News and Events => Opinions & Editorials => Topic started by: Natasha on December 01, 2008, 05:20:30 PM Return to Full Version
Title: NY Appellate Division Rules on Transsexual Name-Change Petition
Post by: Natasha on December 01, 2008, 05:20:30 PM
Post by: Natasha on December 01, 2008, 05:20:30 PM
NY Appellate Division Rules on Transsexual Name-Change Petition
http://newyorklawschool.typepad.com/leonardlink/2008/11/ny-appellate-division-rules-on-transsexual-namechange-petition.html (http://newyorklawschool.typepad.com/leonardlink/2008/11/ny-appellate-division-rules-on-transsexual-namechange-petition.html)
11/28/2008
Rejecting a trial judge's objection that a gendered name-change would cause "confusion," a unanimous panel of the New York Appellate Division, 3rd Department, ruled on November 26 in _Matter of Earl William Golden III_, No. 504992, that the trial court should have ordered the name change, but should include in its order a statement
that the name change could not be used as proof of a change of sex. Franklin Romeo of the Sylvia Rivera Law Project represented Golden on the appeal.
http://newyorklawschool.typepad.com/leonardlink/2008/11/ny-appellate-division-rules-on-transsexual-namechange-petition.html (http://newyorklawschool.typepad.com/leonardlink/2008/11/ny-appellate-division-rules-on-transsexual-namechange-petition.html)
11/28/2008
Rejecting a trial judge's objection that a gendered name-change would cause "confusion," a unanimous panel of the New York Appellate Division, 3rd Department, ruled on November 26 in _Matter of Earl William Golden III_, No. 504992, that the trial court should have ordered the name change, but should include in its order a statement
that the name change could not be used as proof of a change of sex. Franklin Romeo of the Sylvia Rivera Law Project represented Golden on the appeal.