Susan's Place Transgender Resources

Saw this store today http://www.freetomprosthetics.com/
Their products show a similar design as the Peecock, but better priced and better looking IMO.
Just wanted to share this and to see if anyone has experience with this company

Has anyone purchase one of these?  How long does it to receive it? Are there any reviews out?

I follow this guy on youtube, so he looks really familiar to me. Don't know anything about this, but looks like the product fills a nice spot as a low end prosthetic (competitor to RM packers, peecock, and Likereal). No info how the 4 in 1 is "pleasure", looks good though.

--Jay

It's not meant to be glued to you (according to what's written). The site also does not guarantee it for sex. I understand that it might be a liability issue but hopefully it gets to a point where there's a warranty if the item is used as intended and has a problem within the first month.

Quote from: Nygeel on August 07, 2014, 02:22:14 PM
It's not meant to be glued to you (according to what's written). The site also does not guarantee it for sex. I understand that it might be a liability issue but hopefully it gets to a point where there's a warranty if the item is used as intended and has a problem within the first month.

Yeah, RM has a statement re: sex. Now obviously it's made for using in sex but they need to CTA. :)
I'm looking forward to seeing how well he does with this.

Another thing I thought was amusing is all the models with the commando type positions. They do look good esp for the price.

--Jay

I just would like to see pictures of the funnel and more details about how the erection rod works.

Yes, I'm not trying to compare their products with RM either, just thought that it might be an alternative to the peecock, if the company is actually legit.

I don't expect too much from the erection rod either. I have a peecock and a FTM Prosthetics dual; both contain an erection rod and I have found the lengths of the rods are not long enough to extend to the heads so the heads are just not firm enough. But if the rods were long enough to reach the heads, there would be greater risks of the rods breaking through. :(

Those look pretty awesome, I hope someone comes forward with a review or intends to buy one.

Yeah I'd ask for a sample to review on my youtube channel, but can't really wear it anyway everyday and couldn't probably pee out of it. :)

I wouldn't expect much for the rod. I'd guess it's not perfect either.

Oh well. Anyone with a popular channel (not saying I am there yet though)? That's an idea.

Glad to see a trans guy in the US making such a product.

--Jay

Interesting concept. It's a relatively new store/website from what I know, so I'll hold onto my money for now and see if any reviews come out. Until then, I'll be waiting for my eroticreations prosthetic to arrive and see how happy I am with that. ^_^

I'm actually waiting for reviews myself. I've followed their Instagram and such and seen the product. looks promising, but after learning about The Ultimate Prosthetic, I'd wait for reviews to come out before purchasing.

I've seen it and saw Jason Robert Ballard (?) do a small review with pictures on it on a forum or something on Facebook but I can't seem to find it. Maybe that's a lead that someone else can take but I'm not coming up with anything anymore.
Noting this because he had taken a picture of the receptacle and stuff...

these actually look nice...if good reviews come up ill be very tempted to buy one..havent had a desire for one but..now ;)

How about we all pitch in for the Nygeel Needs a Penis Fund? Once money is raised I'll get one, use it for a week then review it.

(Note: I'm not actually doing this but it's a good idea...for science)

I'm curious they display pictures of masturbating with them...or what seems to be. Is this a normal ability for prosthetics?

Did I just imagine this or was there a major price jump between when this was posted and now?

Quote from: Nygeel on August 09, 2014, 10:21:08 PM
Did I just imagine this or was there a major price jump between when this was posted and now?

I'm pretty sure I saw $99 when I posted this...
At least now I don't need to think about it any more. I will definitely not pay $250+...

I saw people price is at $99 but the only thing I was seeing for $99 was the paint upgrade... Even days ago.

I think some items were listed as clearence but now just upgrades are clearance.

There was a BIG jump in price! You aren't imagining. I believe one day they were $99 or $110. It was some kind of deal he was offering. They are less competitive at $250, but could still be a good price, depending. They are more in the price range of LikeReal's or Emisil's higher price ones or something. I think he needs better photos if he wants to charge the big bucks. I'm not saying they aren't good, just that the pictures don't indicate how much detail he has. They also should be optionally adhesive on for that, imo.

@Skylusk: masturbating with a toy, well it's possible, depending. However, it was more my view that they are meant to be sexy photos, showing off a causal sort of cismale type attitude, with one hand on the remote and the other.....

@Nygel's penis fund, please contribute. LOL. :)



--Jay

Quote from: aleon515 on August 09, 2014, 11:37:22 PM
@Skylusk: masturbating with a toy, well it's possible, depending. However, it was more my view that they are meant to be sexy photos, showing off a causal sort of cismale type attitude, with one hand on the remote and the other.....

Yeah it's possible, it does mention a "FtM Pleasure Slide" but it's not clearly pictured. Would definitely want more info about that before a purchase. I sometimes jerk off with my feeldoe, when I'm not feeling too lazy to clean it.

I've been following this company on Tumblr for a while and yes, the $99 price point was a one day deal.  They literally just opened on August 1st after moving their business to the US, so they had at a lot of deals and contests and such to celebrate, including a clearance section for slightly imperfect models.  It looks like they've now sold out of those and the $99 deal has ended, so.

I could have sworn I saw pics of the pleasure slide somewhere. I'll go look.

EDIT: Here it is...
(https://www.susans.org/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F38.media.tumblr.com%2Ff5b95154743d3792734837485c09a820%2Ftumblr_n7p52e8TtE1tbelwyo3_1280.jpg&hash=b0573c1c14b7283b9ed28cccb97c4f2d83f5f785)

Link: http://freetomprosthetics.tumblr.com/post/89803996596/we-are-so-excited-to-share-this-sneak-peek-of-our

It also looks like they are/were working on an inflatable model called the A1?
http://freetomprosthetics.tumblr.com/post/85574197811/finally-a-sneak-peek-at-our-newest-a1-model-note

Quote from: Nowhereboi on August 11, 2014, 09:25:59 AM
I've been following this company on Tumblr for a while and yes, the $99 price point was a one day deal.  They literally just opened on August 1st after moving their business to the US, so they had at a lot of deals and contests and such to celebrate, including a clearance section for slightly imperfect models.  It looks like they've now sold out of those and the $99 deal has ended, so.

I could have sworn I saw pics of the pleasure slide somewhere. I'll go look.

EDIT: Here it is...
(https://www.susans.org/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F38.media.tumblr.com%2Ff5b95154743d3792734837485c09a820%2Ftumblr_n7p52e8TtE1tbelwyo3_1280.jpg&hash=b0573c1c14b7283b9ed28cccb97c4f2d83f5f785)

Link: http://freetomprosthetics.tumblr.com/post/89803996596/we-are-so-excited-to-share-this-sneak-peek-of-our

It also looks like they are/were working on an inflatable model called the A1?
http://freetomprosthetics.tumblr.com/post/85574197811/finally-a-sneak-peek-at-our-newest-a1-model-note

Inflatable model? Not bad.. As far as I know only Tyron has that kind of technology as well. If FreeTom's prosthetics would be definitely for adhesive use, then they've got my money.

Quote from: Maleth on August 11, 2014, 11:06:45 AM
Inflatable model? Not bad.. As far as I know only Tyron has that kind of technology as well. If FreeTom's prosthetics would be definitely for adhesive use, then they've got my money.

I don't see that there's a tab but I have heard of people attaching prosthetics without much in the way of tabs, ymmv. I wouldn't gather the materials would not work but where to put it.

It's a nice looking product.

--Jay

Quote from: aleon515 on August 11, 2014, 01:30:52 PM
I don't see that there's a tab but I have heard of people attaching prosthetics without much in the way of tabs, ymmv. I wouldn't gather the materials would not work but where to put it.

It's a nice looking product.

--Jay

I was gonna jump the gun and order from FreeTom , but I'm gonna hold off for now and save up for whenever their inflatable prosthetic comes out. Who knows, I might even be happy with my Eroticreations one.. my only concern is size whereas FreeTom has a lot more options and variety. The 4.5 inch one especially is good for smaller-set or slim dudes and for those who wanna be daring can go for 6.5 inches.. and variety is always a plus from me. Oh well, we'll see.. I am very excited to see FreeTom's inflatable one if they plan on releasing it in the near or sometime near future. 

I know someone who bought one from them and had a chance to see it in person...the quality is not good. They are very thick and look like they were cut with a pair of dull scissors, very sloppy looking. The paint job is not that great either...not much detail. The detail is very rough. I guess if you are looking for something in a lower price range they would be ok, but I don't think they are worth the money they are charging. They will not adhere btw...he tried and they are not made to fit the body, you can't get it to stick. They are pretty heavy too.

I saw that reelmagik is coming out with an STP, which should be a 3 in 1...I'd hold out for that one.

I heard similar from a guy who posted a review online. He said it didn't look nearly as good as the photos on the store page, and that the prosthetic itself was rather hard to the touch. Apparently the silicone "skin" was not very soft and felt pretty unrealistic. He also said the rod inside didn't last very long and ended up breaking after a very short time and couldn't be repaired or replaced.

Unfortunately, it seems like there have been quite a few new prosthetic businesses that claim amazing products but turn out to either be scams or terrible products. At least we have a few that are still reputable businesses.  I know one guy who is still trying to get his money back from the ultimate prosthetic company.

Quote from: Codyboy1989 on August 12, 2014, 12:48:37 PM
I know someone who bought one from them and had a chance to see it in person...the quality is not good. They are very thick and look like they were cut with a pair of dull scissors, very sloppy looking. The paint job is not that great either...not much detail. The detail is very rough. I guess if you are looking for something in a lower price range they would be ok, but I don't think they are worth the money they are charging. They will not adhere btw...he tried and they are not made to fit the body, you can't get it to stick. They are pretty heavy too.

I saw that reelmagik is coming out with an STP, which should be a 3 in 1...I'd hold out for that one.

Saw the STP pics. Reelmagik has not failed to impress me time after time. Thanks for the input, by the way.. I'm saving up but now the question is for either RM or RTP.

Thanks for the info Matttrak57, it's good to know their company is at least legit.
It still seems like they put stuff under clearance once a few days, and changing the prices constantly. I might consider to buy one if it is under $100, but no way I will pay the full price to such a new and inexperienced company.

Quote from: Codyboy1989 on August 12, 2014, 12:48:37 PM
I know someone who bought one from them and had a chance to see it in person...the quality is not good. They are very thick and look like they were cut with a pair of dull scissors, very sloppy looking. The paint job is not that great either...not much detail. The detail is very rough. I guess if you are looking for something in a lower price range they would be ok, but I don't think they are worth the money they are charging. They will not adhere btw...he tried and they are not made to fit the body, you can't get it to stick. They are pretty heavy too.

I saw that reelmagik is coming out with an STP, which should be a 3 in 1...I'd hold out for that one.

Yeah I didn't think they would adhere, but some people have gotten peecocks to adhere (not sure how either), so I am not going to rule out the possibility. They just don't have a tab. I think for the price they should be adhering though. It's fairly hefty for what is really an expensive packer. Disappointing re: quality.

BTW, I think the newest RM is not going to be 3 in 1. I asked, even told them how they could do it. LOL.
Oh well.



--Jay

Quote from: SWNID on August 12, 2014, 02:21:49 PM
Thanks for the info Matttrak57, it's good to know their company is at least legit.
It still seems like they put stuff under clearance once a few days, and changing the prices constantly. I might consider to buy one if it is under $100, but no way I will pay the full price to such a new and inexperienced company.

I don't think Matttrak57 was saying they were legit, but just the opposite...it sounds as though their products aren't what they advertise.

Quote from: Codyboy1989 on August 12, 2014, 09:29:18 PM
I don't think Matttrak57 was saying they were legit, but just the opposite...it sounds as though their products aren't what they advertise.

I meant that at least the company is real and people actually receive the products. sorry for the confusion.

It's sad that TUP has lowered the bar so much. But it is the lowest bar possible. "Someone sends me a product that is a semi-useable." There's the definition of a low bar.

--Jay

In case anyone is still interested in one of their products, I e-mailed them and asked about the weight in ounces of the Sleek (4.5 inch). She said that it was "8.7 ounces and about 9 ounces with prosthetic" (I'm assuming that she meant to say the flex rod instead of prosthetic.. so it would be 9 oz with flexrod in.)

I got a nice deal on a Light Brown Sleek (clearance section ftw.. I watched it like a hawk) and I will be in the United States next week so you guys can expect a review of that along with the Eroticreations 5 inch pack n' play. I unfortunately don't have any adhesive on me but I may include that in a future edit of one of the reviews which I'll review them again and see how they held up after a period of time. If anyone has recommendations, please let me know whether that will be via PM or a reply on here.

I just found a video on youtube of one of the owners doing a review. He made the video today. Are we allowed to post video links up? If so let me know and I'll link you guys.

Okay cool.

http://youtu.be/E6xPZ4tsEjE

It's really awesome to see the owner's own review, because he explains why he did what he did. Sounds like he's thinking the right way- as in "These are the problems I had so let's fix them."

Cool, thanks for the video!
I didn't realize how huge it is until i saw him holding it.

Thanks for posting that video

Wow, thanks for finding a video of it!! Excellent.. I'm going to watch it now.

No problem guys. I was just as curious as everyone else here to see a review. I've yet to get an STP/Packer so I wanted to check out a few different brands. I still think I'm going to go with the peecock for my first one. I like the look of the Freetom one but seems like it'd need a bit more adjusting and would need constant checking on lol

Thanks for the PM, Maleth. For some reason I can't message you back but those were all my thoughts exactly :)

I was actually impressed with this aspect. He also says "If the realism is important to you get the RM.. " and that sort of thing. It's professional and indicates what is important to him. I really liked this.

And yes, this is HUGE, but seems to pack well. I still have no idea what's with the rod.

BTW, his idea to include international shipping is NOT well thought out. So he raises the prices so he can include international shipping. Huh?

--Jay

Quote from: CursedFireDean on August 15, 2014, 09:19:26 PM
It's really awesome to see the owner's own review, because he explains why he did what he did. Sounds like he's thinking the right way- as in "These are the problems I had so let's fix them."

This appears to be a more formal video. He explains the rod as "hollow", so you don't take it out. NICE!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iF7KJ-DY_yE


--JY

Quote from: aleon515 on August 16, 2014, 02:39:12 PM
BTW, his idea to include international shipping is NOT well thought out. So he raises the prices so he can include international shipping. Huh?
--Jay

I think he was talking about in another part of the video why he made the prices as they were, but I think one of his main points that he wanted to (in essence) "give back" to the community was to provide at least somewhat affordable prosthetics to transmen everywhere. Though I don't know how good of an idea the free international shipping thing would be from a business perspective since I've never run a business like that myself.

Quote from: aleon515 on August 16, 2014, 03:04:33 PM
This appears to be a more formal video. He explains the rod as "hollow", so you don't take it out. NICE!
--JY

I think the rod was an excellent idea, and I read somewhere that it's removable too.. I also emailed them about it and their customer service told me that the rod can be taken right out if needbe.


On a side note, I will be receiving mine in a week or so which is very exciting. I got a clearance light brown. The "defect" was that there were tiny (3mm) indentations on the head. I really don't have much cash but I still wanted to get one from them and really don't care if there's an indentation (stuff like that doesn't bother me much). You guys can expect a review once I give it a go after I get it! :D

Quote from: aleon515 on August 16, 2014, 02:39:12 PM
I was actually impressed with this aspect. He also says "If the realism is important to you get the RM.. " and that sort of thing. It's professional and indicates what is important to him. I really liked this.

And yes, this is HUGE, but seems to pack well. I still have no idea what's with the rod.

BTW, his idea to include international shipping is NOT well thought out. So he raises the prices so he can include international shipping. Huh?

--Jay

Yes, he does seem quite genuine in what his packer offers and why he made it the way he did.  He made it clear that he was looking for a packer that met his needs and I think that this is (for obvious reasons) a good way to approach your product.

My first question when I saw the FreeTom was how well it would pack.  I do see how the material for the balls being so thin lends itself to the shaft flattening down.  But something that he said in the video caught my ears.  He said, " I don't really pack, anyways". 

I found this interesting.  Does this mean that his main focus for the cock is sex?  Just something quite notable, if the creation of the packer is based on his needs, and his needs don't really include packing.  What this means for the packer I don't know, it just jumped out at me.  It is a "packer" first and foremost...most of your time will be wearing it, not peeing out of it or having sex with it.  If I can't pack with the thing, than the rest of it is moot. 

I'm looking forward to the reviews, but with it hitting 9oz (thanks for checking, Maleth), it maxes out of my weight range for a packer. 

As an aside, does anyone know the weight of the smallest (4.5 ) Peacock?  I never checked that one.

Quote from: Brett on August 17, 2014, 09:58:03 AM
Yes, he does seem quite genuine in what his packer offers and why he made it the way he did.  He made it clear that he was looking for a packer that met his needs and I think that this is (for obvious reasons) a good way to approach your product.

My first question when I saw the FreeTom was how well it would pack.  I do see how the material for the balls being so thin lends itself to the shaft flattening down.  But something that he said in the video caught my ears.  He said, " I don't really pack, anyways". 

I found this interesting.  Does this mean that his main focus for the cock is sex?  Just something quite notable, if the creation of the packer is based on his needs, and his needs don't really include packing.  What this means for the packer I don't know, it just jumped out at me.  It is a "packer" first and foremost...most of your time will be wearing it, not peeing out of it or having sex with it.  If I can't pack with the thing, than the rest of it is moot. 

I'm looking forward to the reviews, but with it hitting 9oz (thanks for checking, Maleth), it maxes out of my weight range for a packer. 

As an aside, does anyone know the weight of the smallest (4.5 ) Peacock?  I never checked that one.

I'm a bit worried about the 9 oz for the weight but I'm hopeful about it.. I'll also be experimenting to adhere the FreeTom ones, though that not might be for a while since I haven't ordered my adhesive yet. Not sure whether Hollister is a good choice or if there are better ones out there. Was considering the Xstra Strength Adhesive from RM but that one is so expensive.. Oh well.

Anyways, I've owned a 4.5 inch Peecock and although I didn't check/measure the weight, I can say that it was quite light actually! The fact that it is hollow except for the small (not well made, IMO) balls, which are filled with silicone but that doesn't make it any much heavier really. I'd say it would be MUCH lighter than a RM basic packer, and only a touch heavier than Mr Limpy. Peecock was very easy to pack with because it's got a very hollow shaft that is made of soft silicone and is very collapsible in the pants. Many reviews even mention that even the bigger ones don't make a boner look in very tight pants. But yeah, if you're concerned about weight with the Peecock, no worries at all because I found it to be a very good weight and not heavy at all. In comparison to my RM (which I couldn't pack with due to the weight and firmness),  it was a LOT better to pack with.

EDIT: Okay, I checked on the website to make sure for you, Brett. Their website says it is 190 Grams, equal to 6.7 ounces.

Quote from: Maleth on August 17, 2014, 10:50:24 AM
I'm a bit worried about the 9 oz for the weight but I'm hopeful about it.. I'll also be experimenting to adhere the FreeTom ones, though that not might be for a while since I haven't ordered my adhesive yet. Not sure whether Hollister is a good choice or if there are better ones out there. Was considering the Xstra Strength Adhesive from RM but that one is so expensive.. Oh well.

Anyways, I've owned a 4.5 inch Peecock and although I didn't check/measure the weight, I can say that it was quite light actually! The fact that it is hollow except for the small (not well made, IMO) balls, which are filled with silicone but that doesn't make it any much heavier really. I'd say it would be MUCH lighter than a RM basic packer, and only a touch heavier than Mr Limpy. Peecock was very easy to pack with because it's got a very hollow shaft that is made of soft silicone and is very collapsible in the pants. Many reviews even mention that even the bigger ones don't make a boner look in very tight pants. But yeah, if you're concerned about weight with the Peecock, no worries at all because I found it to be a very good weight and not heavy at all. In comparison to my RM (which I couldn't pack with due to the weight and firmness),  it was a LOT better to pack with.

EDIT: Okay, I checked on the website to make sure for you, Brett. Their website says it is 190 Grams, equal to 6.7 ounces.

Thanks, Maleth.  It seems that both you and I are on the same quest for the lightest usable/realistic STP!  haha  I am still looking forward to seeing RM's STP weight, as they said it is lighter than the 9.2oz basic packer and prosthetic.  However, the shaft is longer by .5 inches (it is 5 inches).  The ball sack is tapered though, and that is what I had the biggest issue with.

So, I jumped onto stylishflesh to compare the weight to the Peacock because I couldn't remember the numbers.  The Endy is 7.41, so the Peecock wins when it comes to weight.  Something interesting is that when I was ordering the Endy, the Ali (same packer, but cut), was listed as 9.1oz.  I found that curious, but that is what it said.  Anyway, I ordered the Endy due to this (plus the uncut look started to grow on me).  I just looked at the website now and he changed the Ali to 7.76 oz.  I am pretty confident in saying he didn't change the packer, so the 9.1oz weight listed on the website a month ago was just a mistake (is my guess, anyway).

Anyway, I continue to be happy with my Endy, especially since Gaspar sent me a new harness with the leg strap extended by 2 inches, but I would still like a lighter 3-in-1.  However, I can't imagine liking a funnel system better than the spoon that Gaspar uses.  The fit is perfect and I have no problem with backflow.  I like that the rest of the back of the packer is solid, rather than being one big hole like the funnel system packers.  As an aside, this is also my first STP, so the fact that I can use the spoon easily I think is notable.  I do wish the whole packer was silicone, but I know the weight would have to go up then (especially if you wanted to get to the quality of the RM).  At this price point the feel and looks with cyberskin outweighs my desire for not having to dust the packer.

I continue to be curious about the Peacock, though, so who knows if I will purchase one day.  Thanks again for sharing your thoughts, I always appreciate reading your packer reviews/comments.

Brett, it's my pleasure to help a fellow brother out in any ways that I can. It seems that I seem to have a certain strength in reviewing phallic objects, LOL. I can say that Gaspar is very innovative with his harnesses and other products and he's definitely thinking of new ways to improve his products to cater to best functionality, looks, etc. for packers.

PS, Don't be afraid to PM me if you have any specific questions about the Peecock. I am glad to answer them though don't want to get too off topic on this thread.
--

On a main note, I've been following the 'freetomprosthetics' tag on Tumblr pretty closely as of late, since there has been at least one user who bought it and will make a review of it soon (he's testing it out and using it currently). If I see that pop up, I'll try to link it to this thread. The more information from different perspectives, the better. I am looking forward to any reviews out there. :D

I thought it was amusing that he doesn't pack. Obviously his use must mainly be for sex. I don't have a problem with that concept. If I could use one I'd feel differently. But it wouldn't bother me. (I actually thought it looked okay for packing and not too big.) The folks at RM may be trans, but they aren't "out" if that's the case. And very few of the prosthetics makers are "out as trans". (Sadly Cody at TUP is one of them!)

I hate to say this for my international shipping thing, but it just is not even a steady cost, so it's not even predictable. But the idea of giving back, that to me is a good motivation.


--Jay

i ordered a 4.5 4 in 1 a week ago and havent heard anything back from them and was getting a little worried! I am in the UK by the way.

Quote from: aleon515 on August 17, 2014, 01:57:26 PM
I thought it was amusing that he doesn't pack. Obviously his use must mainly be for sex. I don't have a problem with that concept. If I could use one I'd feel differently. But it wouldn't bother me. (I actually thought it looked okay for packing and not too big.) The folks at RM may be trans, but they aren't "out" if that's the case. And very few of the prosthetics makers are "out as trans". (Sadly Cody at TUP is one of them!)

I hate to say this for my international shipping thing, but it just is not even a steady cost, so it's not even predictable. But the idea of giving back, that to me is a good motivation.


--Jay

The guys at RM are actually a mix of gay, trans and straight cis males and females...I talked to them at the conference. The company is owned by two gay cis males (who are a couple), one of the guys is trans, the other two are straight cis males and I believe there is a female as well. It's kind of an interesting mix cause they have a number of angles covered and probably get a good mix of ideas and opinions. They are really great guys and I had a great time talking with them. They seem genuinely interested in helping the trans community...apparently the owner is also a very good friends with the trans guy and he went through the transitioning process with him, so I'm guessing they have a lot of experience with it. Kinda nice to know:)

Hmm.  The 2 in 1 Sleek was $139 a few days ago.  Now it is $149.  In the video, the guy talks about limiting supply rather than raising prices if the demand is too much for the company. 

they seemed to lower prices over all by 50ish dollars o_0...on the 4 in one packers

Maybe I'll get one in the future, see how they come along.

I talked with them and found them nice, fun guys. I imagine it's interesting work environment. I didn't ask them re: their sexual orientation and gender identity. They aren't "out" as such, afaik. But apparently not exactly hiding it either. I seem genuine about what they are doing.

--Jay

Quote from: Codyboy1989 on August 18, 2014, 09:06:48 AM
The guys at RM are actually a mix of gay, trans and straight cis males and females...I talked to them at the conference. The company is owned by two gay cis males (who are a couple), one of the guys is trans, the other two are straight cis males and I believe there is a female as well. It's kind of an interesting mix cause they have a number of angles covered and probably get a good mix of ideas and opinions. They are really great guys and I had a great time talking with them. They seem genuinely interested in helping the trans community...apparently the owner is also a very good friends with the trans guy and he went through the transitioning process with him, so I'm guessing they have a lot of experience with it. Kinda nice to know:)

Re: Price drops of FreeTom Prosthetics and such..

I think they're just trying to find a good pricerange for their company with what they offer to the people... In my opinion the initial prices (what were they? like 200-300 at most ?) were a bit high but now that they have lowered prices it seems a bit more competitive especially with Peecock since that's around the same pricerange. Interesting.


PS, that guy on Tumblr that I mentioned a few posts ago finally made an initial review. Here is the link (NSFW due to image): http://supermansadork.tumblr.com/post/95055808456/so-far-loving-my-freetomprosthetic-looks-realer

He seems pleased by the sounds of his review and also answers a few questions asked by other people regarding harnesses and stuff like that in another part of his blog.

Thanks for the review.  Please come back after you pee!

Quote from: toysfortransmen on August 18, 2014, 11:51:30 AM
Did you order it on clearance or normal?
The clearance ones they ship out a couple days after you purchase it. The normal ones must be hand made and painted (if you bought the painted). It says on their website it could take up to 25 days for you to receive your order. They have it in a few different places on their website.

Yeah i ordered the one within 25 days. I just thought i may get shipping updates but nothing so far!

I know a guy who makes prosthetics. I believe most prosthetics are all poured individually and may be several layers. Each layer must be dried before the next one is poured. This may take days, and I imagine he has a day job. They usually don't have a bunch of ready made prosthetics to send out. I am guessing the "clearance items" are already poured and you can them faster. I think these are generally mistakes (small or larger). He wouldn't send a shipping update if he hasn't shipped or is ready to ship. It's a sign of a seriously bad company to send a shipping update on an incomplete item.

@toys... not going to get this item, but just gave you a reputation point for the good review. Thanks for doing this for the community.

--Jay

Quote from: Brett on August 19, 2014, 06:00:58 PM
Thanks for the review.  Please come back after you pee!

Seriously though, toysfortransmen, please review the peeing function.  You must have peed by now! lol Have you packed with it for long periods yet, or is this just your initial impression after placing it into your pants?  People often do reviews right after getting the product, rather than trying it out for a bit, first.

Thanks.

It's hard to figure out if a certain thing has a design flaw or if it's just not a good fit for your body. I think that the stimulation bit is too high to be effective. While using it, the shaft would be sitting really low (if I'm understanding the design).

I was going to order one today, but one of my professor just sent an email about a new textbook we need to buy for the class...So I have to work a few more shifts before I have the many for it.
I want the 6.5" since the play function is important for me, but I little bit concerned that the girth is too big. Thanks for the review toysfortransmen!

Quote from: toysfortransmen on August 20, 2014, 08:31:56 PM
Ive only peed once with it. And my assumption was correct, that it still has backflow issues. it doesnt completely press against me cause its so big. Im gonna keep playing with it and see if it gets any better. But as of right now its still an issue.
Havent tried it for penetration yet but it feels pretty awesome for oral.

Also i do my reviews in multiparts. An initial, and then after ive had it a little while so that i can cover all aspects of the product.

Great.  Thanks for the update.  :)

Sorry to bother, but I found the video by the Jason Robert Ballard guy that reviewed it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7huNeWUo9Q

Also, they made a video about the rods and it's on the owner's youtube page. Channel is called FTMLifestyle.

P.S. Toysfortransmen thank you for the great review!

 They raised the prices a bit again. Now they are doing the limited a supply each month; just checked the 5.5in and they are sold out but I guess they restock the 1st of every month.

Quote from: toysfortransmen on August 22, 2014, 12:17:03 PM
Mine doesnt look ANYTHING like that on the inside. And yes i bought a clearance one but the only thing supossedly wrong with it was the paint. But.... My inside is super messy and the pleasure slide is like 2 added on ridges. Its Not nearly a spretty as the one in the viseo

That's odd. I clearly remember seeing one like that on clearance, I even saw the pictures of it and it indeed did look like that, so yeah it wasn't too pretty on the inside... Maybe it was at a much more reduced price or something to make up for the pleasure slide and the paint? No idea, I can't tell because I don't know how much you paid for it nor am I gonna ask. But one thing is for certain is that the regular priced ones are always going to look (and maybe even feel) better than the clearance ones. There's a reason it was priced 40-100 dollars less than original price and that is because it's not as perfect as they guarantee the regular ones to be. But yeah, I understand that the messy inside can be a bit irritating since it is gonna be sitting up against your body for as long as you have to pack with it for. Anyways, I'm getting a clearance too but without a pleasure slide (Pre-T so it wouldnt matter anyways) so mine might be messy on the inside too but on the bright side the outside can be at least a little pretty. The pleasure rod.. you could contact the company about that, maybe they could send you another if it's really not how they advertised it to be?

Also, I re-read your review and you said the funnel was way too big for you. I'm kind of a small guy too so that raised a few small concerns for me. How tall are you if you don't mind me asking? I got the sleek 4.5 but a funnel's still a funnel..

I wonder why they keep changing up the prices.  It is kind of odd how often it happens (according to posts).

Yeah it's a bit odd. I'm thinking he is not sure what to charge, which is understandable, but makes him seem kind of unprofessional. He could offer a sale initially or something, but going back and forth is a bit odd.

--Jay

Quote from: Brett on August 22, 2014, 10:53:59 PM
I wonder why they keep changing up the prices.  It is kind of odd how often it happens (according to posts).

I was in touch with them and apparently they are revamping their detail paint thing, and then they will have a big sale. I'm waiting until then.

FreeToM says they're having a back to school sale, through Friday.  25% off entire purchase.  Enter code at checkout: O3FYQ8VUOCWU

Quote from: zero.cool.crash.override on September 03, 2014, 10:07:43 PM
FreeToM says they're having a back to school sale, through Friday.  25% off entire purchase.  Enter code at checkout: O3FYQ8VUOCWU

Maybe they have read the recent reviews of their products here and are not looking forward to more reviews coming in (the concerns are concrete and objective), so they are trying to move their stock quickly.  Yes, I am completely serious.  It would be a smart business decision.

I agree with your assessment Brett (surprise surprise). I think an unfinished inside is a flaw that would reduce comfort. I think they need to work on this. It's inside is what touches your parts. THat would give me a bit of pause tbh, if I wanted it touching me.

--Jay

I got mine but havent opened it yet so will write back to you later. I went for the one without any paint detail

First impressions, absolutely impossible to pack with, with or without the rod. Disappointing!

Quote from: j612 on September 10, 2014, 07:28:58 AM
First impressions, absolutely impossible to pack with, with or without the rod. Disappointing!

Sorry to hear that.  It stinks when you put out money for something, get all excited, and then it is not what you expect. 

I wish i had gone for the Peecock Gen 2 but i went with this cos it seemed more realistic looking, which is true for the shaft, but thats about it. Doesnt make up for functionality unfortunately!
Peeing with it is Ok, even though i have had one accident, i dont feel confident with, if you really need to go, the ball part fills up so much it overflows (especially if you keep the rod in) and emptying is is a pain and i dont know how you would "empty your balls" in a public toilet convincingly as men dont do this. Packing is by far the worst aspect, a harness would greatly improve this but they make me dysphoric so i was hoping this would sit comfortably in my tight is boxers against my anatomy but no, the back of this thing is HUGE. And flimsy too. The shaft is essentially the heaviest part of it so after a few minutes in your pants, it slips down to where the head is touching your thigh. Its doesnt folld over naturaly at all, even without the rod, it looks like a semi boner so you cant pack it to the side or down as it just doesnt stay.  I havent tried it for Play but i can imagine that would be a positive in the bigger sizes, although how on earth youd pack with the 5.5 or 6.5 when the 4.5 is this  unpractical, i dont know. So all in all, iif it dodnt have so much material around the funnel which stops it sitting close to your body, AND the balls were better, it might have a chance but for now, i feel it might sit in my drawer gathering dust.

Quote from: j612 on September 11, 2014, 06:59:17 AM
I wish i had gone for the Peecock Gen 2 but i went with this cos it seemed more realistic looking, which is true for the shaft, but thats about it. Doesnt make up for functionality unfortunately!
Peeing with it is Ok, even though i have had one accident, i dont feel confident with, if you really need to go, the ball part fills up so much it overflows (especially if you keep the rod in) and emptying is is a pain and i dont know how you would "empty your balls" in a public toilet convincingly as men dont do this. Packing is by far the worst aspect, a harness would greatly improve this but they make me dysphoric so i was hoping this would sit comfortably in my tight is boxers against my anatomy but no, the back of this thing is HUGE. And flimsy too. The shaft is essentially the heaviest part of it so after a few minutes in your pants, it slips down to where the head is touching your thigh. Its doesnt folld over naturaly at all, even without the rod, it looks like a semi boner so you cant pack it to the side or down as it just doesnt stay.  I havent tried it for Play but i can imagine that would be a positive in the bigger sizes, although how on earth youd pack with the 5.5 or 6.5 when the 4.5 is this  unpractical, i dont know. So all in all, iif it dodnt have so much material around the funnel which stops it sitting close to your body, AND the balls were better, it might have a chance but for now, i feel it might sit in my drawer gathering dust.

Thanks for the review J612. I'm sorry you weren't satisfied with your prosthetic (especially due to the pricetag). Though if you still ever decide to pack with it again I recommend wearing tight boxer briefs or briefs and tucking it down IF needed. I also wouldn't want to tell anyone to do this but I can say that I personally trimmed the top of the blank funnel-ish thing at the very top and trimmed off some extra spaced but still left an inch or two intact. It's worked wonders for me personally but I suggest being very careful with it if you do decide that. Cheers.

Its funny you say that actually cos i trimmed it today at the top! I dont know whether its cos i've just got it but it wont pack totally flat because its so..springy? It would be ok if it stayed in placed, i'm trying to get used to it. I'm happy to post pictures if anyone wants me too.

Quote from: j612 on September 11, 2014, 03:22:13 PM
Its funny you say that actually cos i trimmed it today at the top! I dont know whether its cos i've just got it but it wont pack totally flat because its so..springy? It would be ok if it stayed in placed, i'm trying to get used to it. I'm happy to post pictures if anyone wants me too.

I think springy is a good word to describe it. It seems as if the natural position for it is erect and therefore it likes to pop up like your regular ol' cisboner. I think it'd be cool if you could post the pictures. I wonder how much you trimmed off.

You cant upload pics straight from a phone here can you? Its been a while since i used a forum, sorry!

Quote from: j612 on September 12, 2014, 12:43:12 PM
You cant upload pics straight from a phone here can you? Its been a while since i used a forum, sorry!

No you upload to a site like shutterbug, imgur, etc. Then you provide the link. THe forum doesn't allow for direct upload (except for your avatar, which it allows after a certain number of posts.)

--Jay

(https://www.susans.org/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FJQKjfwz.jpg&hash=c90f0b549ca8a58581108770e7828f95ab35007a)
(https://www.susans.org/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FG9PxFeS.jpg&hash=80258c5e7f42e0e5387767bf4a56856a10c6971e)
(https://www.susans.org/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F8oiKbMt.jpg&hash=4b231ae50f2dc5dd8b084c175d1d9364384489b8)

these are all taken without the rod and as you can see its definitely got a lot of rigidity to it, the rod doesnt even make too much different to be honest to look at like this. Also, the "pleasure slide" i cant imagine lining up with anyones bits to provide any use, i think thats definitely a gimmick! these pictures were taken after i cut about half an inch off around the top as well. hope this is useful. i do have a tumblr where i mentioned ive bought one but i didnt fancy putting too much detail on there where people in real life might see, so if anyone wants me message me about it, i can answer privately on there at jacobsladder1.tumblr.com

I can't imagine having that huge thing in my pants to begin with, and then to try to figure out how to wrangle the shaft down to pack.... does not look fun.  It is also strange that the "pleasure slide" isn't even centered.  Shouldn't it be?

I'm thinking of this as something similar to the gen 1 peecock. Remember when those came out? People had problems and those problems were addressed with the peecock 2. I think this multi use STP has potential, and the guy who makes it knows how our bodies work (in general). I'm going to be patient and wait for improvements. I think in a year or so the production will be better and the product will function better.

People are made more or less symmetrically, so it seems to be a flaw. Perhaps a little lack of care. Yeah looks huge. Nice looking but seems very large.

--Jay

Quote from: Brett on September 12, 2014, 08:20:57 PM
I can't imagine having that huge thing in my pants to begin with, and then to try to figure out how to wrangle the shaft down to pack.... does not look fun.  It is also strange that the "pleasure slide" isn't even centered.  Shouldn't it be?

Yep just too large and thats the smallest size! Also even if it was packable, that amount of silicone or whatever its made off, so close to your stuff all day long, gets veeeeerry uncomfortable and hot haha

It does appear to have potential. Perhaps just not quite ready for prime time.

--Jay

Quote from: Nygeel on September 12, 2014, 10:04:32 PM
I'm thinking of this as something similar to the gen 1 peecock. Remember when those came out? People had problems and those problems were addressed with the peecock 2. I think this multi use STP has potential, and the guy who makes it knows how our bodies work (in general). I'm going to be patient and wait for improvements. I think in a year or so the production will be better and the product will function better.

I forgot to show that this is with the rod as far down and then as far up as it will go. This is probably the most misleading part because i thought it would bend right down so it was flatter to the balls to pack but as you can see, its quite a way off
(https://www.susans.org/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FI0VhoeY.jpg&hash=07b24a83be7cc2baff0b02832d378812a9c08838)
(https://www.susans.org/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fte5stUn.jpg&hash=619431c88747a464c6594ec046c9c7a4853746db)

Quote from: j612 on September 13, 2014, 07:47:12 PM
I forgot to show that this is with the rod as far down and then as far up as it will go. This is probably the most misleading part because i thought it would bend right down so it was flatter to the balls to pack but as you can see, its quite a way off
(https://www.susans.org/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FI0VhoeY.jpg&hash=07b24a83be7cc2baff0b02832d378812a9c08838)
(https://www.susans.org/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fte5stUn.jpg&hash=619431c88747a464c6594ec046c9c7a4853746db)

Holy crap, you are saying that top picture is as flat as it goes to pack?  That's insane.  It's straight out.

Maleth, how the heck can you see this as a viable "daily packer"?  Does yours flatten more than this?

j612, thanks so much for that photo.

What if you put a wire in it?

Take a coat hanger, cut off a piece that's twice the length of the tubing, bend it in half, put rubber stoppers on the ends of the wire, put it inside the packer and bend so it points down better. I think the main issue is that you can't bend it where the shaft and balls join. a bobby pin might fix that.

Quote from: Nygeel on September 13, 2014, 10:28:25 PM
What if you put a wire in it?

Take a coat hanger, cut off a piece that's twice the length of the tubing, bend it in half, put rubber stoppers on the ends of the wire, put it inside the packer and bend so it points down better. I think the main issue is that you can't bend it where the shaft and balls join. a bobby pin might fix that.

Right.  It looks to me like it is the tubing used.  It is stiff until halfway through the shaft.  Then you can click it up or down.  This product cost way too much for what these guys got from it.

Quote from: Brett on September 13, 2014, 11:48:55 PM
Right.  It looks to me like it is the tubing used.  It is stiff until halfway through the shaft.  Then you can click it up or down.  This product cost way too much for what these guys got from it.

I'm not sure about that. It is a product with good detail work, the guy who makes them isn't doing a mass production set up which would cut costs significantly. There are a lot of fine details that need to be worked out in terms of functionality. The tubing used has been used in several other STPs from trans guys (forgot which ones exactly).

You can physically push it down without the rod but its very forced and it doesnt sit naturally cos its then
so top heavy (i'll post pictures of this later)  and the shaft ends up looking so long in your pants and like you have no balls. They need to make one that instead of being bent up and down, needs to be able to go backwards in on itself like a flaccid penis does basically.

You need sometjing ridged to connect the inside of the shaft with the balls.

Ok so here are quite a few pictures showing why i cant pack with it;
Firstly, its disproportionate when you flatten it to pack, like this;
(https://www.susans.org/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FMoJiMci.jpg&hash=e442cb37e8839bf3603552315fe84e4006026244)
(https://www.susans.org/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F4kr9DMo.jpg&hash=3695d23a437dbb58a46a778da9a93e5d6636edac)

So the bulge you get is odd like this, with zero balls cos theyve now turned in on themselves (and without a harness) it slips further and further down because youre all shaft haha and you eventually end up with the tip going towards your arse and the top of the packer creating a ridge as its getting turned upside down like this, starting from when i place it in my pants to 5 minutes later;

(https://www.susans.org/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fl4KPL6r.jpg&hash=4d01565c20a39366cd9bfbce9490c9e40f9c96c6)
(https://www.susans.org/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FfY6OccM.jpg&hash=e965a59a0bcbe28906695ac4fcaea0e86f49b352)
(https://www.susans.org/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FKhoDDeN.jpg&hash=94b56b4cdf21748b384331e1ddcebbe4bc2897f8)
(https://www.susans.org/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F0xBFfy4.jpg&hash=05a379a6038f7a9019ae5cf032c540ed98d9e9bd)
(https://www.susans.org/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F1DO7JUT.jpg&hash=e14c422f07761e9af76f44e0216c0a59fbf13093)

Sorry that you are unhappy with your purchase J612.
Seems like they designed the scrotum to be empty on purpose so that you can empty it out when you pee, but I don't like the design either. I don't think it would work out well this way and it compromises the general shape and feel too much. Thanks for sharing!!!

No problem, ive never put pictures of myself in my pants on the internet before but anything for science haha

I think if the silicone funnel edges were more of a taper that would help make it sit better and cut down on size/weight.

Since this is the longest and most detailed thread I think I'll add my posts to this until I get mine in the mail.


1) I was originally hoping that someone would post a review of just the 2 in 1. Surely someone has bought that. That would give more insight and help compare for folks that really just want to pack and pee and will use something else for play.  Especially since the silicone is totally different. Surely that has some impact on the compressability while in shorts and heck could be more helpful when adjusting for peeing.

Perhaps the owners should do more detailed videos.

2) I hope any future reviewers can give more information on their body type, and strategy used for peeing and whether or not they purchased this for primarily using it at the urinal vs wanting to be able to stand in the toilet stall (which is what I want. I have less interest in the urinal). I would always hate to put up a rating or outright say something isn't good when this is such a personal item. What works for my large body will not likely work for someone significantly smaller, and then how everyone's junk is situated is also important and the size of that (like the flesh around the penis) is important in using an STP. I myself, have quite a bit of flesh and fat down there where someone else may virtually have nothing significant other than their penis. We would use the device differently.

3) Since I haven't found reviews of the 2 in 1 and most of the 4 in 1 reviews are from folks that seem much smaller bodied than myself (as evidenced by folks saying the cup of the pee portion is too big or saying that they are a smaller bodied guy), I figure that the cup may actually work for me.
I'm 5'9" and 250# so, a firm silicone penis doesn't usually look like a boner on me and the STPs with the small spoons just do not work.
I've always wanted to try something with a larger receptacle and would like to see how much any body issue stuff would be reduced if I really had 1 prosthetic that could be used all of the time (but wasn't as exp as RM!!!).

So, I've been scouring their clearance section and today bought the 4 in 1 Rogue 5.5 (I'm chocolate colored and so this wait was much longer than I was happy with!!!). It was $139 today and was made for taking pictures so should have 0 issues.

While, I am not happy that their price keeps changing...I'm glad I'm not spending tooooo much for it. Like my other STP was like 50-60$, is not as large and I wouldn't use it for sex at all. So, 139$ for something that has more functionality if my body type works for it, is okay. But I would not buy it at the $189 price point or the $200 for the 6.5 (which is the size I really wanted but a sale is a sale!).

Once I get it I will give my review. I do have another 3 in one  and 2 simple packers to compare things to.

Looking forward to your review, willows!

As am I also looking forward to your review, Willows.

Offtopic but this is a bit unofficial but sorry if I haven't been able to answer PMs or reply on threads guys, RL has been keeping me busy 24/7 for a while now.

It's too bad, but I don't think the guy who creates this is a member here. I think it's a very good way to get feedback.I agree that I don't think the guy is making a killing on them, but obviously they seem less than wearable.
It's too bad as there is a lot of nice work on them which makes them fairly realistic.

--Jay

*Looking forward for your review willows.

I'm hunting for a better functional all in one for myself. I have been peeking at Freetom for a bit here, I like what I see. The reviews that i've seen are pretty mixed, but the video one by the guy from self-made kind of sold me on it since I actually got to see the thing function. I don't trust words anymore since I'm an unusual candidate due to my size.

I'm highly curious about the pump style A1 model though since tyron's and how I envision a perfect prosthetic. The only other STP I'm curious on is the reel magik, and I feel very confident in their product but the price is over that of what i'm willing to spend. My personal cap on a prosthetic at this time being 250, since I don't want to go all out until I've been on T and post op for a few years. So these guys look like a good option. I own a second gen peecock and it's just... it's not too bad for sex, but id have to position myself a certain way so the rod didnt hurt, Im also wicked sensitive though. Then I found the funnel to be too small/flimsy so I stopped using it as a stp and got a straight STP with medicine spoon, and it works but I'm sick of having to fiddle so I avoid urinals due to it. So this guy looks like it solves those issues, and due to the fact it's within my price range, after my surgeries I'll probably give it a try.

Sorry for the babble, but if in the end of december/janurary I order one I'll try to remember to do a review of it versus my peecock and a traditional medicine spoon stp. I'd like to hear more on it in the mean time though, but so far it's at the top of my list.

Quote from: StirfriedKraut on November 30, 2014, 02:05:46 AM
*Looking forward for your review willows.

I'm hunting for a better functional all in one for myself. I have been peeking at Freetom for a bit here, I like what I see. The reviews that i've seen are pretty mixed, but the video one by the guy from self-made kind of sold me on it since I actually got to see the thing function. I don't trust words anymore since I'm an unusual candidate due to my size.

I'm highly curious about the pump style A1 model though since tyron's and how I envision a perfect prosthetic. The only other STP I'm curious on is the reel magik, and I feel very confident in their product but the price is over that of what i'm willing to spend. My personal cap on a prosthetic at this time being 250, since I don't want to go all out until I've been on T and post op for a few years. So these guys look like a good option. I own a second gen peecock and it's just... it's not too bad for sex, but id have to position myself a certain way so the rod didnt hurt, Im also wicked sensitive though. Then I found the funnel to be too small/flimsy so I stopped using it as a stp and got a straight STP with medicine spoon, and it works but I'm sick of having to fiddle so I avoid urinals due to it. So this guy looks like it solves those issues, and due to the fact it's within my price range, after my surgeries I'll probably give it a try.

Sorry for the babble, but if in the end of december/janurary I order one I'll try to remember to do a review of it versus my peecock and a traditional medicine spoon stp. I'd like to hear more on it in the mean time though, but so far it's at the top of my list.

StirfriedKraut,

Did you read the whole thread and look at all the pictures?  I personally don't understand what makes you think this is a good choice?  ???

I mean no disrespect to your thinking, but just reading js12's posts along with the pictures shows how it really can't be used for packing or playing (especially if the rod is in it for packing, and the angle of the rod when playing does not fit the curve of the vaginal canal correct at all, until you are happy with only inserting a couple of inches), shows it's poor form.  When it comes to peeing, there are a lot out there now that can pee well enough.

I am just wondering what makes this an attractive 3-in-1 for you?

I received mine yesterday, a traditional 4-1, and wore it for a good thirteen hours with little issue, including sleep, so I thought I'd leave a review here.

It was a bit fiddly to get it to sit right, but after adjusting abit, it sits just fine. I think it might be a body-shape/anatomy issue for some people?
It is rather larger than my previous packers, so I tried several different positions, and found that 'dressing to the side' worked best for me. I was already doing that with my Mr Limpy, so not much of a change. It is heavier, so I'm probably going to sew up a harness to make it feel a bit more secure.

I used the pee function several times without issue. The hollow balls seem like a plus to me and not really awkward. I simply held the stp in place between my thumb and first finger, then used the last three finders to discreetly 'tip' the balls when I was done, which empties them nicely.

I did end up taking out the flex-rod as it makes noise and I didn't feel that good about the possibility of urine getting between the rod and silicone.

I was sceptical over the whole 'pleasure slide' thing, and I am woe-fully single, so I can't review use with a partner. I did attempt a little solo-use of the pleasure slide, and while I found it living up to its name, it is probably better for people with T-growth.

It feels good and solid in hand, and not very sticky. Rubbery, but I found that a light dusting with corn meal (sp?) made it feel much better.

Quote from: AlexW on December 16, 2014, 09:51:46 AM
I received mine yesterday, a traditional 4-1, and wore it for a good thirteen hours with little issue, including sleep, so I thought I'd leave a review here.

It was a bit fiddly to get it to sit right, but after adjusting abit, it sits just fine. I think it might be a body-shape/anatomy issue for some people?
It is rather larger than my previous packers, so I tried several different positions, and found that 'dressing to the side' worked best for me. I was already doing that with my Mr Limpy, so not much of a change. It is heavier, so I'm probably going to sew up a harness to make it feel a bit more secure.

I used the pee function several times without issue. The hollow balls seem like a plus to me and not really awkward. I simply held the stp in place between my thumb and first finger, then used the last three finders to discreetly 'tip' the balls when I was done, which empties them nicely.

I did end up taking out the flex-rod as it makes noise and I didn't feel that good about the possibility of urine getting between the rod and silicone.

I was sceptical over the whole 'pleasure slide' thing, and I am woe-fully single, so I can't review use with a partner. I did attempt a little solo-use of the pleasure slide, and while I found it living up to its name, it is probably better for people with T-growth.

It feels good and solid in hand, and not very sticky. Rubbery, but I found that a light dusting with corn meal (sp?) made it feel much better.

Hey, thanks so much for the review! I was wondering about shipping and customer service? Did they send you a shipping notification? Tracking? Also, about how long did it take to arrive (from order to date of receipt?) Thanks again! And I'm really glad that it seems that it's working for you! :)

I actually bought mine from someone who had ordered the wrong colour, so I never dealt directly with the company at all. I bought it from someone in Canada, and I'm in Denmark, but it only took 3 business days to get to me.  (I ordered it Thursday, it arrived Tuesday afternoon.)

Sorry I can't be more helpful!

I wasn't happy with it overall. I think the best use is for play, but STP and packing wise it just didn't work for me. But like everyone says, we all have different anatomies so it may work well for some guys. I wrote my review over at http://ftm.livejournal.com/7368331.html (http://ftm.livejournal.com/7368331.html).

AlexW, thanks for much for the review.  Which specific model did you get?

To clarify, you said you wore it for 13 hours including sleep.  So how many hours were you actually awake when you were wearing it?

Also, since there are so many people who are dissatisfied with it, it would be great if you could come back and review again after you have more time with the product.  First impressions tend to be much more positive than later impressions I have found when it comes to packer/STP reviews. 

Thanks!

Brett: As I stated in my review, I have the Traditional 4 in 1. I wore it roughly 7 hours awake.

Once I've had it for a while, I'll post an updated review.

Quote from: AlexW on December 18, 2014, 08:48:39 AM
Brett: As I stated in my review, I have the Traditional 4 in 1. I wore it roughly 7 hours awake.

Once I've had it for a while, I'll post an updated review.

Ah, sorry, I thought you just said 4 in 1.  With the sizing being so different, I wanted to make sure I knew which one you were talking about.  I hope it continues to work for you.  8) Thanks.

CAN U USE THE GEN 3 PLEASURE KIT OF THE PEECOCK WITH THE ROD OF THE GEN 2 PEECOCK?

Sent from my LG-H631 using Tapatalk

ARE THEY COMPATIBLE?

Sent from my LG-H631 using Tapatalk

Hi!  I have the 4 in 1 "Traditional."  It took MONTHS to receive, because they're all handmade.  It's actually very realistic, but not ideal to pack with since it's big enough to be used to play.  I used to try using the STP part, but eventually gave up because the balls would just fill with pee since they're hollow.  That being said, I'm also really bad at using STPs.  In terms of play, it's VERY thick.  You'd need Magnums or something, because regular condoms don't even come close to fitting. 

It's also just a strange material in the sense that it "pulls" away from your body during play.   I have rodeoh packing/play boxer briefs with an O-ring, which I think you can also get on their site.  Whenever I used it during sex, I would have to literally hold on to the base while I was thrusting, just so it would actually move.  Otherwise, my body wouldn't move at the packer wouldn't move with it, hah.  It's realistic and nice and it feels good to have in your pants if you need a confidence boost, but it's just a lot of money and hard to use. 

I recently invested in a realdoe and it's AMAZING.  Like really amazing.  Of course, it's also not an STP or packer, and it's really not super realistic.  But in terms of minimizing my dysphoria during actual sex, the realdoe is the best result I've had.  Plus, it shipped in a few days.  https://www.feeldoe.com/feeldoe_toys.html