Susan's Place Transgender Resources

An Uncircumcised STP Packer..

Do they exist?  I have been looking all over searching in google and searching in links from this site and I can't find one.   I did find an uncircumcised packer, only one, but it wasn't a STP. 

Those seem...... inconvenient.

Hahahah

yeah actually they exist. but they are very expensive. Like Real has some.

Lola Jake has a few. Not sure about the cost or how realistic it looks.

Quote from: ~RoadToTrista~ on May 16, 2011, 09:42:36 PM
Those seem...... inconvenient.

thank you for this helpful comment...

Quote from: ~RoadToTrista~ on May 16, 2011, 09:42:36 PM
Those seem...... inconvenient.

Oh, thanks. 
I already looked on Lola Jake and found only one, but I couldn't tell if it is also a STP device or not.

I found a few on Like Real just now.  However, the cheapest was $425.   Yeah... I'm not going to spend that much.  maybe in a few years when I care about it being realistic.

For now, I don't care about it being realistic.  I've never had one before, and I'd like to try to start using one.  However, personally, I think circumcision is wrong, so I'd have to be pretty desperate to be willing to use a circumcised STP packer.

Quote from: JohnAlex on May 16, 2011, 10:29:43 PM

For now, I don't care about it being realistic.  I've never had one before, and I'd like to try to start using one.  However, personally, I think circumcision is wrong, so I'd have to be pretty desperate to be willing to use a circumcised STP packer.

Mine is what it is because I can't afford a fancy packer. Nobody sees my packer so it doesn't matter to me.

You're very welcome, thank you for your obvious sarcasm.

I'd like one as well, but only the expensive prosthetics have a foreskin option.  Lola jake, like real, and ftm prosthetics all have uncircumcised packers.  And only the LJ has a movable foreskin option (for an extra $500).  As far as I know, all the cheaper ones are circumcised.

Wish I could help you more.

It actually irks me a little bit, as a EUROPEAN, that almost all packers are only available in cut, and to get an uncut one you have to spend a lot of money.

Now, I know, conceptually, that this is because most are made in the US, but it still irks me.

The only circumcised penii in Iceland are a) circumcised due to real medical reasons, b) imported.
(And packers)

-.-

I thought I saw one on Like Real for about $125 or something...I could be mistaken as it was late that I was looking, but I could have swore to it.

Edit: Okay, my bad, just double-checked and I guess the lower-priced models aren't STP. I was also a little off with the $125 guess.

It's easier to produce a cut packer than an intact one is probably the main reason why packers are cut. I don't think cyberskin could produce a good/decent looking intact packer.

Quote from: Nygeel on May 17, 2011, 11:16:14 AM
It's easier to produce a cut packer than an intact one is probably the main reason why packers are cut. I don't think cyberskin could produce a good/decent looking intact packer.

I would have to say that this is probably a major factor, as well as, like someone else said, a lot of companies and products we're familiar with and that are popular are more American-based.

Also, came back to post about something I found in regard to Like Real's urination system option. Seems like it's not worth the extra money unless you want to try and figure out your own (in which case having the hole already would be wise).

Take a look (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGP8xJq_OzY#ws).

to my fellow europeans who think they'll stick out with a circumcised packy....i felt the same way but as it turns out, circumcised packers can actually work to our advantage, because if someone does catch a glimpse (as it has happened to me when peeing outside), they will blame the "odd look" that packers sorta do have on the fact that you're circumcised. i do not support circumcision and i hated that there were no uncut packers in the beginning. until i took a look at a dildo that had a foreskin and realized that it really didn't look any good. plus, unless it's retractable, it makes it weird to use the packer as a packnplay

Quote from: emil on May 17, 2011, 01:25:32 PM
to my fellow europeans who think they'll stick out with a circumcised packy....i felt the same way but as it turns out, circumcised packers can actually work to our advantage, because if someone does catch a glimpse (as it has happened to me when peeing outside), they will blame the "odd look" that packers sorta do have on the fact that you're circumcised. i do not support circumcision and i hated that there were no uncut packers in the beginning. until i took a look at a dildo that had a foreskin and realized that it really didn't look any good. plus, unless it's retractable, it makes it weird to use the packer as a packnplay

Since I live in America, it might work the opposite for me.  If I had an uncircumcised STP packer and someone saw it, they might blame the odd look on that.
It's interesting.

they most definitely would....i recall a conversation with a bunch of boys when i lived in the States and they were asking me whether i was circumcised  :D and they seemed to think uncircumcised penises look like elephant trunks (which admittedly they kind of do?), so i'd guess people in general aren't too educated on what penises look like on the other side of the world...

Quote from: emil on May 17, 2011, 03:50:53 PM
they most definitely would....i recall a conversation with a bunch of boys when i lived in the States and they were asking me whether i was circumcised  :D and they seemed to think uncircumcised penises look like elephant trunks (which admittedly they kind of do?), so i'd guess people in general aren't too educated on what penises look like on the other side of the world...

(https://www.susans.org/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg844.imageshack.us%2Fimg844%2F2404%2F0thumbnail.jpg&hash=b4d6a2307cd71d78eaa2577ca3a5e59c05da730f) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/844/0thumbnail.jpg/)

excuse the sillyness.... you may now revert to topic ;D

My (albeit meagre) google-fu led me to this site:
http://senslip.com/category.php?id_category=5 (http://senslip.com/category.php?id_category=5)
(technically NSFW for phalluses)

They make, well, penis-slips for men who want to appear uncircumcised. They're fairly inexpensive, come in several sizes, and look like they could easily be added to your run-of-the-mill packer. I'm not well-versed in the artificial foreskin market, but it might be an option for guys wanting the circumcised appearance?

<<men who want to appear circumcised.>>


Don't you mean UN?

Quote from: Andy on May 19, 2011, 09:51:52 PM
<<men who want to appear circumcised.>>


Don't you mean UN?

... yes. Derp  :P

Sorry, I went to bad at 4 last night. I'mma edit it now.
And I know the product isn't the most realistic-looking thing ever, but for covering a cheap packer or STP, I think it would work alright.

Quote from: Renard on May 19, 2011, 09:40:36 PM
My (albeit meagre) google-fu led me to this site:
http://senslip.com/category.php?id_category=5 (http://senslip.com/category.php?id_category=5)
(technically NSFW for phalluses)

They make, well, penis-slips for men who want to appear uncircumcised. They're fairly inexpensive, come in several sizes, and look like they could easily be added to your run-of-the-mill packer. I'm not well-versed in the artificial foreskin market, but it might be an option for guys wanting the circumcised appearance?

hey! thank you! :D that's genius. 
At this point, I don't care about it being realistic.  When i can afford a $400 packer, then I can afford to care about it being realistic looking :P

I've seen them one, but I've forgotten the site.
I honestly loathe the idea of circumcision, it seems so unnecessary plus they look cuter better uncut, so I don't get why more people don't make more.