Community Conversation => Female to male transsexual talk (FTM) => Transsexual talk => FTM Gear => Topic started by: Carbonated on October 16, 2015, 05:00:19 PM Return to Full Version
Title: Freetom "My Favourite" STP Review
Post by: Carbonated on October 16, 2015, 05:00:19 PM
Post by: Carbonated on October 16, 2015, 05:00:19 PM
This is my review of a clearance FreeTom 3.5" "My Favourite" in Tan and soft silicone. Paid 44$ without shipping. I've included a link to a couple of pictures. In the last two pics I put the packer next to a RM basic, Pierre, and Pierre small if anyone is interested in comparing the size. And excuse my English, it's not my native language.
Customer service:
Long story short, my post office screwed up and sent the my package back to the U.S. (I live in Europe). Even tough Freetom had nothing to do with this they offered to pay for the return and the shipping back to me again which saved me 70$. I didn't expect them to do that so I'm very happy with the customer service! They replied fast and my experience with this company was only positive.
Look:
I got it on a clearance sale and the description stated the receptacle was cut to short and that the surface had some imperfections. This was no problem since I didn't really need the stp-part, I just wanted to use it as a packer. The only surface imperfection I could find was a untextured spot on the balls, but that doesn't really bother me. The majority of the packer however, is nicely detailed and way better looking than any other packer I own.
It has a nice girth and the lenght is average (3.5").
The color looks like the picture on the website, so no surprises there.
Feel:
The silicone is soft, not as soft as I'd like it to be, but no silicone packer I have bought is. All the packers in the album have about the same softness to them when feeling the thick parts. But because this one is mostly hollow, it feels much squishier over-all and not as hard as the others when felt through pants.
Packing:
Packs great. Far better than any other packer I've tried. I cut the part that is needed for stp-ing off, and after that it's extremely comfortable and stays where I want it. I use a homemade harness, the one called "Worlds simplest packy harness" and it works great. If you use tight underwear, I think you could do without a harness.
The bulge looks normal to me, but might be a bit big for smaller guys. It is quite wide though, wich could be a problem depending on how your built. I like that it's wide, i find other packers awkward the way they just stick out from your body. This one kinda blends in to the body in a more natural way and when feeling it over my underwear i have a hard time telling where the packer ends and I begin which is an extreme dysporia reliever to me.
Peeing:
Before cutting the receptacle off, I tried to pee with it, just for the sake of this review. It worked fine at home, but due to the wideness I had to bend my knees and spread my legs ridiculously wide, which left me in a very awkward position that just isn't urinal-appropriate.
Pros:
-Very nicely detailed
-Realistic size
-Comfortable
-Realistic look in underwear
-Unique shape compared to other packers
Cons:
-Difficult to pee with whilst looking normal
It was definitely worth the money! I would recommend it as a packer, the way it blends in with my own body is just plain awesome. But if you're looking for an easy-use stp, look elsewhere.
Feel free to ask me if you have any questions!
http://imgur.com/a/hO5nn (http://imgur.com/a/hO5nn)
Customer service:
Long story short, my post office screwed up and sent the my package back to the U.S. (I live in Europe). Even tough Freetom had nothing to do with this they offered to pay for the return and the shipping back to me again which saved me 70$. I didn't expect them to do that so I'm very happy with the customer service! They replied fast and my experience with this company was only positive.
Look:
I got it on a clearance sale and the description stated the receptacle was cut to short and that the surface had some imperfections. This was no problem since I didn't really need the stp-part, I just wanted to use it as a packer. The only surface imperfection I could find was a untextured spot on the balls, but that doesn't really bother me. The majority of the packer however, is nicely detailed and way better looking than any other packer I own.
It has a nice girth and the lenght is average (3.5").
The color looks like the picture on the website, so no surprises there.
Feel:
The silicone is soft, not as soft as I'd like it to be, but no silicone packer I have bought is. All the packers in the album have about the same softness to them when feeling the thick parts. But because this one is mostly hollow, it feels much squishier over-all and not as hard as the others when felt through pants.
Packing:
Packs great. Far better than any other packer I've tried. I cut the part that is needed for stp-ing off, and after that it's extremely comfortable and stays where I want it. I use a homemade harness, the one called "Worlds simplest packy harness" and it works great. If you use tight underwear, I think you could do without a harness.
The bulge looks normal to me, but might be a bit big for smaller guys. It is quite wide though, wich could be a problem depending on how your built. I like that it's wide, i find other packers awkward the way they just stick out from your body. This one kinda blends in to the body in a more natural way and when feeling it over my underwear i have a hard time telling where the packer ends and I begin which is an extreme dysporia reliever to me.
Peeing:
Before cutting the receptacle off, I tried to pee with it, just for the sake of this review. It worked fine at home, but due to the wideness I had to bend my knees and spread my legs ridiculously wide, which left me in a very awkward position that just isn't urinal-appropriate.
Pros:
-Very nicely detailed
-Realistic size
-Comfortable
-Realistic look in underwear
-Unique shape compared to other packers
Cons:
-Difficult to pee with whilst looking normal
It was definitely worth the money! I would recommend it as a packer, the way it blends in with my own body is just plain awesome. But if you're looking for an easy-use stp, look elsewhere.
Feel free to ask me if you have any questions!
http://imgur.com/a/hO5nn (http://imgur.com/a/hO5nn)
Title: Re: Freetom "My Favourite" STP Review
Post by: Marx on October 16, 2015, 10:21:55 PM
Post by: Marx on October 16, 2015, 10:21:55 PM
This just makes me want a my favorite even more, great review!
This is kinda off topic, but would you mind telling me what color your Pierre is on the far right? I've been looking for someone to sell one second hand for awhile, but am about to give up and just buy one. Did you like the small or regular sized one more?
This is kinda off topic, but would you mind telling me what color your Pierre is on the far right? I've been looking for someone to sell one second hand for awhile, but am about to give up and just buy one. Did you like the small or regular sized one more?
Title: Re: Freetom "My Favourite" STP Review
Post by: Carbonated on October 17, 2015, 03:30:48 AM
Post by: Carbonated on October 17, 2015, 03:30:48 AM
They're actually Hazelnut colored both of them. The smaller one is a bit darker, also it's in the shadow in the picture so it looks even darker than it is. The one to the right however, looks just like it does irl. I guess their products have slight color variations.
I definitely like the bigger one better. The shaft is a bit to long, but it doesn't look obscene through pants or anything. I considered cutting an inch or two of the shaft to make it more comfortable to pack with. The small is more average length-wise, but it has about the same girth as my thumb, and the balls are extremely small, so it's basically invisible. Hard to pack with to, since it is so small and light it moves around easily. But if you're a smaller guy or want to very discreet it might be good.
I definitely like the bigger one better. The shaft is a bit to long, but it doesn't look obscene through pants or anything. I considered cutting an inch or two of the shaft to make it more comfortable to pack with. The small is more average length-wise, but it has about the same girth as my thumb, and the balls are extremely small, so it's basically invisible. Hard to pack with to, since it is so small and light it moves around easily. But if you're a smaller guy or want to very discreet it might be good.
Title: Re: Freetom "My Favourite" STP Review
Post by: makipu on October 26, 2015, 08:37:09 PM
Post by: makipu on October 26, 2015, 08:37:09 PM
Hi Carbonated, when you say tight underwear, would boxer briefs do and not necessarily briefs? I am looking to not wear a harness.
Title: Re: Freetom "My Favourite" STP Review
Post by: Carbonated on October 27, 2015, 12:44:32 PM
Post by: Carbonated on October 27, 2015, 12:44:32 PM
Quote from: makipu on October 26, 2015, 08:37:09 PMI wear baggy boxer briefs, a size or two up from my actual size, and I find that it rides up and creates a very large bulge. But I tried it with a pair that has more of a snug fit today, and it looked fine and felt comfortable. So i guess it could ride up depending on how big your boxer briefs are, but because of how wide it is it won't flip over or move around in your pants.
Hi Carbonated, when you say tight underwear, would boxer briefs do and not necessarily briefs? I am looking to not wear a harness.