News and Events => Opinions & Editorials => Topic started by: Shana A on January 17, 2010, 12:00:58 PM Return to Full Version
Title: Coakley’s Support of “Transgender Rights” Would Force Taxpayers to Fund Murderer
Post by: Shana A on January 17, 2010, 12:00:58 PM
Post by: Shana A on January 17, 2010, 12:00:58 PM
Saturday, January 16, 2010
Coakley's Support of "Transgender Rights" Would Force Taxpayers to Fund Murderer's Trans Procedures
http://massresistance.blogspot.com/2010/01/coakleys-support-of-transgender-rights.html?zx=5517009f5314f5d6 (http://massresistance.blogspot.com/2010/01/coakleys-support-of-transgender-rights.html?zx=5517009f5314f5d6)
The ultra-leftist Huffington Post thinks Scott Brown is a bad guy ... for opposing taxpayer-funded sex-change procedures demanded by a convicted murderer.
According to the Huffington Post, it's bad enough Brown opposes homosexual "marriage" -- but then they go on to list this as another of his bad deeds:
"The two-time incumbent [Brown] took a firm stance on opposing the request of a convicted murderer for a sex-change operation."
Coakley's Support of "Transgender Rights" Would Force Taxpayers to Fund Murderer's Trans Procedures
http://massresistance.blogspot.com/2010/01/coakleys-support-of-transgender-rights.html?zx=5517009f5314f5d6 (http://massresistance.blogspot.com/2010/01/coakleys-support-of-transgender-rights.html?zx=5517009f5314f5d6)
The ultra-leftist Huffington Post thinks Scott Brown is a bad guy ... for opposing taxpayer-funded sex-change procedures demanded by a convicted murderer.
According to the Huffington Post, it's bad enough Brown opposes homosexual "marriage" -- but then they go on to list this as another of his bad deeds:
"The two-time incumbent [Brown] took a firm stance on opposing the request of a convicted murderer for a sex-change operation."
Title: Re: Coakley’s Support of “Transgender Rights” Would Force Taxpayers to Fund Murderer
Post by: Allamakee on January 17, 2010, 10:35:25 PM
Post by: Allamakee on January 17, 2010, 10:35:25 PM
Wow, if a comedian wanted to create a parody of crazy right wing group, they would be hard pressed to outdo Mass Resistance. The group supports Brown's opposition to prisons paying for SRS, which is reasonable, but then jumps to the the bizarre claim that the Massachusetts gender rights bill would mandate such coverage. And their evidence for this claim? One of their older articles, which merely conjectures that maybe it would happen (even though no there is no precedent in the US nor any such provision in the bill.)
I've heard jokes about bloggers citing themselves as authoritative sources to back up their claims, but this is a real life instance of such silliness.
I've heard jokes about bloggers citing themselves as authoritative sources to back up their claims, but this is a real life instance of such silliness.
Title: Re: Coakley’s Support of “Transgender Rights” Would Force Taxpayers to Fund Murderer
Post by: Shana A on January 17, 2010, 11:10:47 PM
Post by: Shana A on January 17, 2010, 11:10:47 PM
Quote from: Allamakee on January 17, 2010, 10:35:25 PM
Wow, if a comedian wanted to create a parody of crazy right wing group, they would be hard pressed to outdo Mass Resistance.
Yes, they're quite unbelievable, except that unfortunately they're for real! They have a lot of money and have successfully and negatively influenced the outcome of votes in MA. Let's hope they don't get their way on Tues.
Z