News and Events => Opinions & Editorials => Topic started by: Shana A on November 30, 2010, 09:20:50 AM Return to Full Version
Title: McInerny May Be Adult Before Case Goes to Trial
Post by: Shana A on November 30, 2010, 09:20:50 AM
Post by: Shana A on November 30, 2010, 09:20:50 AM
McInerny May Be Adult Before Case Goes to Trial
November 29, 2010 – By Mary Ingalls and Kat Ingalls
http://lezgetreal.com/2010/11/mcinerny-may-be-adult-before-case-goes-to-trial/ (http://lezgetreal.com/2010/11/mcinerny-may-be-adult-before-case-goes-to-trial/)
In a pretrial motion hearing that was all too predictable, defense attorneys for Brandon McInerny were the cause of yet another delay in proceedings for the case of People v McInerny. McInerny shot gay identified, transgendered/questioning classmate Larry King execution style in front of a classroom full of students on February 12, 2008. Today's motion was yet another attempt to have Deputy District Attorney Maeve Fox recused from the trial. The motion stated that there was a conflict of interest, because hey, Maeve Fox's interest in getting justice for Larry King conflicts with Defense attorney's goal of getting King's killer a slap on the wrist.
One of the defense's goals was to have the Attorney General try the case in Maeve Fox's stead, which made it especially delightful when the Deputy Attorney General David Glassman tore the pitifully constructed motion for recusal to shreds in less than three sentences.
November 29, 2010 – By Mary Ingalls and Kat Ingalls
http://lezgetreal.com/2010/11/mcinerny-may-be-adult-before-case-goes-to-trial/ (http://lezgetreal.com/2010/11/mcinerny-may-be-adult-before-case-goes-to-trial/)
In a pretrial motion hearing that was all too predictable, defense attorneys for Brandon McInerny were the cause of yet another delay in proceedings for the case of People v McInerny. McInerny shot gay identified, transgendered/questioning classmate Larry King execution style in front of a classroom full of students on February 12, 2008. Today's motion was yet another attempt to have Deputy District Attorney Maeve Fox recused from the trial. The motion stated that there was a conflict of interest, because hey, Maeve Fox's interest in getting justice for Larry King conflicts with Defense attorney's goal of getting King's killer a slap on the wrist.
One of the defense's goals was to have the Attorney General try the case in Maeve Fox's stead, which made it especially delightful when the Deputy Attorney General David Glassman tore the pitifully constructed motion for recusal to shreds in less than three sentences.