News and Events => Opinions & Editorials => Topic started by: Jessica_Rose on March 10, 2025, 05:13:06 PM Return to Full Version

Title: Federal agencies flag over 100 words that violate Trump’s “anti-woke” initiative
Post by: Jessica_Rose on March 10, 2025, 05:13:06 PM
Federal agencies flag over 100 words that violate Trump's "anti-woke" initiative

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/federal-agencies-flag-over-100-words-that-violate-trump-s-anti-woke-initiative/ar-AA1ADvRG?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=8b41ef287b2540e1f342dfb2c7cece8a&ei=103

Story by Arin Waller (10 March 2025)

Memos from the administration of President Donald Trump, revealed last Friday by the New York Times (NYT), have flagged over 100 words that government agencies should limit or avoid. The Times compiled a full list of the terms from government memos, official and unofficial agency guidances, and other documents.   

The list contains mostly inoffensive phrases and terms, including "black," "women," and "political." The list itself is most likely incomplete, as more agency memos may exist other than the ones already discovered by NYT reporters. It isn't a complete list, but a common theme among the terms listed is that they all relate to diversity and GOP pain points, such as "clean energy" or "injustice."

While the purges have erased transgender and non-binary people, the recently revealed list of terms indicates that other groups could be targeted in the same manner, including Indigenous Americans, African-Americans, gay people, and even women (regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity).

Despite the suppression, President Trump declares himself a champion of free speech, so much so that Trump signed an executive order on his first day back in office titled, "Restoring Freedom of Speech and Ending Federal Censorship," In which it states "Government censorship of speech is intolerable in a free society." The order has largely been understood as providing legal protection to federal employees who exhibit discriminatory behavior.
Title: Re: Federal agencies flag over 100 words that violate Trump’s “anti-woke” initiative
Post by: Lori Dee on March 10, 2025, 05:17:25 PM
It would be interesting to see the entire list of banned terms and phrases.

We could start a new word game, constructing sentences using only the banned words and phrases.  ;D
Title: Re: Federal agencies flag over 100 words that violate Trump’s “anti-woke” initiative
Post by: D'Amalie on March 11, 2025, 04:19:28 PM
I'm in!  Let's play. 

Jessica, can you find the list?
Title: Re: Federal agencies flag over 100 words that violate Trump’s “anti-woke” initiative
Post by: Iztaccihuatl on March 11, 2025, 04:25:03 PM
Quote from: Lori Dee on March 10, 2025, 05:17:25 PMWe could start a new word game, constructing sentences using only the banned words and phrases.  ;D

And then we could create a spam bot to inundate their snitch lines with just these words...
Title: Re: Federal agencies flag over 100 words that violate Trump’s “anti-woke” initiative
Post by: Lori Dee on March 11, 2025, 04:50:49 PM
Quote from: Iztaccihuatl on March 11, 2025, 04:25:03 PMAnd then we could create a spam bot to inundate their snitch lines with just these words...

I love your brain!
Title: Re: Federal agencies flag over 100 words that violate Trump’s “anti-woke” initiative
Post by: Jessica_Rose on March 11, 2025, 06:25:11 PM
Here is the list...

accessible
activism
activists
advocacy
advocate
advocates
affirming care
all-inclusive
allyship
anti-racism
antiracist
assigned at birth
assigned female at birth
assigned male at birth
at risk
barrier
barriers
belong
bias
biased
biased toward
biases
biases towards
biologically female
biologically male
BIPOC
Black
breastfeed + people
breastfeed + person
chestfeed + people
chestfeed + person
clean energy
climate crisis
climate science
commercial sex worker
community diversity
community equity
confirmation bias
cultural competence
cultural differences
cultural heritage
cultural sensitivity
culturally appropriate
culturally responsive
DEI
DEIA
DEIAB
DEIJ
disabilities
disability
discriminated
discrimination
discriminatory
disparity
diverse
diverse backgrounds
diverse communities
diverse community
diverse group
diverse groups
diversified
diversify
diversifying
diversity
enhance the diversity
enhancing diversity
environmental quality
equal opportunity
equality
equitable
equitableness
equity
ethnicity
excluded
exclusion
expression
female
females
feminism
fostering inclusivity
GBV
gender
gender based
gender based violence
gender diversity
gender identity
gender ideology
gender-affirming care
genders
Gulf of Mexico
hate speech
health disparity
health equity
hispanic minority
historically
identity
immigrants
implicit bias
implicit biases
inclusion
inclusive
inclusive leadership
inclusiveness
inclusivity
increase diversity
increase the diversity
indigenous community
inequalities
inequality
inequitable
inequities
inequity
injustice
institutional
intersectional
intersectionality
key groups
key people
key populations
Latinx
LGBT
LGBTQ
marginalize
marginalized
men who have sex with men
mental health
minorities
minority
most risk
MSM
multicultural
Mx
Native American
non-binary
nonbinary
oppression
oppression
oppressive
orientation
people + uterus
people-centered care
person-centered
person-centered care
polarization
political
pollution
pregnant people
pregnant person
pregnant persons
prejudice
privilege
privileges
promote diversity
promoting diversity
pronoun
pronouns
prostitute
race
race and ethnicity
racial
racial diversity
racial identity
racial inequality
racial justice
racially
racism
segregation
sense of belonging
sex
sexual preferences
sexuality
social justice
sociocultural
socioeconomic
status
stereotype
stereotypes
systemic
systemically
they/them
trans
transgender
transsexual
trauma
traumatic
tribal
unconscious bias
underappreciated
underprivileged
underrepresentation
underrepresented
underserved
undervalued
victim
victims
vulnerable populations
women
women and underrepresented

Notes: Some terms listed with a plus sign represent combinations of words that, when used together, acknowledge transgender people, which is not in keeping with the current federal government's position that there are only two, immutable sexes. Any term collected above was included on at least one agency's list, which does not necessarily imply that other agencies are also discouraged from using it.

The above terms appeared in government memos, in official and unofficial agency guidance and in other documents viewed by The New York Times. Some ordered the removal of these words from public-facing websites, or ordered the elimination of other materials (including school curricula) in which they might be included.
Title: Re: Federal agencies flag over 100 words that violate Trump’s “anti-woke” initiative
Post by: Lori Dee on March 11, 2025, 07:45:26 PM
Wow. How does any government agency function without including the word "status" in their reports?

Military radio traffic: "Bravo Six Alpha, what's your <bleeped>?

 ???
Title: Re: Federal agencies flag over 100 words that violate Trump’s “anti-woke” initiative
Post by: D'Amalie on March 12, 2025, 08:27:08 AM
Oh my stars!  What a list.  Almost impossible to not use these these words, especially in governance!
The loss of 70 years of progress.  Fostering intolerance AGAIN!

And no wonder I don't want to leave the house.
Title: Re: Federal agencies flag over 100 words that violate Trump’s “anti-woke” initiative
Post by: Lori Dee on March 12, 2025, 09:13:32 AM
Interesting that "pride" did not make the list, but "political" did.

I am wondering how the Veterans Administration will be able to function without using medical terms like "status", "disability", "historically", "men", "women", "female", "trauma", "systemic", "mental health", "accessible", "at-risk", and "belong".
Title: Re: Federal agencies flag over 100 words that violate Trump’s “anti-woke” initiative
Post by: D'Amalie on March 12, 2025, 02:09:06 PM
I'm cautious now about being out at the VA.  I'm losing my trust.  When queried, "Are LGBTQ+ rights and treatments impacted by the DoD policy changes last week? Situation is frightening."  My caregivers at the LGBTQ+ Services replied:  "Dear Richelle, We have seen the policy changes from the new administration you are referring to, and understand how the situation is concerning.  For now, I have spoken to our our acting Chief of Staff, and she has assured me that at this moment we don't have any guidance to modify any of our clinical care in this area... and all of your providers remain ready to support you."
Title: Re: Federal agencies flag over 100 words that violate Trump’s “anti-woke” initiative
Post by: Lori Dee on March 12, 2025, 02:28:12 PM
Quote from: D'Amalie on March 12, 2025, 02:09:06 PMI'm cautious now about being out at the VA.  I'm losing my trust.  When queried, "Are LGBTQ+ rights and treatments impacted by the DoD policy changes last week? Situation is frightening."  My caregivers at the LGBTQ+ Services replied:  "Dear Richelle, We have seen the policy changes from the new administration you are referring to, and understand how the situation is concerning.  For now, I have spoken to our our acting Chief of Staff, and she has assured me that at this moment we don't have any guidance to modify any of our clinical care in this area... and all of your providers remain ready to support you."

That was the response I got as well.

My Primary specified that as long as she is my Primary and the Rapid City Clinic is my treatment facility, my treatment will not change.

My concern is that when I move, I will have a new facility and a new Primary. Does that mean the changes only apply to "new" patients? So far, the VA website has not been scrubbed thoroughly, and there are still references to Gender Affirming Care. I am watching it closely.

https://www.patientcare.va.gov/lgbt/
Title: Re: Federal agencies flag over 100 words that violate Trump’s “anti-woke” initiative
Post by: MaryT on March 13, 2025, 12:20:45 PM
" 'The Eleventh Edition is the definitive edition,' he said. 'We're getting
the language into its final shape--the shape it's going to have when nobody
speaks anything else. When we've finished with it, people like you will
have to learn it all over again. You think, I dare say, that our chief job
is inventing new words. But not a bit of it! We're destroying words--scores
of them, hundreds of them, every day. We're cutting the language down to
the bone. The Eleventh Edition won't contain a single word that will become
obsolete before the year 2050.'

He bit hungrily into his bread and swallowed a couple of mouthfuls, then
continued speaking, with a sort of pedant's passion. His thin dark face
had become animated, his eyes had lost their mocking expression and grown
almost dreamy.

'It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words. Of course the great
wastage is in the verbs and adjectives, but there are hundreds of nouns
that can be got rid of as well. It isn't only the synonyms; there are also
the antonyms. After all, what justification is there for a word which is
simply the opposite of some other word? A word contains its opposite in
itself. Take "good", for instance. If you have a word like "good", what
need is there for a word like "bad"? "Ungood" will do just as well--better,
because it's an exact opposite, which the other is not. Or again, if you
want a stronger version of "good", what sense is there in having a whole
string of vague useless words like "excellent" and "splendid" and all the
rest of them? "Plusgood" covers the meaning, or "doubleplusgood" if you
want something stronger still. Of course we use those forms already. but
in the final version of Newspeak there'll be nothing else. In the end the
whole notion of goodness and badness will be covered by only six words--in
reality, only one word. Don't you see the beauty of that, Winston? It was
B.B.'s idea originally, of course,' he added as an afterthought.

A sort of vapid eagerness flitted across Winston's face at the mention of
Big Brother. Nevertheless Syme immediately detected a certain lack of
enthusiasm.

'You haven't a real appreciation of Newspeak, Winston,' he said almost
sadly. 'Even when you write it you're still thinking in Oldspeak. I've read
some of those pieces that you write in "The Times" occasionally. They're
good enough, but they're translations. In your heart you'd prefer to stick
to Oldspeak, with all its vagueness and its useless shades of meaning.
You don't grasp the beauty of the destruction of words. Do you know that
Newspeak is the only language in the world whose vocabulary gets smaller
every year?'

Winston did know that, of course. He smiled, sympathetically he hoped, not
trusting himself to speak. Syme bit off another fragment of the
dark-coloured bread, chewed it briefly, and went on:

'Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of
thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible,
because there will be no words in which to express it. Every concept that
can ever be needed, will be expressed by exactly one word, with its meaning
rigidly defined and all its subsidiary meanings rubbed out and forgotten.
Already, in the Eleventh Edition, we're not far from that point. But the
process will still be continuing long after you and I are dead. Every year
fewer and fewer words, and the range of consciousness always a little
smaller. Even now, of course, there's no reason or excuse for committing
thoughtcrime. It's merely a question of self-discipline, reality-control.
But in the end there won't be any need even for that. The Revolution will
be complete when the language is perfect. Newspeak is Ingsoc and Ingsoc
is Newspeak,' he added with a sort of mystical satisfaction. 'Has it ever
occurred to you, Winston, that by the year 2050, at the very latest, not a
single human being will be alive who could understand such a conversation
as we are having now?'

'Except----' began Winston doubtfully, and he stopped.

It had been on the tip of his tongue to say 'Except the proles,' but he
checked himself, not feeling fully certain that this remark was not in
some way unorthodox. Syme, however, had divined what he was about to say.

'The proles are not human beings,' he said carelessly. 'By 2050--earlier,
probably--all real knowledge of Oldspeak will have disappeared. The whole
literature of the past will have been destroyed. Chaucer, Shakespeare,
Milton, Byron--they'll exist only in Newspeak versions, not merely changed
into something different, but actually changed into something contradictory
of what they used to be. Even the literature of the Party will change.
Even the slogans will change. How could you have a slogan like "freedom is
slavery" when the concept of freedom has been abolished? The whole climate
of thought will be different. In fact there will be no thought, as we
understand it now. Orthodoxy means not thinking--not needing to think.
Orthodoxy is unconsciousness.' "

From 1984.

..................................

Do you know that Newspeak American is the only language in the world whose vocabulary gets smaller
every year?
Title: Re: Federal agencies flag over 100 words that violate Trump’s “anti-woke” initiative
Post by: D'Amalie on March 13, 2025, 03:05:21 PM
Fascinating!  Never read it, or maybe I have, back 50 years ago.  I get the cultural references frequently and understand them.  Its looking like I'd better get a copy.
Title: Re: Federal agencies flag over 100 words that violate Trump’s “anti-woke” initiative
Post by: Sephirah on March 13, 2025, 07:21:00 PM
Yeah some people are just cancerous for the world. And some people are bad for supporting them. It's crazy.

Every sci fi writer who ever dreamed something like this... to see it actually happen must be monumentally freaky.
Title: Re: Federal agencies flag over 100 words that violate Trump’s “anti-woke” initiative
Post by: Lori Dee on March 20, 2025, 10:48:20 PM
Quote from: Lori Dee on March 10, 2025, 05:17:25 PMIt would be interesting to see the entire list of banned terms and phrases.

We could start a new word game, constructing sentences using only the banned words and phrases.  ;D

Someone stole my idea!  ;D

https://www.advocate.com/news/trump-banned-words-crossword-puzzle
Title: Re: Federal agencies flag over 100 words that violate Trump’s “anti-woke” initiative
Post by: ChrissyRyan on March 21, 2025, 05:30:27 PM
Really?

Gee.


Chrissy