Site News and Information => Community alerts => Topic started by: Brenda on June 08, 2005, 07:46:20 AM Return to Full Version
Title: Cross Dressing Teacher Sues Georgetown College
Post by: Brenda on June 08, 2005, 07:46:20 AM
Post by: Brenda on June 08, 2005, 07:46:20 AM
Cross Dressing Teacher Sues Georgetown College (http://www.thewmurchannel.com/education/4574795/detail.html?rss=man&psp=irresistible)
Man Also Sued Restaurants He Was Thrown Out Of
POSTED: 2:27 pm EDT June 6, 2005
GEORGETOWN, Ky. -- A sociology teacher who was thrown out of two Lexington restaurants for wearing women's clothing is suing Georgetown College for sexual discrimination.
Jeremy D. Kerr alleged in a lawsuit that Georgetown discriminated against him when it declined to rehire him last fall after rumors circulated that he had been seen wearing women's clothing.
Read More (http://www.thewmurchannel.com/education/4574795/detail.html?rss=man&psp=irresistible)
Man Also Sued Restaurants He Was Thrown Out Of
POSTED: 2:27 pm EDT June 6, 2005
GEORGETOWN, Ky. -- A sociology teacher who was thrown out of two Lexington restaurants for wearing women's clothing is suing Georgetown College for sexual discrimination.
Jeremy D. Kerr alleged in a lawsuit that Georgetown discriminated against him when it declined to rehire him last fall after rumors circulated that he had been seen wearing women's clothing.
Read More (http://www.thewmurchannel.com/education/4574795/detail.html?rss=man&psp=irresistible)
Title: Re: Cross Dressing Teacher Sues Georgetown College
Post by: Svetlana on June 08, 2005, 04:29:45 PM
Post by: Svetlana on June 08, 2005, 04:29:45 PM
if he was ejected for wearing clothing that any woman wouldn't have been ejected for wearing, then absolutely fair dues on the discrimination charge, as that's precisely what it is. and good luck to him.
if he was ejected for wearing excessively taboo clothing that anybody would've been ejected for wearing, then he's just taking advantage. on that count, it's nothing to do with discrimination, and is rather a uniform policy and/or public decency issue.
if he was ejected for wearing excessively taboo clothing that anybody would've been ejected for wearing, then he's just taking advantage. on that count, it's nothing to do with discrimination, and is rather a uniform policy and/or public decency issue.