromatase inhibitor and see who has a greater reduction in gender dysphoria.
Her theory is correct in that testosterone via aromatase is converted to estradiol. That is a medical fact.
The way to test it would be to take some gender dysphoric people and keep their testosterone high while giving them an aromatase inhibitor and see who has a greater reduction in gender dysphoria.
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: noneatall on July 31, 2012, 08:26:53 PM
Post by: noneatall on July 31, 2012, 08:26:53 PM
I don't believe there is a single root cause of everybody's gender dysphoria. I believe there are many reasons and trans individuals we meet come likely from several different root causes and in some cases they come from a combination of root causes. It is the search for the grand unifying theory of gender dysphoria's root cause that prevents us from figuring them out.
So Vitale's theory is unlikely to apply to the majority. Also, neither high aromatase of testosterone into estrogen nor high testosterone will be sufficient conditions for gender dysphoria. These two conditions are likely to require other conditions to also be true in order for them to cause gender dysphoria. However, both are likely causes in some individuals and I believe Vitale seems to qualify this nuance in her statements.
That said, I agree that the best way to test the aromatase theory is to use aromatase inhibitors. I'll evaluate this option with my doctors and see where it goes. And I doubt high testosterone alone would be sufficient as little kids with low testosterone also get gender dysphoria and some adults with gender dysphoria never had high testosterone levels, which is the reason I favored the idea that something in addition to the high testosterone must be true, for which high aromatase seems like a candidate.
So Vitale's theory is unlikely to apply to the majority. Also, neither high aromatase of testosterone into estrogen nor high testosterone will be sufficient conditions for gender dysphoria. These two conditions are likely to require other conditions to also be true in order for them to cause gender dysphoria. However, both are likely causes in some individuals and I believe Vitale seems to qualify this nuance in her statements.
That said, I agree that the best way to test the aromatase theory is to use aromatase inhibitors. I'll evaluate this option with my doctors and see where it goes. And I doubt high testosterone alone would be sufficient as little kids with low testosterone also get gender dysphoria and some adults with gender dysphoria never had high testosterone levels, which is the reason I favored the idea that something in addition to the high testosterone must be true, for which high aromatase seems like a candidate.
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: Vanora on August 01, 2012, 12:48:49 PM
Post by: Vanora on August 01, 2012, 12:48:49 PM
Quote from: Vanora on July 31, 2012, 01:19:12 PM
Vitale has an interesting theory. I think her theory is on the right track but slightly incorrect for many people. I don't believe that the dysphoria is caused by high estrogen caused by high testosterone. I believe it is the testosterone itself that causes the problem. There is no way she could know precisely which hormone is causing the problem without doing significant research along with blood tests.
Her theory is correct in that testosterone via aromatase is converted to estradiol. That is a medical fact.
The way to test it would be to take some gender dysphoric people and keep their testosterone high while giving them an aromatase inhibitor and see who has a greater reduction in gender dysphoria.
Agreed.
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: Tristan on August 05, 2012, 01:19:07 PM
Post by: Tristan on August 05, 2012, 01:19:07 PM
Do t feel bad. I did the same thing sort of. Let friends talk me into. It in my teens. And then transition after 18. I only fallowed through because its like a habit and I hate to not finish something. But it all works out in the end hun. If your not trans and can stop then I say do it. You will save your sugar mamma a lot of money
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: noneatall on August 21, 2012, 10:24:49 AM
Post by: noneatall on August 21, 2012, 10:24:49 AM
Thanks Tristan!
I find myself trapped though as a woman now. Making that switch back does not feel easy.
For one, I really don't care personally anymore about the labels "man" and "woman". Those feel irrelevant to me. They are molds into which I had been trying to fit in. I just don't fit in.
I look closer to a man, but I can also look closer to a woman, that is per social stereotypical definitions. However, this book has nothing to do with its cover! These labels do not define who I am.
My personality consists of a whole lot more than man/woman and even more than a combination of man and woman. I am male biologically and I understand the immutability of that biology, but I can't relate to just man or just woman as my identity.
However, to live in this society, I feel pressured to adopt one of the two genders. In that sense, I feel transgender.
Because I have been known as a woman for the last few years, most of my friends known me as a woman. I never had friends as a man, well, I did, but I did not feel like I could ever open up to them. It's hard to give up on the life you've created.
Even more of a trap is my occupation. It's hard to switch genders, especially back and forth, when you work with people who just can't get it.
I was never self-confident in my occupation although I was extremely successful until before my transition. After transition, I struggled to find and keep jobs, which also coincides with the recession and I cannot blame myself.
I find myself trapped though as a woman now. Making that switch back does not feel easy.
For one, I really don't care personally anymore about the labels "man" and "woman". Those feel irrelevant to me. They are molds into which I had been trying to fit in. I just don't fit in.
I look closer to a man, but I can also look closer to a woman, that is per social stereotypical definitions. However, this book has nothing to do with its cover! These labels do not define who I am.
My personality consists of a whole lot more than man/woman and even more than a combination of man and woman. I am male biologically and I understand the immutability of that biology, but I can't relate to just man or just woman as my identity.
However, to live in this society, I feel pressured to adopt one of the two genders. In that sense, I feel transgender.
Because I have been known as a woman for the last few years, most of my friends known me as a woman. I never had friends as a man, well, I did, but I did not feel like I could ever open up to them. It's hard to give up on the life you've created.
Even more of a trap is my occupation. It's hard to switch genders, especially back and forth, when you work with people who just can't get it.
I was never self-confident in my occupation although I was extremely successful until before my transition. After transition, I struggled to find and keep jobs, which also coincides with the recession and I cannot blame myself.
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: Julie Wilson on August 22, 2012, 01:15:09 PM
Post by: Julie Wilson on August 22, 2012, 01:15:09 PM
Quote from: noneatall on July 28, 2012, 06:39:51 AM
I am pre-op/non-op FT on hormones for over 5 years. I am struggling a lot now, even wondering if I really have gender dysphoria anymore.
I transitioned after my mid 20s. I started on estrogen under medical supervision following all protocols. At first, estrogen felt no different - no better and no worse. Simultaneously, I got facial hair removed. Soon, I began to look childlike, like I used to when I was 5 or 6 years old, but more girly. That change in my appearance made me feel good. I started living FT.
That good feeling encouraged me to increase estrogen dose. I even felt the urge to get SRS and feel complete. My doctor had already said that my dose was lower than needed for the female level. My doctor agreed to up the dose. I was very excited. I was so happy!
However, my sexual function began to die. My penis lost all sexual sensitivity, inside and out. I could tell if it was touched, but nothing more. The ejaculate completely disappeared. Orgasm never happened. I sometimes got close to orgasm, but it was frustratingly absent in the end.
Over months, I did everything that's been suggested to cis and trans women to reach orgasm. I even got medical assistance. My doctor reached the conclusion that I need more testosterone in my body for my sexual function to return. Under supervision, I gradually reduced estrogen dose to almost zero. My sexual function returned.
Return of my sexual function only encouraged me to get back on higher estrogen dosages and contemplate surgery. My second therapist along with a psychologist wrote letters for my SRS. I was very excited about finally being able to live as a woman and never having to tuck. That is, until my sexual function was dead again.
I went through a few more cycles of this routine of losing sexual function on high estrogen doses and feeling the need to transition with SRS while on lower doses. Eventually, I lost trust in myself. I cannot trust myself anymore around my need for SRS.
In the meantime, I was living FT. I was well accepted and well adjusted as a woman. My dysphoria had begun to disappear, except my cyclical need to increase dose and get SRS.
Now my old doubts about whether I'm trans at all have returned due to this turmoil in decision making. Given that my inner self is fickle, how do I know if I was trans at all?
I've been contemplating experimenting living as a man again. I recognize that I will look very different as a man now. However, I fear that my old gender dysphoria may return if I do.
Has anyone else gone through anything similar?
Have you tried adding Progesterone to your HRT? If not having a doctor add testosterone without having tried progesterone seems kinda prejudiced.
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: Julie Wilson on August 22, 2012, 01:32:45 PM
Post by: Julie Wilson on August 22, 2012, 01:32:45 PM
Quote from: JoanneB on July 28, 2012, 04:24:56 PMTo me it is not what is in my panties that counts. Passing and being accepted generally as a woman is what does.
I used to feel this way and I had no intention of ever getting SRS. Then my girlfriend had SRS and I realized that our relationship was over. I had no interest in her body after that. Still I was depressed and heart broken and though I thought I would never be able to afford to have SRS anyway, the funds became available to me via a loan. Because I didn't really know what else to do I went ahead and had SRS. I was in a depressed and emotionless state.
It didn't take very long for me to begin to realize that it was my genitals that had caused my GID and my worthless, nothing life. I had heard of people who hated their genitals and I couldn't relate and thought them extreme but now I was beginning to realize that my genitals were the source of all my woes. They prevented me from having female socialization, my testes producing a hormone that was entirely at odds with my being, causing facial hair growth and masculinization, even causing my skeleton to become masculine. My testes and penis were what caused the doctor to say, "It's a boy!" Thus beginning a conundrum that would sap every little bit of joy and social functionality out of my life.
I went to Marci Bowers and my SRS results were absolutely awful. Ghastly even. I couldn't allow people to see my genitals because they outted me as trans and were hideous. But I changed my name and I was able to change my gender markers on everything, DL, SOC, everything... The registration for my car, the deed to my house.
Although my SRS results were hideous I had no fear of being found out in a restroom or a locker-room as long as I didn't shave or trim down there. I was legally female which made a huge difference. Also when I bathed or went to the bathroom I wasn't reminded of the very thing that had destroyed my life. Having a vagina takes time to get used to (in my experience) it takes a while to begin having dreams with a female body. Really having a vagina opened doors for me that I wasn't even well aware of and it changed aspects of my life that I never would have imagined it could. I realize some of that is due to my physical appearance as well as my genital geography but the effects of vaginoplasty go much farther than most people can begin to realize.
ED? I don't have to worry about that. And although I didn't hate my genitals, I didn't love them either. I had no real attachment to them and my attachment lessened with time on HRT. Having a life was much more important to me than sexual function, still is. Though I do have sexual function and due to a revision by Dr. Chettawut I am no longer afraid to let someone see me naked.
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: Julie Wilson on August 22, 2012, 01:45:20 PM
Post by: Julie Wilson on August 22, 2012, 01:45:20 PM
In this life what most of us want is to be loved. For the majority of people women have a vagina and men have a penis. Sometimes we need to fit in, sometimes we can be our own creation and find someone to love us. Who am I to speak, I haven't dated since I had SRS? But I have had sex with more men than I can recollect. Not saying that's a good thing. But the freedom I experienced was a good thing, the freedom to have sex with men without giving them a trans 101 lecture or having to explain that I was a woman with a penis.
SRS and transition allowed me to be myself. However, in my own experience being myself was not something I was entirely born as. Being myself was a growing and maturing process much like what typical men and women go through. For me being a woman was something I had to grow into. I had the seed of it planted in me but it had to grow, mature... It wasn't until I was able to be perceived as female, in the streets and in the sheets that I was able to begin to get the kinds of authentic experiences that would allow me to grow.
Looking back on what my life was like before I was able to pass as a female in the streets and in the sheets, for me it was like living in limbo-land as an eternal outsider. I was never able to get any authentic experiences and I never had the satisfaction of 'being' my true self. Instead being my true self was a protest and in some ways it still is because some people know I transitioned and they tell other people about me which causes my interactions to become forced and artificial.
Anyway... Transition can be really amazing and life changing when you give it a hundred percent but in my experience when you haven't quite gotten there the merits of going all the way seem fuzzy and uncertain. I am reminded of a quote from the movie the Matrix Reloaded, "People can't see past a decision they don't understand."
SRS and transition allowed me to be myself. However, in my own experience being myself was not something I was entirely born as. Being myself was a growing and maturing process much like what typical men and women go through. For me being a woman was something I had to grow into. I had the seed of it planted in me but it had to grow, mature... It wasn't until I was able to be perceived as female, in the streets and in the sheets that I was able to begin to get the kinds of authentic experiences that would allow me to grow.
Looking back on what my life was like before I was able to pass as a female in the streets and in the sheets, for me it was like living in limbo-land as an eternal outsider. I was never able to get any authentic experiences and I never had the satisfaction of 'being' my true self. Instead being my true self was a protest and in some ways it still is because some people know I transitioned and they tell other people about me which causes my interactions to become forced and artificial.
Anyway... Transition can be really amazing and life changing when you give it a hundred percent but in my experience when you haven't quite gotten there the merits of going all the way seem fuzzy and uncertain. I am reminded of a quote from the movie the Matrix Reloaded, "People can't see past a decision they don't understand."
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: Apples Mk.II on August 22, 2012, 02:12:59 PM
Post by: Apples Mk.II on August 22, 2012, 02:12:59 PM
Quote from: noneatall on July 31, 2012, 03:40:43 AM
About 6 months before I eventually decided to transition, I began to take a DHT blocker, finasteride, which pushed my testosterone level up further. This is normal. The testosterone that did not get converted to DHT remains as testosterone, thereby increasing the total testosterone in the body. I felt more dysphoria. So, I had my doctor prescribe a stronger DHT blocker, dutasteride, which made my tesosterone level about 1/5th higher than the base level. My dysphoria got much worse.
This is a bit offtopic, but... On September I was planning to start with dutas, but since I want to bank sperm prior to transition and thing can cause malformed fetuses (or something like that), and takes 6 months to leave the body, I think I'm going to start with Finas, which only needs 1 month to leave the body so that I can store it prior to starting HRT. I think of the bank as a plan B in case I feel that I screwd it.
BTW, That's the only thing that makes me consider SRS... Social functioning. I want to be more than "the girl that hides a secret and always goes home alone at the end of the party". If I only fixed my body, The dysphoria would go away, but my problem with relationships would become harder to deal with. The only problem is making enough money for FFS and SRS...
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: JoanneB on August 22, 2012, 05:25:58 PM
Post by: JoanneB on August 22, 2012, 05:25:58 PM
Quote from: Noey Noonesson on August 22, 2012, 01:32:45 PM
I went to Marci Bowers and my SRS results were absolutely awful.
My wife is Biber baby, Marci's mentor. Her results weren't spectacular either but sort of OK. She was told back then (~20 years ago) that she might consider returning in a year or so for a labiaplasty(?) to improve the cosmetic results. She never did. I haven't heard any complaints from a couple of women in my group that went to Marci. Although they all had "complications", as did my wife. I don't know about that labiaplasty option these days. Perhaps the techniques improved?
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: Julie Wilson on August 23, 2012, 05:10:09 AM
Post by: Julie Wilson on August 23, 2012, 05:10:09 AM
I wouldn't let Marci touch me a second time. I have seen her revisions. If I could go back in time I would go to Suporn. Suporn was unworkable regarding a revision on Marci's work. Dr. Chettawut came to the rescue. Eventually if things go well I would like a second revision from Chettawut.
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: Apples Mk.II on August 23, 2012, 06:14:30 AM
Post by: Apples Mk.II on August 23, 2012, 06:14:30 AM
But is that Marcy as bad as they say? On her website it says something like "911 surgeries made up to 2011". If that many people go, it can't be that bad, is it?
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: Julie Wilson on August 23, 2012, 04:55:14 PM
Post by: Julie Wilson on August 23, 2012, 04:55:14 PM
Experience means more to people than words. SRS is an experience. People only ever have SRS once in their lives with one surgeon so generally they rate their experience based on all their other SRS experiences meaning, they have nothing to compare their experience to. If they feel good about their experience then often times they will say, "So and so is the best SRS surgeon and I am so happy with my results, you should go to him/her.
To someone who has never had a vagina, the vagina tends to be mysterious. It is especially interesting because it is so organic, It can have a lot of variation however generally it follows some anatomical rules. I have been an artist all my life and I graduated from one of the art institutes, even so it took me a while to begin to understand the basic anatomical rules or anatomy of the vulva.
M2F. They say that when a male is with a woman she is the only woman in the world. In other words when a male is with a woman the male does not compare her to other women, rather he experiences only her. When I first had SRS having gone from a male genital geography to a female genital geography I was unable to compare my vulva to the vulvae of other women and when other people told me, "Oh there is a lot of variation." I latched onto that and made myself believe it, even though I knew deep down that things were seriously wrong.
I would say do your research. Familiarize yourself with the vulva and learn to compare the work of the surgeon to the vulva's of natal females. Before you have SRS, not afterwards like I did.
Obvious problems I noticed with my results were...
1. Serious lack of symmetry.
2. Skin sewed back together, too tight in some places, with other areas that were too loose causing folds of skin hanging off the body like giant skin tags.
3. Very poorly done stitching causing exaggerated scarring.
4. Too much removal of tissue in perineal area causing vaginal vault to gape and to be exposed.
5. Urethra and clitoris touching with urethra not directly under clitoris but with urethra actually to the right of the clitoris.
6. Wide inner labia (thick) that only projected about a 1/16th of an inch or less.
7. No frenulum.
My vagina was so ugly that I actually had people tell me how ugly it was. The part that upset me was knowing they were right. I had a woman say that my vagina looked like a turkey neck, if you can imagine a turkey neck and how the skin looks like it is dripping off the neck of the turkey, that is how my outer labia looked (outer, not inner).
What bothered me the most was how Marci and her staff considered my results to be a grand success. But Marci exposed herself as a liar when she told me I wasn't experiencing necrosis to one of my inner labia, when it was obvious that I was. Also Marci only spent about six minutes total with me after the procedure, during my 9 day recovery period in the hospital.
Don't listen to what people say. Do your research and find examples of the surgeons work. Make a serious effort to familiarize yourself with the vulvae of natal women.
If Marci Bowers was an artist I would say that she is still struggling with pencil sketches. She is still learning how to look at something and reproduce it on paper. She has yet to learn anything about texture, light and shadow, color or composition. When I look at her "pencil sketches" it is obvious that something is out of whack because her perception is off.
When my girlfriend had SRS with Suporn about ten years ago I noticed amazing symmetry and everything was in the right place and more importantly everything was there, except for the clitoris, I couldn't find her clitoris. It was down in a pocket of skin, hidden. More recently when I saw a friend's results from 2-3 years ago I nearly began crying. Her results were so beautiful and amazing. Suporn had created in her a perfect vagina, un-labored, balanced and integrated. A true artist does not simply reproduce something. A true artist takes something and makes it more beautiful. It was like Suporn took all the best attributes of various vulvae and incorporated them into a masterpiece. Does he always get a result like this? No artist produces a masterpiece every time but when you set a Rembrandt against a Polly Robinson you can begin to visually separate success from attempt.
To someone who has never had a vagina, the vagina tends to be mysterious. It is especially interesting because it is so organic, It can have a lot of variation however generally it follows some anatomical rules. I have been an artist all my life and I graduated from one of the art institutes, even so it took me a while to begin to understand the basic anatomical rules or anatomy of the vulva.
M2F. They say that when a male is with a woman she is the only woman in the world. In other words when a male is with a woman the male does not compare her to other women, rather he experiences only her. When I first had SRS having gone from a male genital geography to a female genital geography I was unable to compare my vulva to the vulvae of other women and when other people told me, "Oh there is a lot of variation." I latched onto that and made myself believe it, even though I knew deep down that things were seriously wrong.
I would say do your research. Familiarize yourself with the vulva and learn to compare the work of the surgeon to the vulva's of natal females. Before you have SRS, not afterwards like I did.
Obvious problems I noticed with my results were...
1. Serious lack of symmetry.
2. Skin sewed back together, too tight in some places, with other areas that were too loose causing folds of skin hanging off the body like giant skin tags.
3. Very poorly done stitching causing exaggerated scarring.
4. Too much removal of tissue in perineal area causing vaginal vault to gape and to be exposed.
5. Urethra and clitoris touching with urethra not directly under clitoris but with urethra actually to the right of the clitoris.
6. Wide inner labia (thick) that only projected about a 1/16th of an inch or less.
7. No frenulum.
My vagina was so ugly that I actually had people tell me how ugly it was. The part that upset me was knowing they were right. I had a woman say that my vagina looked like a turkey neck, if you can imagine a turkey neck and how the skin looks like it is dripping off the neck of the turkey, that is how my outer labia looked (outer, not inner).
What bothered me the most was how Marci and her staff considered my results to be a grand success. But Marci exposed herself as a liar when she told me I wasn't experiencing necrosis to one of my inner labia, when it was obvious that I was. Also Marci only spent about six minutes total with me after the procedure, during my 9 day recovery period in the hospital.
Don't listen to what people say. Do your research and find examples of the surgeons work. Make a serious effort to familiarize yourself with the vulvae of natal women.
If Marci Bowers was an artist I would say that she is still struggling with pencil sketches. She is still learning how to look at something and reproduce it on paper. She has yet to learn anything about texture, light and shadow, color or composition. When I look at her "pencil sketches" it is obvious that something is out of whack because her perception is off.
When my girlfriend had SRS with Suporn about ten years ago I noticed amazing symmetry and everything was in the right place and more importantly everything was there, except for the clitoris, I couldn't find her clitoris. It was down in a pocket of skin, hidden. More recently when I saw a friend's results from 2-3 years ago I nearly began crying. Her results were so beautiful and amazing. Suporn had created in her a perfect vagina, un-labored, balanced and integrated. A true artist does not simply reproduce something. A true artist takes something and makes it more beautiful. It was like Suporn took all the best attributes of various vulvae and incorporated them into a masterpiece. Does he always get a result like this? No artist produces a masterpiece every time but when you set a Rembrandt against a Polly Robinson you can begin to visually separate success from attempt.
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: Apples Mk.II on August 23, 2012, 05:16:04 PM
Post by: Apples Mk.II on August 23, 2012, 05:16:04 PM
Not worth the risk for me, then. Unless I really get dysphoric with my lower part, I'm keeping the monster in its place.
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: Julie Wilson on August 23, 2012, 05:20:48 PM
Post by: Julie Wilson on August 23, 2012, 05:20:48 PM
Why, what little thing did you separate out of what I said and put all of your focus on? That an artist doesn't produce a masterpiece every time? Over the years Ford has produced a lot of Mustangs and some of them are way cooler looking than others but they are all Ford Mustangs.
If you are worried about not getting the most beautiful vagina in the world and if that is the reason for saying you aren't going to have SRS then perhaps I need to delete my post and re-write it to better express what I intended to say.
Something else to consider, what will it matter in eighty years? We all have less time than we imagine.
If you are worried about not getting the most beautiful vagina in the world and if that is the reason for saying you aren't going to have SRS then perhaps I need to delete my post and re-write it to better express what I intended to say.
Something else to consider, what will it matter in eighty years? We all have less time than we imagine.
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: Apples Mk.II on August 23, 2012, 05:45:14 PM
Post by: Apples Mk.II on August 23, 2012, 05:45:14 PM
Sorry, I wasn't talking about the aesthetic part. Since I won' be able to pay for everything and I would have to go with the social security free one,the "good looking" part does not matter a lot to me. My hands won't be femenine, nor my bulky legs, my breast will be tiny and my neck long and thick. An unnatural looking vagina would go quite OK with the rest.
The "necrosis" thing is what made me reconsider. I've been hearing things not about aesthetical, but complications, infections, one conduct that almost closed for a person, an urethra that was pointing to the incorrect side making a mess in the bathroom... I can read more and find that even Suporn can screw up with functional things.
What has made me reconsider is that this is a a serious life changing operation that not only you need to be 100% sure that you truly need this, but you need to be aware of the risks and problems it can imply. Safety and health weights more in my scale. Plus, I am not binary, and more transgender than transexual. The only point I see for taking this risk is if I felt that an incomplete body was going to alienate me from society. For me this is 50/50. I could be interested on it, but if I can live with what I have and be happy, I don't need it (yet). I mean, I hate my body and face with all my heart, I curse the T running on my organism and how it has changed me... but I'm quite ok with my penis. It is functional in my daily life, it's a part of me and it does not look very alien. I feel that I should be glad for not requiring an important surgery to be happy. For now, let's see if in three years I reconsider it if I get to completely feel like a woman.
Hope I have explained myself... Oh, BTW, I am almost asexual, so I am not very concerned about employing any genitalia at this moment. I feel more like the Ken doll. And I have a severe dislike for men, so unless that changed with time, I don't have a lot of use for a new set of genitalia.
Edit: Sure, the aesthetic part is a bit important, but... If I can't pay, I would have to take what they offer. What I don't want is something that will affect the quality of my daily life, be painful when I walk or do sports... Not everything is sex and love for me.
The "necrosis" thing is what made me reconsider. I've been hearing things not about aesthetical, but complications, infections, one conduct that almost closed for a person, an urethra that was pointing to the incorrect side making a mess in the bathroom... I can read more and find that even Suporn can screw up with functional things.
What has made me reconsider is that this is a a serious life changing operation that not only you need to be 100% sure that you truly need this, but you need to be aware of the risks and problems it can imply. Safety and health weights more in my scale. Plus, I am not binary, and more transgender than transexual. The only point I see for taking this risk is if I felt that an incomplete body was going to alienate me from society. For me this is 50/50. I could be interested on it, but if I can live with what I have and be happy, I don't need it (yet). I mean, I hate my body and face with all my heart, I curse the T running on my organism and how it has changed me... but I'm quite ok with my penis. It is functional in my daily life, it's a part of me and it does not look very alien. I feel that I should be glad for not requiring an important surgery to be happy. For now, let's see if in three years I reconsider it if I get to completely feel like a woman.
Hope I have explained myself... Oh, BTW, I am almost asexual, so I am not very concerned about employing any genitalia at this moment. I feel more like the Ken doll. And I have a severe dislike for men, so unless that changed with time, I don't have a lot of use for a new set of genitalia.
Edit: Sure, the aesthetic part is a bit important, but... If I can't pay, I would have to take what they offer. What I don't want is something that will affect the quality of my daily life, be painful when I walk or do sports... Not everything is sex and love for me.
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: Julie Wilson on August 24, 2012, 07:07:16 PM
Post by: Julie Wilson on August 24, 2012, 07:07:16 PM
For me just being rid of the testes made SRS worth it.
Using my previous anatomy for sex caused me some serious depression.
I would have been better without anything down there than with what I had.
Complications are pretty rare and most people aren't able to distinguish a Rembrandt from a Polly Robinson anyway which explains the AMC Pacer, Gremlin and Matador, not to mention the Hornet.
I feel like transition should be avoided unless it is absolutely necessary. Transition can create a new set of problems and it has to be worth it to give an individual the resolve to overcome those new problems. If you are living as your true sex 24/7 and you are happy that is all that matters. I need to incorporate non-trans reality with my own and I do that by fitting into non-trans reality. I had to have the right body to do that. There was a time when I felt happy just being in a relationship with another woman who was transitioning but by the very definition of transition that relationship was transitory. (It wasn't going to last).
I can pick out a million things that are wrong with my body, well at least a hundred or so anyway.
Using my previous anatomy for sex caused me some serious depression.
I would have been better without anything down there than with what I had.
Complications are pretty rare and most people aren't able to distinguish a Rembrandt from a Polly Robinson anyway which explains the AMC Pacer, Gremlin and Matador, not to mention the Hornet.
I feel like transition should be avoided unless it is absolutely necessary. Transition can create a new set of problems and it has to be worth it to give an individual the resolve to overcome those new problems. If you are living as your true sex 24/7 and you are happy that is all that matters. I need to incorporate non-trans reality with my own and I do that by fitting into non-trans reality. I had to have the right body to do that. There was a time when I felt happy just being in a relationship with another woman who was transitioning but by the very definition of transition that relationship was transitory. (It wasn't going to last).
I can pick out a million things that are wrong with my body, well at least a hundred or so anyway.
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: Elena G on August 24, 2012, 07:42:26 PM
Post by: Elena G on August 24, 2012, 07:42:26 PM
Quote from: Noey Noonesson on August 24, 2012, 07:07:16 PM
For me just being rid of the testes made SRS worth it.
Using my previous anatomy for sex caused me some serious depression.
I would have been better without anything down there than with what I had.
Complications are pretty rare and most people aren't able to distinguish a Rembrandt from a Polly Robinson anyway which explains the AMC Pacer, Gremlin and Matador, not to mention the Hornet.
I feel like transition should be avoided unless it is absolutely necessary. Transition can create a new set of problems and it has to be worth it to give an individual the resolve to overcome those new problems. If you are living as your true sex 24/7 and you are happy that is all that matters. I need to incorporate non-trans reality with my own and I do that by fitting into non-trans reality. I had to have the right body to do that. There was a time when I felt happy just being in a relationship with another woman who was transitioning but by the very definition of transition that relationship was transitory. (It wasn't going to last).
I can pick out a million things that are wrong with my body, well at least a hundred or so anyway.
FWIW, I am learning so much from reading your posts. Hope to put these lessons into practice, one day.
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: Apples Mk.II on August 25, 2012, 02:55:55 AM
Post by: Apples Mk.II on August 25, 2012, 02:55:55 AM
Inside me I think I know that SRS is the final goal and sooner or later I would do it, but... It's too difficult to accept. For the moment I have managed to accept that I want to change my body, face, the way people see me... But that last stage is too difficult to decide for me. Removing the testes would be enough for me and is something I wolud do quickly for health reasons, but the vaginoplasty... Giving away a part of your body is something that requires consideration.
Not to mention that I would not know what to do with a neovagina... Unless I start to be interested in men at a more concious level, I am still stuck in lesbian mode.
Or maybe... I guess the wall between SRS and me is that I don't want to do it unless they can guarantee a decent result, bot aesthetically and functionally. I've never liked taking risks, and If I know myself to have an incredible hate for specific parts of my body, I don't want to think about what can happen If I am stuck with a hideous set of genitalia. At least what I have now looks decent. If only it worked decently...
Not to mention that I would not know what to do with a neovagina... Unless I start to be interested in men at a more concious level, I am still stuck in lesbian mode.
Or maybe... I guess the wall between SRS and me is that I don't want to do it unless they can guarantee a decent result, bot aesthetically and functionally. I've never liked taking risks, and If I know myself to have an incredible hate for specific parts of my body, I don't want to think about what can happen If I am stuck with a hideous set of genitalia. At least what I have now looks decent. If only it worked decently...
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: Julie Wilson on August 25, 2012, 04:45:25 AM
Post by: Julie Wilson on August 25, 2012, 04:45:25 AM
I am sure Marci Bowers has gotten better even though I wouldn't recommend her to anyone.
Just take your life one day at a time. No reason to get up in your head or try to make decisions for the future. I try to stay out of my head, sometimes I succeed.
Just take your life one day at a time. No reason to get up in your head or try to make decisions for the future. I try to stay out of my head, sometimes I succeed.
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: justmeinoz on August 25, 2012, 06:06:16 AM
Post by: justmeinoz on August 25, 2012, 06:06:16 AM
Up until the last few days I was inclined to think I would be happy with an Orchiectomy for a number of reasons. I am beginning to get a few emotional and psychological issues sorted, and have noticed that I am beginning to reconsider my sexuality as a result.
I have no doubt that I am a woman, but I am beginning to feel that I was rejecting the idea of an attraction to men as a the result of conflating homophobic bullying when younger, unsatisfactory sexual experiences while trying to disentangle my gender from sexuality, and a few other issues.
Subconsciously I was saying that men had hurt me in the past; gay men don't want to have sex with women, so no problem there; and straight men don't want a partner with a vagina, so if I don't have SRS I won't have to worry about being hurt, because straight men won't want me either. Never having been in a Lesbian relationship, and hurt in such, I will therefore be safe. Obviously not true, but then it's the subconscious we are dealing with here. Logic doesn't apply.
Now that I am feeling more comfortable with the idea of sex with a straight guy, as well as with women, some of the rejection of surgery is receding as well. Whether my phobias about any form of surgical procedure will ever totally disappear I can't say, but my subconscious seems to have given up one objection at least.
Karen.
PS. I always thought the Rambler Hornet was one of the few American cars that was comparable to the local product, and looked half decent as well.
I have no doubt that I am a woman, but I am beginning to feel that I was rejecting the idea of an attraction to men as a the result of conflating homophobic bullying when younger, unsatisfactory sexual experiences while trying to disentangle my gender from sexuality, and a few other issues.
Subconsciously I was saying that men had hurt me in the past; gay men don't want to have sex with women, so no problem there; and straight men don't want a partner with a vagina, so if I don't have SRS I won't have to worry about being hurt, because straight men won't want me either. Never having been in a Lesbian relationship, and hurt in such, I will therefore be safe. Obviously not true, but then it's the subconscious we are dealing with here. Logic doesn't apply.
Now that I am feeling more comfortable with the idea of sex with a straight guy, as well as with women, some of the rejection of surgery is receding as well. Whether my phobias about any form of surgical procedure will ever totally disappear I can't say, but my subconscious seems to have given up one objection at least.
Karen.
PS. I always thought the Rambler Hornet was one of the few American cars that was comparable to the local product, and looked half decent as well.
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: Julie Wilson on August 25, 2012, 06:25:33 AM
Post by: Julie Wilson on August 25, 2012, 06:25:33 AM
Being female is something that can happen on many levels. Some females never transition and spend their lives living as male. Some females transition socially but not sexually. Some women have penises. I want to be female on every level so that my interactions will always be authentic. Will I ever really have that on a meaningful level with someone I love? I don't know.
Sometimes we want something because we can't have it. What if we could have it, then what?
Sometimes we want something because we can't have it. What if we could have it, then what?
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: justmeinoz on August 25, 2012, 06:30:44 AM
Post by: justmeinoz on August 25, 2012, 06:30:44 AM
It will be interesting to see where this all goes.
Up until recently I was content being a woman with a penis, and possession of one by another woman was not an issue at all. On others it still isn't unattractive.
For myself though, I seem to have slightly opened a door I thought was shut forever, and have discovered that what is on the other side may not be as bad as I thought.
Up until recently I was content being a woman with a penis, and possession of one by another woman was not an issue at all. On others it still isn't unattractive.
For myself though, I seem to have slightly opened a door I thought was shut forever, and have discovered that what is on the other side may not be as bad as I thought.
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: Apples Mk.II on August 25, 2012, 07:56:26 AM
Post by: Apples Mk.II on August 25, 2012, 07:56:26 AM
Quote from: Noey Noonesson on August 25, 2012, 04:45:25 AM
I am sure Marci Bowers has gotten better even though I wouldn't recommend her to anyone.
Obviously I would never go, since I would be sticking with european or thai surgeons. I have nothing to do with the U.S.
The issue is... Being the "penis woman" is quite ok during the transition stage, when I am still in the middle, not that much interested in sex, etc... The problem is that I just come from 10 years of awkwardness and solitude, and I don't want to spend the remaining ten of my youth in the same way.
Let's say that I can find a romantic partner that would be OK with my "out of place" genitalia, be it a cis woman, or another trans person. Then I would not need it, if I have support and love from somebody. But what if I risk being alone and the same as usual, the "awkward friend" that is more of a variety show each time he appears? Then I am pretty much ->-bleeped-<-ed up and I would go with SRS, just for safety.
I am in the weird point where I can live witch each genitalia. I'd love having a neovagina but I don't hate the oscar mayer as much as to think about self castration. The deciding point would be:
a) If after completing the rest of transition steps I feel whole or not.
b) If the "incomplete" status is again blocking me from having a normal social life. I am too afraid of being alone again and there Is when I could risk depression and suicidal thoughts.
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: ShawnaB on August 25, 2012, 09:31:45 AM
Post by: ShawnaB on August 25, 2012, 09:31:45 AM
I had relatively high levels of both testosterone and oestrogen before starting hrt. The main thing that's shifted for me is that I feel no sense of urgency with anything in my transition, and almost no need to do anything more than "part time". I've even seriously reconsidered my intentions for SRS. My libido has changed and my preferences seem to have come undone, or completely opened up.
There were some weird hiccups starting hrt and at the moment, it feels like there's more testosterone in my system again. And since this latest adjustment, with the increased sensation of testosterone, I'm a bit more confused but I know that actually I can't go back.
Despite the lack of urgency, I know for me there is one path and what Noey has said in this thread to date has really resonated with me, and the following in particular:
I'm not there yet. I actually can't stand the in between state. Life as a guy will never work for me and wasn't ever going to. Anything less than full transition won't either. But that's just me.
And I've also discovered how many people have different interpretations and intentions. I have one close and very supportive friend who balked at the desire for SRS with respect to physical intimacy. When I mentioned bikinis she was all for it. (I didn't feel like get into tucking or anything like that.)
There were some weird hiccups starting hrt and at the moment, it feels like there's more testosterone in my system again. And since this latest adjustment, with the increased sensation of testosterone, I'm a bit more confused but I know that actually I can't go back.
Despite the lack of urgency, I know for me there is one path and what Noey has said in this thread to date has really resonated with me, and the following in particular:
Quote from: Noey Noonesson on August 22, 2012, 01:45:20 PM
SRS and transition allowed me to be myself. However, in my own experience being myself was not something I was entirely born as. Being myself was a growing and maturing process much like what typical men and women go through. For me being a woman was something I had to grow into. I had the seed of it planted in me but it had to grow, mature... It wasn't until I was able to be perceived as female, in the streets and in the sheets that I was able to begin to get the kinds of authentic experiences that would allow me to grow.
Looking back on what my life was like before I was able to pass as a female in the streets and in the sheets, for me it was like living in limbo-land as an eternal outsider. I was never able to get any authentic experiences and I never had the satisfaction of 'being' my true self. Instead being my true self was a protest and in some ways it still is because some people know I transitioned and they tell other people about me which causes my interactions to become forced and artificial.
I'm not there yet. I actually can't stand the in between state. Life as a guy will never work for me and wasn't ever going to. Anything less than full transition won't either. But that's just me.
And I've also discovered how many people have different interpretations and intentions. I have one close and very supportive friend who balked at the desire for SRS with respect to physical intimacy. When I mentioned bikinis she was all for it. (I didn't feel like get into tucking or anything like that.)
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: Julie Wilson on August 25, 2012, 05:39:22 PM
Post by: Julie Wilson on August 25, 2012, 05:39:22 PM
I am reminded of that quote from the Matrix Reloaded, "People can't see beyond a decision they are unable to understand.
I am not a very smart or independent person. I was more like a human animal. I was punished when I did wrong and after years of being punished whenever I did wrong I began to punish myself whenever I felt like I had let others down. I was just thinking and I realized that I was never rewarded for when I did right. My parents weren't big on rewarding and I never learned to reward myself.
I thought I would be happy having a penis as long as I could be with someone like my transitioning (pre-op) girlfriend. But in order to live like that my social circle had the quality of an artificial environment. I was pretty grossed out by SRS results. I certainly wasn't attracted to SRS results. After I had SRS I lived as a male for a full year. I was too scared to go full-time. Honestly I don't know how some of you people do it.
The way I came out was at a company party, I told the plant manager who I knew would tell everyone else. I didn't work there, I was a supplier but I had to interact with lots of people who would soon know my secret. I used that plant manager to overcome my fears.
Being a man or a woman is action, 'being', not a collection of things. Some people collect things, surgeries, shoes... Collecting isn't being, collecting is a substitute for being. When I was young I used to collect all sorts of things. I was trying to fill the dark empty void that was my life.
Women have a history of having been women. When your history of having been a woman is living as a man to hide the fact that somehow you have always been female... That isn't much of a history. If you had all the surgeries, took all the hormones and changed your wardrobe but everyone knows you as so and so who transitioned, well my personal experience of that is it isn't much of a history of having been female and it's not much of a life.
"People can't see beyond a decision they are unable to understand."
I never had a life so I didn't know anything about living. I didn't understand any of the things I talk about until they sorta whacked me upside of the head. The first life-changing experience I had was ending up in a hotel room with a guy who had no idea I had transitioned. He kept demanding to know if I was on birth control, threatening me saying if I got pregnant and tried to ruin his life how he would kill me. I had just assumed he knew I was trans.
I wasn't able to understand how SRS and transition could change my life because I never had a life in the first place. I never had anything of my own. I had spent my entire life trying to please others and I had never been rewarded for being good. My reward for being good was not being punished.
Transition allowed me to have the first authentic living experiences in my life, for the first time in my life I was alive and living. I don't think I could have understood or appreciated if someone had tried to explain these experiences to me, I had to live them for myself in order to appreciate them and in order for those experiences to change my beliefs about myself and life.
If I was just a guy who transitioned, a guy with boobs and a vagina and if I was only intimate with people who knew my internal dialogue then living like that would produce more of the same. The experience of being a guy who looks like a girl in relationships with people who were willing to have sex with a guy who looks like a girl. Fortunately life took the reins and did the driving for me because I would have spent the rest of my life driving in circles.
We are our experiences, they shape us and allow us to grow. They say about small businesses that if your small business isn't growing it's dying. That is true about small businesses and it's also true about people. Stasis is not living.
I was very lucky because without my experiences I would be the same person I was before transition with a few accessories. Having had the experiences that I have had the thought of living like that is no longer tolerable.
I am not a very smart or independent person. I was more like a human animal. I was punished when I did wrong and after years of being punished whenever I did wrong I began to punish myself whenever I felt like I had let others down. I was just thinking and I realized that I was never rewarded for when I did right. My parents weren't big on rewarding and I never learned to reward myself.
I thought I would be happy having a penis as long as I could be with someone like my transitioning (pre-op) girlfriend. But in order to live like that my social circle had the quality of an artificial environment. I was pretty grossed out by SRS results. I certainly wasn't attracted to SRS results. After I had SRS I lived as a male for a full year. I was too scared to go full-time. Honestly I don't know how some of you people do it.
The way I came out was at a company party, I told the plant manager who I knew would tell everyone else. I didn't work there, I was a supplier but I had to interact with lots of people who would soon know my secret. I used that plant manager to overcome my fears.
Being a man or a woman is action, 'being', not a collection of things. Some people collect things, surgeries, shoes... Collecting isn't being, collecting is a substitute for being. When I was young I used to collect all sorts of things. I was trying to fill the dark empty void that was my life.
Women have a history of having been women. When your history of having been a woman is living as a man to hide the fact that somehow you have always been female... That isn't much of a history. If you had all the surgeries, took all the hormones and changed your wardrobe but everyone knows you as so and so who transitioned, well my personal experience of that is it isn't much of a history of having been female and it's not much of a life.
"People can't see beyond a decision they are unable to understand."
I never had a life so I didn't know anything about living. I didn't understand any of the things I talk about until they sorta whacked me upside of the head. The first life-changing experience I had was ending up in a hotel room with a guy who had no idea I had transitioned. He kept demanding to know if I was on birth control, threatening me saying if I got pregnant and tried to ruin his life how he would kill me. I had just assumed he knew I was trans.
I wasn't able to understand how SRS and transition could change my life because I never had a life in the first place. I never had anything of my own. I had spent my entire life trying to please others and I had never been rewarded for being good. My reward for being good was not being punished.
Transition allowed me to have the first authentic living experiences in my life, for the first time in my life I was alive and living. I don't think I could have understood or appreciated if someone had tried to explain these experiences to me, I had to live them for myself in order to appreciate them and in order for those experiences to change my beliefs about myself and life.
If I was just a guy who transitioned, a guy with boobs and a vagina and if I was only intimate with people who knew my internal dialogue then living like that would produce more of the same. The experience of being a guy who looks like a girl in relationships with people who were willing to have sex with a guy who looks like a girl. Fortunately life took the reins and did the driving for me because I would have spent the rest of my life driving in circles.
We are our experiences, they shape us and allow us to grow. They say about small businesses that if your small business isn't growing it's dying. That is true about small businesses and it's also true about people. Stasis is not living.
I was very lucky because without my experiences I would be the same person I was before transition with a few accessories. Having had the experiences that I have had the thought of living like that is no longer tolerable.
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: Apples Mk.II on August 25, 2012, 05:55:44 PM
Post by: Apples Mk.II on August 25, 2012, 05:55:44 PM
Quote from: Noey Noonesson on August 25, 2012, 05:39:22 PM
I certainly wasn't attracted to SRS results. After I had SRS I lived as a male for a full year. I was too scared to go full-time. Honestly I don't know how some of you people do it.
Until now I was not able to realise it. I can now understand the amount of pain you have had to endure , and I wish I would have a tenth part of the courage and resolve you had to face life and take it back.
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: Julie Wilson on August 25, 2012, 06:06:14 PM
Post by: Julie Wilson on August 25, 2012, 06:06:14 PM
I'm glad there are so many amazing people on this forum. Thank you ^_^ .
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: Christine on September 07, 2012, 05:04:42 PM
Post by: Christine on September 07, 2012, 05:04:42 PM
I am new here so I hope it is OK to express an opinion. I just discovered this board and would like to help others if possible. As background I had an orchiectomy 10 years ago. Don't get hung up on SRS, it is not the only option. Go with what feels right to that inner voice and dont let the phrases and conventional wisdom necessarily direct you one way or another. (with all due respect to that wisdom) it is not the only way. For some complete SRS will be mandatory for others like me no.
I was lucky enough to hook up with a great therapist who really encouraged and challenged me to answer tough questions. I can tell you the orchiectomy was a great benefit to me and have never regretted one second. I dress as a man much of the time but live as a woman. I discovered clothes were really not relevant to who I am. Its how I feel that matters. Inside I feel like a woman and to men I act like one. I have lost all my arm hair etc and my skin has feminized. And I like it. I still wear a bra and panties but thats because my breasts have grown quite a bit and need support for everyday living. I wear panties because well with nothing down their mens underwear simply doesn't fit.
I live in a world of emotions, compassion and yes I like chic flicks and often cry. It feels wonderful. Am I male, female, TS I don't know and quite frankly I am not sure It matters anymore. Maybe I am inbetween. I quit using labels because I found myself making up "feelings and thoughts" to fit in those labels and satisfy others. I am who I am and thats the place you must get to. You must also take into account your spouse if any, because if its a great relationship that is important to your mental health as well. Lastly sexuality with yourself and partner are important to a healthy being. I am lucky my sex life is intact and I can orgasm although it is distinctly different and I much prefer my orgasms now vs then. I hope this helps you. Its about balance and you must find the balance that works for you.
I was lucky enough to hook up with a great therapist who really encouraged and challenged me to answer tough questions. I can tell you the orchiectomy was a great benefit to me and have never regretted one second. I dress as a man much of the time but live as a woman. I discovered clothes were really not relevant to who I am. Its how I feel that matters. Inside I feel like a woman and to men I act like one. I have lost all my arm hair etc and my skin has feminized. And I like it. I still wear a bra and panties but thats because my breasts have grown quite a bit and need support for everyday living. I wear panties because well with nothing down their mens underwear simply doesn't fit.
I live in a world of emotions, compassion and yes I like chic flicks and often cry. It feels wonderful. Am I male, female, TS I don't know and quite frankly I am not sure It matters anymore. Maybe I am inbetween. I quit using labels because I found myself making up "feelings and thoughts" to fit in those labels and satisfy others. I am who I am and thats the place you must get to. You must also take into account your spouse if any, because if its a great relationship that is important to your mental health as well. Lastly sexuality with yourself and partner are important to a healthy being. I am lucky my sex life is intact and I can orgasm although it is distinctly different and I much prefer my orgasms now vs then. I hope this helps you. Its about balance and you must find the balance that works for you.
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: Julie Wilson on September 07, 2012, 07:31:43 PM
Post by: Julie Wilson on September 07, 2012, 07:31:43 PM
I think most younger people who transition want to be able to have sexual relationships that are not GID evoking so SRS tends to be more important depending upon the age that one transitions. Especially if a person wants to be able to draw from a larger pool of potential mates.
Title: Re: Wavering a lot on the extent of transition
Post by: Stephe on September 07, 2012, 08:35:15 PM
Post by: Stephe on September 07, 2012, 08:35:15 PM
This is about "quality of life", nothing more.
I would assume you didn't like living as a man, so why go back to that? This isn't an either or thing. Just because you don't like how you feel on high E doses doesn't mean you aren't trans or should go back to living as a man. I would not want to get to where I never enjoyed sex/never had another orgasm just to fit into some prescribed notion of what we are supposed to do if we are "really trans".
If you're happy living as a woman on lower doses of E and no surgery, then just do that. I'm very happy where I am right now and don't plan to change just so I fit "this is what a real transexual woman would do" line. It's about making yourself happy, not what others think you should do.
I would assume you didn't like living as a man, so why go back to that? This isn't an either or thing. Just because you don't like how you feel on high E doses doesn't mean you aren't trans or should go back to living as a man. I would not want to get to where I never enjoyed sex/never had another orgasm just to fit into some prescribed notion of what we are supposed to do if we are "really trans".
If you're happy living as a woman on lower doses of E and no surgery, then just do that. I'm very happy where I am right now and don't plan to change just so I fit "this is what a real transexual woman would do" line. It's about making yourself happy, not what others think you should do.