News and Events => Political and Legal News => Topic started by: Sarah B on July 26, 2026, 07:03:51 PM Return to Full Version
Title: NZ Bill Seeking To Legally Define Terms ‘Man’ And ‘Woman’ Passes First Reading
Post by: Sarah B on July 26, 2026, 07:03:51 PM
Post by: Sarah B on July 26, 2026, 07:03:51 PM
Title: NZ Bill Seeking To Legally Define The Terms 'Man' And 'Woman' Passes First Reading
Link To: Article (https://www.starobserver.com.au/news/nz-bill-man-woman/241908)
Author: Patrick Lenton
Date: May 21, 2026
Trigger Warning: This article discusses abuse.
Brief summary of the article
New Zealand's Parliament has voted to advance a bill that would legally define the terms "woman" and "man" in national law. The bill, introduced by New Zealand First MP Jenny Marcroft, passed its first reading and will proceed to select committee scrutiny. The article reports criticism from LGBTQIA+ advocates, legal experts and opposition MPs, who warned it could increase discrimination against transgender and gender-diverse people.
Main Points of the Article
"New Zealand's Parliament has voted to advance a bill seeking to legally define the terms "woman" and "man", prompting criticism from LGBTQIA+ advocates, legal experts and opposition MPs."
"The bill proposes defining a woman as "an adult human biological female" and a man as "an adult human biological male" within New Zealand law."
"However, critics said the proposed changes could increase discrimination against transgender and gender-diverse people while offering little legal effect."
""Bills like this cause real world harm and we condemn it wholeheartedly," said Green Party Takatāpui and Rainbow Communities spokesperson Kahurangi Carter."
"A Te Pāti Māori spokesperson said it was "legislative erasure of trans people" which "had no place in Aotearoa"."
"The bill's passage at first reading does not guarantee it will become law."
Best Wishes Always
Sarah B
Global Moderator
Link To: Article (https://www.starobserver.com.au/news/nz-bill-man-woman/241908)
Author: Patrick Lenton
Date: May 21, 2026
Trigger Warning: This article discusses abuse.
Brief summary of the article
New Zealand's Parliament has voted to advance a bill that would legally define the terms "woman" and "man" in national law. The bill, introduced by New Zealand First MP Jenny Marcroft, passed its first reading and will proceed to select committee scrutiny. The article reports criticism from LGBTQIA+ advocates, legal experts and opposition MPs, who warned it could increase discrimination against transgender and gender-diverse people.
Main Points of the Article
"New Zealand's Parliament has voted to advance a bill seeking to legally define the terms "woman" and "man", prompting criticism from LGBTQIA+ advocates, legal experts and opposition MPs."
"The bill proposes defining a woman as "an adult human biological female" and a man as "an adult human biological male" within New Zealand law."
"However, critics said the proposed changes could increase discrimination against transgender and gender-diverse people while offering little legal effect."
""Bills like this cause real world harm and we condemn it wholeheartedly," said Green Party Takatāpui and Rainbow Communities spokesperson Kahurangi Carter."
"A Te Pāti Māori spokesperson said it was "legislative erasure of trans people" which "had no place in Aotearoa"."
"The bill's passage at first reading does not guarantee it will become law."
Best Wishes Always
Sarah B
Global Moderator
Title: Re: NZ Bill Seeking To Legally Define Terms ‘Man’ And ‘Woman’ Passes First Reading
Post by: Lori Dee on July 26, 2026, 07:48:19 PM
Post by: Lori Dee on July 26, 2026, 07:48:19 PM
The problem with these types of laws is that there is little to no legal need for such a definition.
I am old enough to remember when all legal texts used he/him, and it was declared or assumed that meant everyone, including she/her. Later, textbooks and other government documents added a disclaimer stating that the pronouns he or him equally applied to both males and females.
Within our own Declaration of Independence, it states that "..all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
Are we to assume that the U.S., N.Z., and similar countries are making this move to deny equal rights to everyone except "adult human biological males"?
I am old enough to remember when all legal texts used he/him, and it was declared or assumed that meant everyone, including she/her. Later, textbooks and other government documents added a disclaimer stating that the pronouns he or him equally applied to both males and females.
Within our own Declaration of Independence, it states that "..all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
Are we to assume that the U.S., N.Z., and similar countries are making this move to deny equal rights to everyone except "adult human biological males"?
Title: Re: NZ Bill Seeking To Legally Define Terms ‘Man’ And ‘Woman’ Passes First Reading
Post by: Jillian-TG on July 26, 2026, 10:04:37 PM
Post by: Jillian-TG on July 26, 2026, 10:04:37 PM
Good luck defining an intersex person as male or female.
SMH 🤦�♀️
SMH 🤦�♀️