News and Events => Opinions & Editorials => Topic started by: Natasha on October 20, 2008, 05:13:35 PM Return to Full Version
Title: Prop 8: Why It Is Wrong To Reject Gay Marriage
Post by: Natasha on October 20, 2008, 05:13:35 PM
Post by: Natasha on October 20, 2008, 05:13:35 PM
Prop 8: Why It Is Wrong To Reject Gay Marriage
http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do;jsessionid=687607EF2713FAEC87556B97C66C5ED6?diaryId=7670 (http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do;jsessionid=687607EF2713FAEC87556B97C66C5ED6?diaryId=7670)
Daniel DiRito
Mon Oct 20, 2008 at 14:28:41 PM EDT
As I've thought about Proposition 8, the California ballot initiative designed to deny gays the right to marry, and what I could do to oppose it, I've continued to come back to a missive I wrote nearly eighteen months ago. I'm of the mind that in order to discuss gay marriage, one must understand the state and meaning of marriage as it exists today, what impact, if any, gay marriage may have upon the institution of marriage, the progression of gay culture, and what is at stake for the gay community.
All too often, those opposed to gay marriage speak of it in terms of the harm it will do to their marriages. I summarily reject that premise...contending instead that whatever ails marriage has little, if anything, to do with homosexuality. It's also true that the quality of love isn't heightened with the attachment of a state approved license any more than it is diminished by its absence. Notwithstanding, the decision to deny that affirmation to gays is a tacit rejection of the merits of love.
http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do;jsessionid=687607EF2713FAEC87556B97C66C5ED6?diaryId=7670 (http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do;jsessionid=687607EF2713FAEC87556B97C66C5ED6?diaryId=7670)
Daniel DiRito
Mon Oct 20, 2008 at 14:28:41 PM EDT
As I've thought about Proposition 8, the California ballot initiative designed to deny gays the right to marry, and what I could do to oppose it, I've continued to come back to a missive I wrote nearly eighteen months ago. I'm of the mind that in order to discuss gay marriage, one must understand the state and meaning of marriage as it exists today, what impact, if any, gay marriage may have upon the institution of marriage, the progression of gay culture, and what is at stake for the gay community.
All too often, those opposed to gay marriage speak of it in terms of the harm it will do to their marriages. I summarily reject that premise...contending instead that whatever ails marriage has little, if anything, to do with homosexuality. It's also true that the quality of love isn't heightened with the attachment of a state approved license any more than it is diminished by its absence. Notwithstanding, the decision to deny that affirmation to gays is a tacit rejection of the merits of love.