Community Conversation => Military Veterans Confab => Topic started by: Jessica_Rose on June 29, 2026, 05:23:18 PM Return to Full Version
Title: Court to weigh class action status in trans military ban challenge
Post by: Jessica_Rose on June 29, 2026, 05:23:18 PM
Post by: Jessica_Rose on June 29, 2026, 05:23:18 PM
Court to weigh class action status in trans military ban challenge
https://www.washingtonblade.com/2026/06/29/court-to-weigh-class-action-status-in-trans-military-ban-challenge/
Joe Reberkenny (29 June 2026)
In January 2025, President Donald Trump signed Executive Order 14183, titled "Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness," directing the Pentagon to prohibit transgender, nonbinary, and gender-nonconforming people from serving in the military.
The Trump-Vance administration and Defense Department argued that trans people are inherently incapable of meeting the military's "high standards of readiness, lethality, cohesion, honesty, humility, uniformity, and integrity," citing a history or signs of gender dysphoria. According to the Pentagon this creates "medical, surgical, and mental health constraints on [an] individual." Regardless of their physical or intellectual capabilities, transgender applicants are now considered less qualified than their cisgender peers.
Almost immediately after the executive order was signed, LGBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD Law) and the National Center for LGBTQ Rights filed a federal lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia challenging the order.
The Washington Blade spoke with Michael Haley, a staff attorney at GLAD Law who is part of the legal team challenging the ban and seeking to protect the constitutional rights of transgender service members.
"It will be extremely hard for any court to deny that a policy that identifies a group of people and calls them dishonest, lacking integrity, and lacking a warrior spirit — in spite of all the evidence — is motivated by animus. That's an argument under the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution, which says everybody is entitled to equal protection of the laws and forbids singling out a group of people and treating them disfavorably just because you don't like them rather than because of some legitimate purpose ... I think that's going to be the central question."
https://www.washingtonblade.com/2026/06/29/court-to-weigh-class-action-status-in-trans-military-ban-challenge/
Joe Reberkenny (29 June 2026)
In January 2025, President Donald Trump signed Executive Order 14183, titled "Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness," directing the Pentagon to prohibit transgender, nonbinary, and gender-nonconforming people from serving in the military.
The Trump-Vance administration and Defense Department argued that trans people are inherently incapable of meeting the military's "high standards of readiness, lethality, cohesion, honesty, humility, uniformity, and integrity," citing a history or signs of gender dysphoria. According to the Pentagon this creates "medical, surgical, and mental health constraints on [an] individual." Regardless of their physical or intellectual capabilities, transgender applicants are now considered less qualified than their cisgender peers.
Almost immediately after the executive order was signed, LGBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD Law) and the National Center for LGBTQ Rights filed a federal lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia challenging the order.
The Washington Blade spoke with Michael Haley, a staff attorney at GLAD Law who is part of the legal team challenging the ban and seeking to protect the constitutional rights of transgender service members.
"It will be extremely hard for any court to deny that a policy that identifies a group of people and calls them dishonest, lacking integrity, and lacking a warrior spirit — in spite of all the evidence — is motivated by animus. That's an argument under the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution, which says everybody is entitled to equal protection of the laws and forbids singling out a group of people and treating them disfavorably just because you don't like them rather than because of some legitimate purpose ... I think that's going to be the central question."
Title: Re: Court to weigh class action status in trans military ban challenge
Post by: Lori Dee on June 29, 2026, 05:34:13 PM
Post by: Lori Dee on June 29, 2026, 05:34:13 PM
I hope GLAD Law also mentions that thousands of transgender military members have served throughout history and, therefore, the class must also extend, by definition, to all veterans.