Susan's Place Transgender Resources

News and Events => Opinions & Editorials => Topic started by: Natasha on July 11, 2011, 06:51:26 PM

Title: Trans Terminology: Of ->-bleeped-<-s and ->-bleeped-<-s
Post by: Natasha on July 11, 2011, 06:51:26 PM
Trans Terminology: Of ->-bleeped-<-s and ->-bleeped-<-s

http://blogs.montrealgazette.com/2011/07/10/trans-terminology-of-->-bleeped-<-s-and-->-bleeped-<-s/ (http://blogs.montrealgazette.com/2011/07/10/trans-terminology-of--%3E-bleeped-%3C-s-and--%3E-bleeped-%3C-s/)
7/10/11
By Jillian Page

Funny thing about trans terminology: what is acceptable to some is unacceptable to others. Take the word "->-bleeped-<-," for example. The Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation's media guide — used by many media outlets — says the word "->-bleeped-<-" is derogatory, and we in the media must not use it. In theory, if it is derogatory, nobody should be using it, right?

Wrong. Case in point: comedian Eddie Izzard, who will be performing in Montreal as part of the Comedy Festival this week, has referred to himself as a ->-bleeped-<- (though I am not sure if he still does). I first heard the term used in reference to Eddie on the wonderful BBC car-review show Top Gear, in which Eddie was a guest. The host referred to him as a ->-bleeped-<-