Community Conversation => Female to male transsexual talk (FTM) => Transsexual talk => FTM Gear => Topic started by: xAndrewx on January 27, 2011, 06:54:08 PM Return to Full Version

Title: Would this cheap packer work well?
Post by: xAndrewx on January 27, 2011, 06:54:08 PM
Randomly came across this and was wondering what ya'll thought? It's like $8 plus shipping. Opinions? I'd get it and try it out but I'm broke. Maybe when I get cash I'll give it a shot.

http://www.sextoy.com/prod_info.php?a=stcppc&pnum=CNVELD-DJ5003-01 (http://www.sextoy.com/prod_info.php?a=stcppc&pnum=CNVELD-DJ5003-01)

Mods: Feel free to remove the link if I'm not allowed to post it. If so... sorry!
Title: Re: Would this cheap packer work well?
Post by: Noah G. on January 27, 2011, 07:10:52 PM
My guess is it wouldn't work well for packing unless you want to hard-pack. Actually, I'd bet money on it.

I think it's just a small dildo, so not really suitable to packing (i.e. not at all flexible enough to be arranged like a packer would be able to be). I think, if you want an inexpensive packer (that you don't have to worry about bursting, like the hair gel in condoms route), you might as well go with the Soft Pack from Babeland. A lot of guys seem to like it, you can pack with it, and it's a $16-$22 range for all four sizes. Or you could get the GV Sailor Soft Pack for $24-$28 for their two sizes. I think it'd be a better investment than a 3" hard-on, given what I imagine you're looking for.
Title: Re: Would this cheap packer work well?
Post by: xAndrewx on January 27, 2011, 07:40:21 PM
I actually have a medium sized packy (too big for me imo) that only cost me $14 from early2bed but I came across that and saw soft and rubber. Thought it might be a cheaper solution.

I'm gonna go with a smaller one from early2bed this time around because I liked it but just thought the other one might be helpful to others.
Title: Re: Would this cheap packer work well?
Post by: EthanD on February 03, 2011, 12:11:23 PM
I have a the Babeland mini soft pack ($16) that has been great for me. It also passes the "squeeze test" quite well from what I have been told. ;)  Other packers gave me too much of a bulge when I tried them. I agree with Noah in reference to the link. It seems like more of a hard packer.