News and Events => Opinions & Editorials => Topic started by: Natasha on May 26, 2008, 10:16:38 AM Return to Full Version
Title: Sex change for traffic signals (blog/commentary)
Post by: Natasha on May 26, 2008, 10:16:38 AM
Post by: Natasha on May 26, 2008, 10:16:38 AM
Sex change for traffic signals
http://www.cphpost.dk/get/107377.html
5/26/2008
"The current 'walk' and 'don't walk' lights depict the silhouette of
a male figure. But if the move was intended to represent gender
equality, Hanne Bille, president of the Association for Equality,
wasn't impressed, calling the plan 'strange' and 'a waste of money'."
http://www.cphpost.dk/get/107377.html
5/26/2008
"The current 'walk' and 'don't walk' lights depict the silhouette of
a male figure. But if the move was intended to represent gender
equality, Hanne Bille, president of the Association for Equality,
wasn't impressed, calling the plan 'strange' and 'a waste of money'."
Title: Re: Sex change for traffic signals (blog/commentary)
Post by: Rachael on May 26, 2008, 11:28:07 AM
Post by: Rachael on May 26, 2008, 11:28:07 AM
if you are offended by a crossing sign. please leave the plannet....
its a stick figure. get over it.
R >:D
its a stick figure. get over it.
R >:D
Title: Re: Sex change for traffic signals (blog/commentary)
Post by: tinkerbell on May 26, 2008, 11:14:02 PM
Post by: tinkerbell on May 26, 2008, 11:14:02 PM
::) I agree with Rachael. This is the most moronic thing I have ever heard. I mean...come on! get real people! Sheesh!
tink :icon_chick:
tink :icon_chick:
Title: Re: Sex change for traffic signals (blog/commentary)
Post by: Ms Bev on May 26, 2008, 11:36:27 PM
Post by: Ms Bev on May 26, 2008, 11:36:27 PM
some people waste time on the dumbest crap......../color]
Title: Re: Sex change for traffic signals (blog/commentary)
Post by: cindybc on May 27, 2008, 12:53:12 AM
Post by: cindybc on May 27, 2008, 12:53:12 AM
And the old dog laughed to see such sport, LOL
Cindy
Cindy