Community Conversation => Female to male transsexual talk (FTM) => Transsexual talk => FTM Gear => Topic started by: Ribbons on January 22, 2013, 11:04:40 PM Return to Full Version
Title: Is a 4 incher really that small?
Post by: Ribbons on January 22, 2013, 11:04:40 PM
Post by: Ribbons on January 22, 2013, 11:04:40 PM
I hear people complain about certain packers sizes a lot. Like the Limpy, at 3.5 inches, and the Masho at 4 inches. I've never got that though.
The average flaccid is less than 4 inches so what's the problem?
The average flaccid is less than 4 inches so what's the problem?
Title: Re: Is a 4 incher really that small?
Post by: Jayr on January 23, 2013, 12:06:55 AM
Post by: Jayr on January 23, 2013, 12:06:55 AM
It's not the size that many are complaining about.
It's the fact that the smaller sizes tend to stick out like boners.
:P
It's the fact that the smaller sizes tend to stick out like boners.
:P
Title: Re: Is a 4 incher really that small?
Post by: CursedFireDean on January 23, 2013, 01:57:01 PM
Post by: CursedFireDean on January 23, 2013, 01:57:01 PM
The limpy sticks out but from what I've seen, the Masho doesn't
I think from what I've heard, (of course, this is just what I've heard, I'm sure there are other opinions) that people tend to like the girth of packers like the 4" sailor more than that of the MASHO.
And then with the Limpy, I imagine it's the boner look.
I think from what I've heard, (of course, this is just what I've heard, I'm sure there are other opinions) that people tend to like the girth of packers like the 4" sailor more than that of the MASHO.
And then with the Limpy, I imagine it's the boner look.
Title: Re: Is a 4 incher really that small?
Post by: Seb on January 26, 2013, 02:52:58 AM
Post by: Seb on January 26, 2013, 02:52:58 AM
I think also a lot of men in general (both cis and not) don't realize the average size of a man's parts. It tends to get over-exaggerated but honestly I'd rather nothing stood out than have something huge downstairs to draw attention to.
I think part of it is also compensating, to be honest.
I think part of it is also compensating, to be honest.
Title: Re: Is a 4 incher really that small?
Post by: aleon515 on January 26, 2013, 10:25:49 AM
Post by: aleon515 on January 26, 2013, 10:25:49 AM
The Sailor (I think 4") and the RM Basic Packer (4 1/2") don't make boners either. The 4" Mr. Limpy is actually HUGE in my opinion. Absolutely the only way to wear it is to get a sock and stick in your boxer briefs.
Average boy parts flaccid are something like 3-4 1/2".
--Jay
Average boy parts flaccid are something like 3-4 1/2".
--Jay
Title: Re: Is a 4 incher really that small?
Post by: anibioman on January 31, 2013, 10:49:59 PM
Post by: anibioman on January 31, 2013, 10:49:59 PM
i never have the problem of my limpy looking like a boner and i like the size.
Title: Re: Is a 4 incher really that small?
Post by: JackSG1 on January 31, 2013, 10:53:56 PM
Post by: JackSG1 on January 31, 2013, 10:53:56 PM
I like the peecock...sits nicely:)
Title: Re: Is a 4 incher really that small?
Post by: King Malachite on January 31, 2013, 10:55:29 PM
Post by: King Malachite on January 31, 2013, 10:55:29 PM
No problem at all for me. I love my Mr. Limpy size and the fact that it makes me look like I have a boner (I only wear it at home.). I can barely keep my Mr. Limpy in my underwear so I don't need anything larger that can flop over.
Title: Re: Is a 4 incher really that small?
Post by: Beth Andrea on January 31, 2013, 11:27:15 PM
Post by: Beth Andrea on January 31, 2013, 11:27:15 PM
Quote from: aleon515 on January 26, 2013, 10:25:49 AM
The Sailor (I think 4") and the RM Basic Packer (4 1/2") don't make boners either. The 4" Mr. Limpy is actually HUGE in my opinion. Absolutely the only way to wear it is to get a sock and stick in your boxer briefs.
Average boy parts flaccid are something like 3-4 1/2".
--Jay
Unless one has been swimming in cold-d-d-d water...LOL. Then think "large thimble size" ;)
Also, trivia: flaccid, most OEM tools are between 2" and 4"...yet all are close to the same size erect (average ~6"). Thus the term, "show-er" and "go-er"...the large flaccid *looks* impressive, but isn't when it gets up..."Oh, is that all?" ("all show") whereas the shorty, since it nearly triples its length, supposedly inspires "OMG! Wow!"-type comments ("all go").
Title: Re: Is a 4 incher really that small?
Post by: kelly_aus on February 01, 2013, 05:01:35 AM
Post by: kelly_aus on February 01, 2013, 05:01:35 AM
4" flaccid small? Nope.. From my experience, it's on the bigger end for a flaccid penis - and as Beth mentioned, the bigger they are flaccid, the less they grow.. ;)
Title: Re: Is a 4 incher really that small?
Post by: chuck on February 01, 2013, 10:37:15 AM
Post by: chuck on February 01, 2013, 10:37:15 AM
3.5 is average flaccid. 5.5 is average erect. Average erect girth is 4.9