Community Conversation => Transitioning => Gender Correction Surgery => Topic started by: suhani on May 26, 2018, 12:25:13 PM Return to Full Version
Title: vaginal depth and sex
Post by: suhani on May 26, 2018, 12:25:13 PM
Post by: suhani on May 26, 2018, 12:25:13 PM
I'm not sure how to phrase this so i'll do the best I can. According to what I found on google, out of "100 women who had never been pregnant was found that vagina lengths, unstimulated, range from 2.75 inches to about 3¼ inches. When a woman is aroused, it increased to 4.25 inches to 4.75 inches." The question is how do men who have 9 inch penises or bigger fit the entire thing inside the vagina. I know that cis-gendered women have a cervix, but this can not be penetrated. The more important question is, how deep can srs make your vagina and how important is this factor to sex?
Title: Re: vaginal depth and sex
Post by: Dena on May 26, 2018, 12:53:07 PM
Post by: Dena on May 26, 2018, 12:53:07 PM
A gentleman realizes the limitations of the woman he is with and only uses what's available. The sexual sensitivity of a male is mostly in the glans and for a woman it's mostly near the opening so it's not necessary to go really deep.
With surgery, you depth is determined by the amount of material and the space available without running into something so there are no set numbers. I have hear ranges of about 4.5 inches to 8 inches however 5.5 inches to 6 inches is typical. This means that most of the time with a good surgeon, size shouldn't be an issue. What might be more of an issues is girth. I have heard of men who were up to 3 inches in diameter. This would not only be a problem for us but for CIS women as well. Fortunately I don't think this is a real common issue.
With surgery, you depth is determined by the amount of material and the space available without running into something so there are no set numbers. I have hear ranges of about 4.5 inches to 8 inches however 5.5 inches to 6 inches is typical. This means that most of the time with a good surgeon, size shouldn't be an issue. What might be more of an issues is girth. I have heard of men who were up to 3 inches in diameter. This would not only be a problem for us but for CIS women as well. Fortunately I don't think this is a real common issue.
Title: Re: vaginal depth and sex
Post by: suhani on May 28, 2018, 08:53:57 AM
Post by: suhani on May 28, 2018, 08:53:57 AM
I know this seems like a silly question but if i am going through all this hassle I want a vagina that is more than decoration :D. Thanks for your response. :)
Title: Re: vaginal depth and sex
Post by: Maria77 on May 29, 2018, 08:01:35 AM
Post by: Maria77 on May 29, 2018, 08:01:35 AM
I can only speak from my experience. BITD I went through a promiscuous period and slept around quite a bit. Lord knows I don't want to get too graphic, but let's just say I have a lot of donor material, way more than average. I slept with over 30 women and never once met one who couldn't accomodate the equipment. Now on most of them it eventually bottomed out on something (cervix?) and could be uncomfortable for them. The main point is that they did stretch enough to fully accomodate. TBH I don't see how 4 or five inches is going to help if your male partner is larger than average.
Title: Re: vaginal depth and sex
Post by: Mendi on May 29, 2018, 11:35:13 PM
Post by: Mendi on May 29, 2018, 11:35:13 PM
Cis woman cannot take huge things inside them, the cervix will be there and it will hurt, when something touches and stops there.
I´ve discussed with few cis women, who say, that they cannot take big penis inside, due to the fact, that it will hurt when it hits cervix. If Maria77 haven´t encountered such women, congratulations, but that is quite uncommon, from what I have understood.
I´m not really worried about depth. Well, just as long as it´s somewhere near normal range...
I´ve discussed with few cis women, who say, that they cannot take big penis inside, due to the fact, that it will hurt when it hits cervix. If Maria77 haven´t encountered such women, congratulations, but that is quite uncommon, from what I have understood.
I´m not really worried about depth. Well, just as long as it´s somewhere near normal range...