News and Events => Opinions & Editorials => Topic started by: Hazumu on January 26, 2009, 11:12:51 PM Return to Full Version
Title: Anti-Gay Arguments We Don’t Bother With (And Should): Part 1
Post by: Hazumu on January 26, 2009, 11:12:51 PM
Post by: Hazumu on January 26, 2009, 11:12:51 PM
Gabriel Arana
January 26th, 2009
BOX TURTLE BULLETIN
(https://www.susans.org/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.boxturtlebulletin.com%2Fbtb%2Fwp-content%2Fthemes%2FBTB2.2%2FImages%2FTurtle83x100.gif&hash=111f4138b8fa1ff4de27103a6b9df8e6aee6b7e6) (http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/01/26/8387)
January 26th, 2009
BOX TURTLE BULLETIN
(https://www.susans.org/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.boxturtlebulletin.com%2Fbtb%2Fwp-content%2Fthemes%2FBTB2.2%2FImages%2FTurtle83x100.gif&hash=111f4138b8fa1ff4de27103a6b9df8e6aee6b7e6) (http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/01/26/8387)
QuoteI wanted to dedicate a series of posts (five in total) to crazy anti-gay arguments and encourage BTB's readers to respond to and engage them below.Quote#1: Any man — even a gay one — can marry a woman. Therefore, it is not discriminatory to deny marriage rights to members of the same sex given that a straight man can't marry a man, either.
What irritates me about this is that it very obviously misses the point and tries to win the argument on a technicality: "Aha! The law treats everyone the same — I can't marry someone of the same sex and neither can you." Underlying the argument is a very amateur understanding of what it means for the law to "treat everyone the same."